The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interventions for alopecia areata
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Alopecia areata is a disorder in which there is loss of hair causing patches of baldness but with no scarring of the affected area. It can affect the entire scalp (alopecia totalis) or cause loss of all body hair (alopecia universalis). It is a relatively common condition affecting 0.15% of the population. Although in many cases it can be a self-limiting condition, nevertheless hair loss can often have a severe social and emotional impact. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of interventions used in the management of alopecia areata, alopecia totalis and alopecia universalis. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register in February 2006, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2006), MEDLINE (from 2003 to February 2006), EMBASE (from 2005 to February 2006), PsycINFO (from 1806 to February 2006), AMED (Allied and Complementary Medicine, from 1985 to February 2006), LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information database, from 1982 to February 2006), and reference lists of articles. We also searched online trials registries for ongoing trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials that evaluated the effectiveness of both topical and systemic interventions for alopecia areata, alopecia totalis, and alopecia universalis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors assessed trial quality and extracted the data. We contacted trial authors for more information. We collected adverse effects information from the included trials. MAIN RESULTS: Seventeen trials were included with a total of 540 participants. Each trial included from 6 to 85 participants and they assessed a range of interventions that included topical and oral corticosteroids, topical ciclosporin, photodynamic therapy and topical minoxidil. Overall, none of the interventions showed significant treatment benefit in terms of hair growth when compared with placebo. We did not find any studies where the participants self-assessed their hair growth or quality of life. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Few treatments for alopecia areata have been well evaluated in randomised trials. We found no RCTs on the use of diphencyprone, dinitrochlorobenzene, intralesional corticosteroids or dithranol although they are commonly used for the treatment of alopecia areata. Similarly although topical steroids and minoxidil are widely prescribed and appear to be safe, there is no convincing evidence that they are beneficial in the long-term. Most trials have been reported poorly and are so small that any important clinical benefits are inconclusive. There is a desperate need for large well conducted studies that evaluate long-term effects of therapies on quality of life. Considering the possibility of spontaneous remission especially for those in the early stages of the disease, the options of not being treated therapeutically or, depending on individual preference wearing a wig may be alternative ways of dealing with this condition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials
Jüni, P., Altman, D. G., & Egger, M. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7303.42 · Cited by 3,309
Egger, M., Jüni, P., Bartlett, C., Holenstein, F., & Sterne, J. (2003) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta7010 · Cited by 1,181
Cited by
Pratt, C. H., King, L. E., Messenger, A. G., Christiano, A. M., & Sundberg, J. P. (2017) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2017.11 · Cited by 787
The psychological impact of alopecia
Hunt, N., & McHale, S. (2005) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7522.951 · Cited by 450
Safety and efficacy of the JAK inhibitor tofacitinib citrate in patients with alopecia areata
Kennedy Crispin, M., Ko, J. M., Craiglow, B. G., Li, S., Shankar, G., Urban, J. R., Chen, J. C., Cerise, J. E., Jabbari, A., Winge, M. C. G., et al. (2016) · JCI Insight · doi:10.1172/jci.insight.89776 · Cited by 355
British Association of Dermatologists’ guidelines for the management of alopecia areata 2012
Messenger, A. G., McKillop, J., Farrant, P., McDonagh, A. J., Sladden, M., Hughes, J., McLelland, J., Punjabi, S., Buckley, D. A., Nasr, I., et al. (2012) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10955.x · Cited by 347
Self-citationTransient Efficacy of Tofacitinib in Alopecia Areata Universalis
Anzengruber, F., Maul, J.-T., Kamarachev, J., Trüeb, R. M., French, L. E., & Navarini, A. A. (2016) · Case Reports in Dermatology · doi:10.1159/000445182 · Cited by 304
Metadata
- Authors
- Delamere, F. M., Sladden, M. J., Dobbins, H. M., & Leonardi-Bee, J.
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-04-16
- Volume
- 2021
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- CD004413-CD004413
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-1858
- OpenAlex
- W2091907707
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interventions for alopecia areata. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/14651858.cd004413.pub2
- The paper
- Delamere, F. M., Sladden, M. J., Dobbins, H. M., & Leonardi-Bee, J. (2008). Interventions for alopecia areata. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd004413.pub2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.