Cited by 24Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Ten Practical Recommendations for Improving Blinding Integrity and Reporting in Psychotherapy Trials

Mataix-Cols, David, Andersson, Erik·2021·JAMA Psychiatry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.1419

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mataix-Cols, D., & Andersson, E.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Venue
JAMA Psychiatry
Published
2021-09-01
Volume
78
Issue
9
Pages
943
ISSN
2168-622X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3176938380
Cited by
23
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6
FWCI
3.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
blinding, trial reporting, reporting quality
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Psychotherapy, Research Design, Single-Blind Method, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review