CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 28Intellectual Property and PatentsIntellectual Property LawGenetically Modified Organisms Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intellectual Property Rights for Plant Biotechnology: International Aspects

Boettiger, Sara, Graff, Gregory D., Pardey, Philip G., Van Dusen, Eric, Wright, Brian D.·2004·Handbook of Plant Biotechnology
DOI 10.1002/0470869143.kc057
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Intellectual property rights (IPR) are important internationally, in public, non‐profit and private institutions, both as incentives for innovation and as constraints on freedom to operate in agricultural research and development. Early 20th century progress in plant breeding and genetics led to the development of hybridisation, which increased yields while providing an important physical means of restricting the reproduction of plant genetic resources. Subsequently, in countries around the world the expansion of ‘intellectual property rights’ (IPR) has created several other means of restricting the reproduction and trading of plant genetic resources.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/0470869143.kc057

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. BartonJ(2003).Non‐obviousness. IDEA: J Law & Technol 43(3) in press.
  2. Boisvert V, 2000, Constituting the Commons: Crafting Sustainable Commons in the New Millenium, the Eighth Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, May 31
  3. Brush SB, 1996, Valuing Local Knowledge: Indigenous People and Intellectual Property Rights
  4. Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, Working Group on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, 2001, Potential Impacts of Genetic Use Restriction Technologies (GURTS) on Agricultural Biodiversity and Agricultural Production Systems
  5. DiazCL(2000).Regional approaches to implementing the convention on biological diversity: the case of access to genetic resources.Proceedings of Concerted Action Programme on the Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements and EU Legislation Barcelona.
  6. Dutfield G, 2002, Trade, Intellectual Property and Biogenetic Resources: A Guide to the International Regulatory Framework
  7. Evenson DD, 2000, Agricultural and Intellectual Property Rights: Economic, Institutional and Implementation Issues in Biotechnology
  8. Evenson RE, 2000, Agricultural and Intellectual Property Rights: Economic, Institutional and Implementation Issues in Biotechnology
  9. Feinsilver JM, 1996, Will biodiversity prospecting for pharmaceuticals strike ‘green gold’, Diversity, 12, 20
  10. Janis MD, 2003, US plant variety protection: sound and fury, Houst Law Rev, 39, 727
  11. JordensR(2002).UPOV's perspective WIPO‐UPOV Symposium on the Co‐Existence of Patents and Plant Breeders' Rights in the Promotion of Biotechnological Developments. Geneva October 25.
  12. Koo B, 2002, Endowing Future Harvests: The Long‐Term Costs of Conserving Genetic Resources at the CGIAR Centres
  13. Lanjouw JO, 2002, A patent policy for global diseases: US and international legal issues, Harvard J Law Technol, 16, 1
  14. Lanjouw JO, 2002, Policy Brief, 3
  15. Lerner J, 2002, NBER Working Paper
  16. National Research Council (NRC), 1993, (US) Committee on Managing Global Genetic Resources: Agricultural Imperatives
  17. Pardey PG, 2001, IFPRI Food Policy Report
  18. Pardey PG, 2003, Biotechnology and Genetic Resources Policies, Briefs 1–6
  19. Shoemaker R, 2001, USDA, ERS Agricultural Information Bulletin No. 762. Economic Research Service Washington, DC
  20. Taylor MR, 2002, RFF Discussion Paper
  21. Wendt J, 2000, La Practica del Acceso a los Recursos Geneticos y de los Derecheos de Obtenciones Vegetales en America Latina

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 28

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Boettiger, S., Graff, G. D., Pardey, P. G., Van Dusen, E., & Wright, B. D.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
ORCID
Venue
Handbook of Plant Biotechnology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-03-30
DOI
10.1002/0470869143.kc057
OpenAlex
W1595090502
Cited by
28
References
57
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Intellectual Property and Patents
  • Social Sciences › Law › Intellectual Property Law
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Keywords
intellectual property, plant biotechnology, plant genetic resources, hybridization, plant breeding, agricultural research and development, freedom to operate, innovation incentives, trade barriers, plant genetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review