Cited by 279Health disparities and outcomesAging, Health, and DisabilityCOVID-19 and Mental Health

Perceived social isolation in a community sample: its prevalence and correlates with aspects of peoples’ lives

Hawthorne, Graeme·2008·Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

Abstract

Although there are many studies reporting perceived social isolation or loneliness and their correlates in specific groups, there are few modern prevalence studies. This study reports on the prevalence of perceived social isolation in an Australian community sample. Randomly sampled Australian adults (n = 3,015) were interviewed using a standard questionnaire. In addition to perceived social isolation assessed by the Friendship Scale, data were collected on socio-demographic variables and chronic health conditions. The findings suggest that while most participants were socially connected, 9% reported some social isolation and 7% were isolated or very isolated. Perceived social isolation varied by gender and age group, region of birth, relationship, labourforce, and income status. A key finding was that younger adults had higher probabilities of being classified as being socially isolated than did older participants. Depression was very strongly associated with perceived social isolation. Other health conditions or life experiences associated with it were hearing, incontinence and lifetime trauma exposure. The demographic characteristics and chronic health conditions associated with perceived social isolation are structural circumstances of peoples' lives. Given there are poor long-term health outcomes, including early death and suicide, there are clear public health implications for those trapped by these life circumstances.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00127-007-0279-8

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hawthorne, G.
Affiliations
The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Hawthorne, Graeme
Venue
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Published
2007-11-09
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
140-150
ISSN
  • 0933-7954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-9285
OpenAlex
W1963503695
Cited by
279
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 18
FWCI
7.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
perceived social isolation, loneliness, prevalence, depression, chronic disease, hearing loss, incontinence, lifetime trauma exposure, gender differences, age differences, socioeconomic status, community-dwelling adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Australia, Female, Health Status, Humans, Loneliness, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Social Isolation, Socioeconomic Factors, Prevalence, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review