The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intellectual Property Rights for Plant Biotechnology: International Aspects
Abstract
Intellectual property rights (IPR) are important internationally, in public, non‐profit and private institutions, both as incentives for innovation and as constraints on freedom to operate in agricultural research and development. Early 20th century progress in plant breeding and genetics led to the development of hybridisation, which increased yields while providing an important physical means of restricting the reproduction of plant genetic resources. Subsequently, in countries around the world the expansion of ‘intellectual property rights’ (IPR) has created several other means of restricting the reproduction and trading of plant genetic resources.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“in many low- and middle-income countries, GM crops are not patented, or patent protection is not strictly enforced when it exists.”
From Environmental impacts of genetically modified crops (2024) · cites this paper as [39]
In the citing paper
“Once GMcrop technology receives approval in these countries, seed production and distribution face fewer legal barriers ( 39 ).”
From Environmental impacts of genetically modified crops (2024) · cites this paper as [39]
Citations
Cites
Church, J. A. (2001) · Journal of Government Information · doi:10.1016/s1352-0237(01)00307-0 · Cited by 9,208
Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development
Levin, R. C., Klevorick, A. K., Nelson, R. R., Winter, S. G., Gilbert, R., & Griliches, Z. (1987) · Brookings Papers on Economic Activity · doi:10.2307/2534454 · Cited by 3,772
Braithwaite, J. B., & Drahos, P. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9780521780339 · Cited by 1,757
Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2001) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00100-6 · Cited by 1,425
Woolcock, M., Braithwaite, J. B., & Drahos, P. (2001) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/3089030 · Cited by 1,351
Biopiracy: the plunder of nature and knowledge
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-0892 · Cited by 989
Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Economy
Maskus, K. E. (2000) · Cited by 659
Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Economy
Lowry, S. C. (2001) · eYLS (Yale Law School) · Cited by 590
United Nations Development Programme (1999) · Human development report · doi:10.18356/b0af4460-en · Cited by 545
First the seed: The political economy of plant biotechnology, 1492–2000
(1991) · World Development · doi:10.1016/0305-750x(91)90222-4 · Cited by 506
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- BartonJ(2003).Non‐obviousness. IDEA: J Law & Technol 43(3) in press.
- Boisvert V, 2000, Constituting the Commons: Crafting Sustainable Commons in the New Millenium, the Eighth Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, May 31
- Brush SB, 1996, Valuing Local Knowledge: Indigenous People and Intellectual Property Rights
- Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, Working Group on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, 2001, Potential Impacts of Genetic Use Restriction Technologies (GURTS) on Agricultural Biodiversity and Agricultural Production Systems
- DiazCL(2000).Regional approaches to implementing the convention on biological diversity: the case of access to genetic resources.Proceedings of Concerted Action Programme on the Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements and EU Legislation Barcelona.
- Dutfield G, 2002, Trade, Intellectual Property and Biogenetic Resources: A Guide to the International Regulatory Framework
- Evenson DD, 2000, Agricultural and Intellectual Property Rights: Economic, Institutional and Implementation Issues in Biotechnology
- Evenson RE, 2000, Agricultural and Intellectual Property Rights: Economic, Institutional and Implementation Issues in Biotechnology
- Feinsilver JM, 1996, Will biodiversity prospecting for pharmaceuticals strike ‘green gold’, Diversity, 12, 20
- Janis MD, 2003, US plant variety protection: sound and fury, Houst Law Rev, 39, 727
- JordensR(2002).UPOV's perspective WIPO‐UPOV Symposium on the Co‐Existence of Patents and Plant Breeders' Rights in the Promotion of Biotechnological Developments. Geneva October 25.
- Koo B, 2002, Endowing Future Harvests: The Long‐Term Costs of Conserving Genetic Resources at the CGIAR Centres
- Lanjouw JO, 2002, A patent policy for global diseases: US and international legal issues, Harvard J Law Technol, 16, 1
- Lanjouw JO, 2002, Policy Brief, 3
- Lerner J, 2002, NBER Working Paper
- National Research Council (NRC), 1993, (US) Committee on Managing Global Genetic Resources: Agricultural Imperatives
- Pardey PG, 2001, IFPRI Food Policy Report
- Pardey PG, 2003, Biotechnology and Genetic Resources Policies, Briefs 1–6
- Shoemaker R, 2001, USDA, ERS Agricultural Information Bulletin No. 762. Economic Research Service Washington, DC
- Taylor MR, 2002, RFF Discussion Paper
- Wendt J, 2000, La Practica del Acceso a los Recursos Geneticos y de los Derecheos de Obtenciones Vegetales en America Latina
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Environmental impacts of genetically modified crops
Noack, F., Engist, D., Gantois, J., Gaur, V., Hyjazie, B. F., Larsen, A., M’Gonigle, L. K., Missirian, A., Qaim, M., Sargent, R. D., et al. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.ado9340 · Cited by 70
The evolving rights to intellectual property protection in the agricultural biosciences
Wright, B. D., & Pardey, P. G. (2006) · International Journal of Technology and Globalisation · doi:10.1504/ijtg.2006.009124 · Cited by 68
Self-citationGenetic use restriction technologies: a review
Lombardo, L. (2014) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12242 · Cited by 42
Inventions and patenting in Africa: Empirical trends from 1970 to 2010
Graff, G. D., & Pardey, P. G. (2019) · The Journal of World Intellectual Property · doi:10.1111/jwip.12139 · Cited by 33
Self-citationThe economics of agricultural innovation
Alston, J. M., & Pardey, P. G. (2021) · Handbook of agricultural economics · doi:10.1016/bs.hesagr.2021.10.001 · Cited by 32
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Boettiger, S., Graff, G. D., Pardey, P. G., Van Dusen, E., & Wright, B. D.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Venue
- Handbook of Plant Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-03-30
- OpenAlex
- W1595090502
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Intellectual Property and Patents
- Social Sciences › Law › Intellectual Property Law
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
- Keywords
- intellectual property, plant biotechnology, plant genetic resources, hybridization, plant breeding, agricultural research and development, freedom to operate, innovation incentives, trade barriers, plant genetics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
