Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 347

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

British Association of Dermatologists’ guidelines for the management of alopecia areata 2012

Open access
Messenger, A.G., McKillop, J., Farrant, P., McDonagh, A.J., Sladden, M., Hughes, J., McLelland, J., Punjabi, S., Buckley, D.A., Nasr, I., Swale, V.J., Duarte Williamson, C.E., McHenry, P.M., Wagle, S., Amin, S., Davis, R., Haveron, S.E., Mohd Mustapa, M.F.·2012·British Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

The guidelines have been revised and updated in accordance with a predetermined scope, based on that used in the 2003 guidelines. Recommendations in these guidelines supersede those in the 2003 guidelines. The objectives of the guidelines are to provide up‐to‐date recommendations for the management of alopecia areata in adults and children and a summary of the evidence base. This guidance has been written by dermatologists and a patient representative. The draft guideline was made available for consultation and review by the British Association of Dermatologists’ (BAD) membership, the Primary Care Dermatological Society (PCDS), the British Dermatological Nursing Group (BDNG) and the board of Alopecia UK, a patient support organization. The final document was peer‐reviewed by the Clinical Standards Unit of the BAD (made up of the Therapy and Guidelines subcommittee) prior to publication. These guidelines have been developed using the BAD’s recommendations1 and also with reference to the AGREE (Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation) instrument.2 PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched from January 2002 to January 2012 and full relevant papers in the English language obtained. Additional, targeted searches were also carried out across these three databases, as well as a search on the Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED); details of the search strategy are available as an Appendix online (see Supporting Information). The recommendations made are those that are currently considered best practice. Where possible they are based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, in view of the limited evidence from RCTs, guidance is also based on less rigorously controlled studies, uncontrolled studies, on clinical experience, and on patient experience. These recommendations will be modified at intervals in light of new evidence. This document has been prepared on behalf of the BAD and is based on the best data available when the document was prepared. It is recognized that under certain conditions it may be necessary to deviate from the guidelines, and that the results of future studies may require some of the recommendations herein to be changed. Failure to adhere to these guidelines should not necessarily be considered negligent, nor should adherence to these recommendations constitute a defence against a claim of negligence. The proposed revision date for this set of recommendations is scheduled for 2017; where necessary, important interim changes will be updated on the BAD website. Alopecia areata is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects the hair follicle and sometimes the nail. The onset may be at any age and there is no known race or sex preponderance. Alopecia areata usually presents as patches of hair loss on the scalp but any hair‐bearing skin can be involved. The affected skin may be slightly reddened but otherwise appears normal. Short broken hairs (exclamation mark hairs) are frequently seen around the margins of expanding patches of alopecia areata. The nails are involved in about 10% of patients referred for specialist advice. Hair follicles are preserved in alopecia areata and the potential for recovery of hair growth is maintained, even in longstanding disease. One study from Japan reported that spontaneous remission within 1 year occurred in 80% of patients with a small number of circumscribed patches of hair loss.3 Data from secondary and tertiary referral centres are less favourable indicating that 34–50% of patients will recover within 1 year. Almost all will experience more than one episode of the disease, and 14–25% progress to total loss of scalp hair (alopecia totalis, AT) or loss of the entire scalp and body hair (alopecia universalis, AU), from which full recovery is unusual (< 10%).4, 5 Disease severity at presentation is the strongest predictor of long‐term outcome. In an Italian study, 191 patients with alopecia areata who presented to a university dermatology clinic between 1983 and 1990 were contacted by telephone in 2005 to give self‐reports of their clinical status.6 Patients with less severe disease at presentation were more likely to report being free of disease at follow‐up (68% with less than 25% hair loss initially; 32% with 25–50% hair loss initially; 8% with more than 50% hair loss initially). Patients with more severe disease initially were also more likely to report worsening patterns of alopecia such as AT and AU. The prognosis is also less favourable when onset occurs during childhood4, 7–9 and in ophiasis.9 The concurrence of atopic disease has been reported to be associated with a poor prognosis3, 9 but this has been disputed.10 About 20% of people with alopecia areata have a family history of the disease indicating a genetic predisposition.11 Associations have been reported with a variety of genes, including major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and cytokine genes, suggesting that the genetic predisposition is multifactorial in n

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10955.x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

See all 347

Metadata

Authors
Messenger, A. G., McKillop, J., Farrant, P., McDonagh, A. J., Sladden, M., Hughes, J., McLelland, J., Punjabi, S., Buckley, D. A., Nasr, I., Swale, V. J., Duarte Williamson, C. E., McHenry, P. M., Wagle, S., Amin, S., Davis, R., Haveron, S. E., & Mohd Mustapa, M. F.
Venue
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2012-04-23
Volume
166
Issue
5
Pages
916-926
ISSN
  • 0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2133
OpenAlex
W2096510364
Cited by
347
References
28
FWCI
18.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: British Association of Dermatologists’ guidelines for the management of alopecia areata 2012. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10955.x
The paper
Messenger, A. G., McKillop, J., Farrant, P., McDonagh, A. J., Sladden, M., Hughes, J., McLelland, J., Punjabi, S., Buckley, D. A., Nasr, I., Swale, V. J., Duarte Williamson, C. E., McHenry, P. M., Wagle, S., Amin, S., Davis, R., Haveron, S. E., & Mohd Mustapa, M. F. (2012). British Association of Dermatologists’ guidelines for the management of alopecia areata 2012. British Journal of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10955.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.