Cited by 209Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeurological Disorders and Treatments

Meta-analysis of double blind randomized controlled clinical trials of acetyl-L-carnitine versus placebo in the treatment of mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer??s disease

Montgomery, Stuart A., Thal, L.J., Amrein, R.·2003·International Clinical Psychopharmacology

Abstract

The efficacy of acetyl-L-carnitine (gamma-trimethyl- beta-acetylbutyrobetaine (Alcar) in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild (early) Alzheimer's disease (AD) was investigated with a meta-analysis of double-blind, placebo-controlled prospective, parallel group comparison studies of at least 3 months duration. The duration of the studies was 3, 6 or 12 months and the daily dose varied between studies from 1.5-3.0 g/day. An effect size was calculated to reflect the results of the variety of measures used in the studies grouped into the categories of clinical tests and psychometric tests. The effect sizes from the categories were integrated into an overall summary effect size. The effect size for the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-CH) was calculated separately. Meta-analysis showed a significant advantage for Alcar compared to placebo for the integrated summary effect [ES =0.201, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.107-0.295] and CGI-CH (ES =0.32, 95% CI=0.18-0.47). The beneficial effects were seen on both the clinical scales and the psychometric tests. The advantage for Alcar was seen by the time of the first assessment at 3 months and increased over time. Alcar was well tolerated in all studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004850-200303000-00001

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Acetyl-L-carnitine's beneficial effects on cognition have been documented in the treatment of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease, as well as of hepatic encephalopathy.

    “ALC’s beneficial effects on cognition have been documented in the treatment of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease, as well as of hepatic encephalopathy [129, 130].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Montgomery, S. A., Thal, L. J., & Amrein, R.
Affiliations
  • University of London (GB)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Montgomery, Stuart A.
Venue
International Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
2003-03
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
61-71
ISSN
0268-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W12598816
Cited by
209
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Tạp chí Thông tin và Tư liệu
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
acetyl-L-carnitine, mild cognitive impairment, mild Alzheimer's disease, early Alzheimer's disease, cognitive function, Clinical Global Impression of Change, psychometric tests, drug efficacy, tolerability
MeSH terms
Acetylcarnitine, Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Cognition, Humans, Prospective Studies, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Nootropic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review