The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A severity index for epidemiological surveys of female urinary incontinence: Comparison with 48-hour pad-weighing tests
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Urinary incontinence was defined using the validated 2-item Incontinence Severity Index (included on the NHANES Kidney and Incontinence Questionnaire), which correlates well with incontinence volume based on pad weights and incontinence frequency obtained on bladder diaries.(8)”
From Urinary incontinence and disability in community-dwelling women: A cross-sectional study: Urinary Incontinence and Disability in Ambulatory Women (2015) · cites this paper as [8]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women
Nygaard, I. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.300.11.1311 · Cited by 1,869
“To define urinary incontinence, we used the validated 2-item incontinence severity index, which correlates well with incontinence volume based on pad weights and incontinence frequency obtained on bladder diaries.(2,3) The incontinence severity index is based on responses to frequency ( once per month, a few times a m…”
Urinary Incontinence in US Women: A Population-Based Study
Melville, J. L. (2005) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.165.5.537 · Cited by 482
Woodley, S. J., Lawrenson, P., Boyle, R., Cody, J. D., Mørkved, S., Kernohan, A., & Hay-Smith, E. J. C. (2020) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007471.pub4 · Cited by 347
Hawthorne, G. (2008) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-007-0279-8 · Cited by 279
Differences in prevalence of urinary incontinence by race/ethnicity.
Thom, D. H., van den Eeden, S. K., Ragins, A. I., Wassel-Fyr, C., Vittinghof, E., Subak, L. L., & Brown, J. S. (2006) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(05)00039-x · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Sandvik, H., Seim, A., Vanvik, A., & Hunskaar, S.
- Venue
- Neurourology and Urodynamics
- Published
- 2000
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
