Cited by 237Psychedelics and Drug StudiesPain Management and Placebo EffectStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials

Great Expectations: recommendations for improving the methodological rigor of psychedelic clinical trials

Open access
Aday, Jacob S., Heifets, Boris D., Pratscher, Steven D., Bradley, Ellen, Rosen, Raymond, Woolley, Joshua D.·2022·Psychopharmacology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

RATIONALE: Psychedelic research continues to garner significant public and scientific interest with a growing number of clinical studies examining a wide range of conditions and disorders. However, expectancy effects and effective condition masking have been raised as critical limitations to the interpretability of the research. OBJECTIVE: In this article, we review the many methodological challenges of conducting psychedelic clinical trials and provide recommendations for improving the rigor of future research. RESULTS: Although some challenges are shared with psychotherapy and pharmacology trials more broadly, psychedelic clinical trials have to contend with several unique sources of potential bias. The subjective effects of a high-dose psychedelic are often so pronounced that it is difficult to mask participants to their treatment condition; the significant hype from positive media coverage on the clinical potential of psychedelics influences participants' expectations for treatment benefit; and participant unmasking and treatment expectations can interact in such a way that makes psychedelic therapy highly susceptible to large placebo and nocebo effects. Specific recommendations to increase the success of masking procedures and reduce the influence of participant expectancies are discussed in the context of study development, participant recruitment and selection, incomplete disclosure of the study design, choice of active placebo condition, as well as the measurement of participant expectations and masking efficacy. CONCLUSION: Incorporating the recommended design elements is intended to reduce the risk of bias in psychedelic clinical trials and thereby increases the ability to discern treatment-specific effects of psychedelic therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-022-06123-7

Cites

174 of 174 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Aday JS (2021) Delineating the association between psychedelic drug use and facets of gratitude, aesthetic experience, and relationships with nature. Dissertation, Central Michigan University
  2. Pahnke WN (1963) Drugs and mysticism: an analysis of the relationship between psychedelic drugs and the mystical consciousness: a thesis. Dissertation. Harvard University
  3. Puente I (2014) Holotropic breathwork can occasion mystical experiences in the context of a daylong workshop. J Transper Res 6: 40– 50

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aday, J. S., Heifets, B. D., Pratscher, S. D., Bradley, E., Rosen, R., & Woolley, J. D.
Affiliations
  • San Francisco VA Medical Center (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • University of Florida Health (US)
Corresponding author
  • Aday, Jacob S.
  • Heifets, Boris D.
  • Pratscher, Steven D.
  • Bradley, Ellen
  • Rosen, Raymond
  • Woolley, Joshua D.
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2022-04-01
Volume
239
Issue
6
Pages
1989-2010
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W4226207502
Cited by
237
References
174
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 18
FWCI
7.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (IK4 CX002090)
  • University of California, San Francisco
  • National Institute on Aging (T32AG049673)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Keywords
placebo effect, nocebo effect, expectancy effects, active placebo, treatment expectations, bias mitigation, research design, participant recruitment
MeSH terms
Hallucinogens, Humans, Motivation, Psychotherapy, Research Design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review