Cited by 86Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurological Disorders and TreatmentsAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Acetyl-l-carnitine for dementia

Open access
Hudson, Sheila A, Tabet, Naji·2003·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dementia is a common mental health problem affecting 5% of those over 65. Various pathological processes are linked to memory impairment in dementia, particularly those affecting the cholinergic neurotransmitter system. Acetyl-l-carnitine (ALC) is derived from carnitine and is described as having several properties which may be beneficial in dementia. This includes activity at cholinergic neurons, membrane stabilization and enhancing mitochondrial function. Work on the effects of ALC has been ongoing since the 1980s yet the efficacy of ALC in cognitive decline remains unclear. Early studies suggested a beneficial effect of ALC on cognition and behaviour in aging subjects. However, later, larger studies have not supported these findings. Some of the difficulties lie in the early and later studies differing widely in methodology and assessment tools used, and are therefore difficult to compare. ALC is not currently in routine clinical use. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review is to establish whether Acetyl-l-carnitine is clinically effective in the treatment of people with dementia. SEARCH STRATEGY: The trials were identified from a search of the Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group on 8 January 2003 using the terms acetyl-l-carnitine, l-carnitine acetyl ester, acetylcarnitine. SELECTION CRITERIA: All double-blind, randomized, trials involving people with dementia in which treatment with ALC was compared with a placebo group DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted by a reviewer (SH) and entered into Revman 4.1 software. Where possible intention-to-treat data were used, but most of the analyses were of completers (people who completed the study). MAIN RESULTS: There are 11 included trials, all of which had restricted the participants to people with Alzheimer's disease. All trials assessed the cognitive effects of ALC and in addition six considered severity of dementia, six considered functional ability and six considered clinical global impression. There were statistically significant treatment effects in favour of ALC at 12 and 24 weeks for the numbers showing improvement as determined by Clinical Global Impression, [OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.25 to 4.35, P<0.01] and [OR 3.91, 95% CI 1.32 to 11.54, P=0.01] but not as determined by the CIGIC at 52 weeks. There was no evidence of benefit for ALC in the areas of cognition, severity of dementia, functional ability or Clinical Global Impression as a continuous measure. Various adverse events were reported, but from the meta-analyses there were no statistically significant differences between treated and placebo groups. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence for benefit of ALC on clinical global impression, but there was no evidence using objective assessments in any other area of outcome. Given the large number of comparisons made, the statistically significant result may be due to chance. At present there is no evidence to recommend its routine use in clinical practice. Although the intention of the review was to access ALC for the treatment of all dementias, the included trials had confined themselves to participants with Alzheimer's disease. Individual patient data may add to the findings, as would trials including other types of dementia and other outcomes (e.g. mood and caregiver quality of life). However, the evidence does not suggest that ALC is likely to prove an important therapeutic agent. More work on the pharmacokinetics of ALC in humans is also required.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd003158

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research findings are mixed regarding A-GPC's potential to impact cognition.

    “Currently, research findings are mixed regarding A-GPC’s potential to impact cognition [7,8].”

    From Acute Alpha-Glycerylphosphorylcholine Supplementation Enhances Cognitive Performance in Healthy Men (2024) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Discussion reports mixed cognitive findings for acetyl-l-carnitine (ALC), not A-GPC. The Genazzani 1990 section mentions a study comparing ALC with l-alpha-glyceryl-phosphorylcholine, but gives no cognitive findings for the latter. Searches for A-GPC and l-alpha-glyceryl-phosphorylcholine found no passage assessing whether its effects on cognition are mixed. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Battistin L, Pizzolato G, Dam M, Ponza I, Perlotto N, Bergamo LC, Furlanut M De, Ziliotto R, Bardin G, Chinaglia L, Ferro Milione F, Lorizio A, Luria E, Ravenna C, Toso V, Zanetti R, Bendetti N, Calvani M. Effects of acetyl-L-carnitine (ALC) treatment in dementia: A multicentric, randomized, double-blind study. New Trends in Clinical Neuropharmacology 1989;3(2):131-2.
  2. Bowman 1992 {published data only} Bowman BAB. Acetyl-carnitine and Alzheimer's disease. Nutrition Reviews 1992;50(5):142-4.
  3. Bravi 1994 {unpublished data only} Bravi D, Koch G, Calvani M, Bacchieri A, Pola P, NiBhuachalla S, Carta A. A meta-analysis evaluation of clinical trials in Alzheimer's Patients treated with Acetyl-l-carnitine. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts. 1991; Vol. 20:1778.
  4. Aureli T, Capuani G, Micchelli O, Ghirardi O, Ramacci MT, Conti E. Changes in brain memebrane phospholipid composition during aging: Effect of Acetyl-l-carnitine. Journal of Neurochemistry 1991;57(Suppl):S115.
  5. Bella R, Bondi R, Raffaelle R, Pennisi G. Effect of acetylcarnitine on geriatric patients suffering from dysthymic disorders. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacological Research 1990.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hudson, S. A., & Tabet, N.
Affiliations
  • Stoke Mandeville Hospital (GB)
  • University of Brighton (GB)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-04-22
Volume
2010
Issue
1
Pages
CD003158-CD003158
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W1589659473
Cited by
86
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
acetyl-L-carnitine, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, cognitive decline, cholinergic system, clinical global impression, functional capacity, treatment efficacy, placebo comparison, memory impairment, mitochondrial function
MeSH terms
Acetylcarnitine, Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Dementia, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Nootropic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review