The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Isolation of Mouse Neutrophils
Open accessAbstract
Neutrophils represent the first line of defense against bacterial and fungal pathogens. Indeed, patients with inherited and acquired qualitative and quantitative neutrophil defects are at high risk for developing bacterial and fungal infections and suffering adverse outcomes from these infections. Therefore, research aiming at defining the molecular factors that modulate neutrophil effector function under homeostatic conditions and during infection is essential for devising strategies to augment neutrophil function and improve the outcome of infected individuals. This unit describes a reproducible density gradient centrifugation‐based protocol that can be applied in any laboratory to harvest large numbers of highly enriched and highly viable neutrophils from the bone marrow of mice both at the steady state and following infection with Candida albicans as described in UNIT . In another protocol, we also present a method that combines gentle enzymatic tissue digestion with a positive immunomagnetic selection technique or Fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (FACS) to harvest highly pure and highly viable preparations of neutrophils directly from mouse tissues such as the kidney, the liver or the spleen. Finally, methods for isolating neutrophils from mouse peritoneal fluid and peripheral blood are included. Mouse neutrophils isolated by these protocols can be used for examining several aspects of cellular function ex vivo including pathogen binding, phagocytosis and killing, neutrophil chemotaxis, oxidative burst, degranulation and cytokine production, and for performing neutrophil adoptive transfer experiments. © 2015 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lionakis, M. S., Fischer, B. G., Lim, J. K., Swamydas, M., Wan, W., Richard Lee, C.-C., Cohen, J. I., Scheinberg, P., Gao, J.-L., & Murphy, P. M. (2012) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002865 · Cited by 118
Self-citation
Cited by
Gasdermin D plays a vital role in the generation of neutrophil extracellular traps
Sollberger, G., Choidas, A., Burn, G. L., Habenberger, P., Di Lucrezia, R., Kordes, S., Menninger, S., Eickhoff, J., Nussbaumer, P., Klebl, B., et al. (2018) · Science Immunology · doi:10.1126/sciimmunol.aar6689 · Cited by 758
Kehl-Fie, T. E., Chitayat, S., Hood, M. I., Damo, S., Restrepo, N., Garcia, C., Munro, K. A., Chazin, W. J., & Skaar, E. P. (2011) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2011.07.004 · Cited by 419
Neutrophil-induced ferroptosis promotes tumor necrosis in glioblastoma progression
Yee, P. P., Wei, Y., Kim, S.-Y., Lu, T., Chih, S. Y., Lawson, C., Tang, M., Liu, Z., Anderson, B., Thamburaj, K., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19193-y · Cited by 412
Zhang, H., Liu, J., Zhou, Y., Qu, M., Wang, Y., Guo, K., Shen, R., Sun, Z., Cata, J. P., Yang, S., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Biological Sciences · doi:10.7150/ijbs.69141 · Cited by 336
Hemmers, S., Teijaro, J. R., Arandjelovic, S., & Mowen, K. A. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022043 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Swamydas, M., Luo, Y., Dorf, M. E., & Lionakis, M. S.
- Venue
- Current Protocols in Immunology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-08
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3.20.1-3.20.15
- ISSN
- 1934-3671 (ISSN-L)
- 1934-368X
- OpenAlex
- W1821971821
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Isolation of Mouse Neutrophils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/0471142735.im0320s110
- The paper
- Swamydas, M., Luo, Y., Dorf, M. E., & Lionakis, M. S. (2015). Isolation of Mouse Neutrophils. Current Protocols in Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142735.im0320s110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.