Cited by 238Trauma and Emergency Care StudiesSpinal Cord Injury ResearchSpinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques

Spinal immobilisation for trauma patients

Open access
Kwan, Irene, Bunn, Frances, Roberts, Ian G·2001·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spinal immobilisation involves the use of a number of devices and strategies to stabilise the spinal column after injury and thus prevent spinal cord damage. The practice is widely recommended and widely used in trauma patients with suspected spinal cord injury in the pre-hospital setting. OBJECTIVES: To quantify the effect of different methods of spinal immobilisation (including immobilisation versus no immobilisation) on mortality, neurological disability, spinal stability and adverse effects in trauma patients. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register (CCTR), the specialised register of the Cochrane Injuries Group, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PubMed and the National Research Register. We checked reference lists of all articles and contacted experts in the field to identify eligible trials. Manufacturers of spinal immobilisation devices were also contacted for information. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing spinal immobilisation strategies in trauma patients with suspected spinal cord injury. Trials in healthy volunteers were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently applied eligibility criteria to trial reports and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: We found no randomised controlled trials of spinal immobilisation strategies in trauma patients. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: We did not find any randomised controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria. The effect of spinal immobilisation on mortality, neurological injury, spinal stability and adverse effects in trauma patients remains uncertain. Because airway obstruction is a major cause of preventable death in trauma patients, and spinal immobilisation, particularly of the cervical spine, can contribute to airway compromise, the possibility that immobilisation may increase mortality and morbidity cannot be excluded. Large prospective studies are needed to validate the decision criteria for spinal immobilisation in trauma patients with high risk of spinal injury. Randomised controlled trials in trauma patients are required to establish the relative effectiveness of alternative strategies for spinal immobilisation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd002803

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is very limited published evidence to support the notion that cervical spine collars and immobilization prevent secondary spinal cord injury.

    “there is very limited published evidence to support the notion that cervical spine collars and immobilization prevent secondary spinal cord injury.28,29”

    From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [28]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Butman A, Schelble DT, Vomacka RW. The relevance of the occult cervical spine controversy and mechanism of injury to prehospital protocols: a review of the issues and literature. Prehospital Disaster Medicine 1996;11:228-33.
  2. Davies G, Deakin A, Wilson A. The effect of a rigid collar on intracranial pressure. Injury 1996;27(9):647-9.
  3. Davis JW, Phreaner DL, Hoyt DB, Mackersie RC. The etiology of missed spine injuries. Journal of Trauma 1993;34(3):342-6.
  4. Domeier RM. NAEMSP Position Paper: Indications for prehospital spinal immobilisation. Prehospital Emergency Care 1999;3:251-3.
  5. Hauswald M, Ong G, Tandberg D, Omar Z. Out-of-hospital spinal immobilisation: its effect on neurologic injury. Academic Emergency Medicine 1998;5(3):214-9.
  6. Hewitt S. Skin necrosis caused by a semi-rigid cervical collar in a ventilated patient with multiple injuries. Injury 1994;25:323-4.
  7. Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Wolfson AB, Todd KH, Zucker M. Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. New England Journal of Medicine 2000;343:94-9.
  8. Houghton DJ, Curley JW. Dysphagia caused by a hard cervical collar. British Journal of Neurosurgery 1996;10:501-2.
  9. McHugh TP, Taylor JP. Unnecessary out-of-hospital use of full spinal immobilsation. Academic Emergency Medicine 1998;5:278-80.
  10. Orledge JD, Pepe PE. Out-of-hospital Spinal Immobilization: Is It Really Necessary?. Academic Emergency Medicine 1998;5(3):203-4.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kwan, I., Bunn, F., & Roberts, I. G.
Affiliations
  • Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (GB)
  • University of Hertfordshire (GB)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-04-23
Issue
2
Pages
CD002803-CD002803
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W1498642109
Cited by
238
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Keywords
spinal immobilization, spinal cord injury, trauma patients, prehospital care, cervical spine, airway obstruction, neurological deficit, mortality, spinal stability
MeSH terms
Humans, Immobilization, Spinal Cord Injuries, Spinal Injuries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review