Cited by 15Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareNursing education and management

Clinical outcomes for women who had continuity of care experiences with midwifery students

Open access
Tickle, Nikki, Gamble, Jenny, Creedy, Debra K.·2022·Women and Birth

Abstract

Background Pre-registration midwifery students in Australia are required to engage in a minimum of ten continuity of care experiences (CoCE). Students recruit and gain consent of each woman to provide CoCE under direct supervision of a registered health professional, usually a midwife. Clinical outcomes for women who had CoCE with a midwifery student placed in a continuity of midwifery care (CMC) or fragmented models are rarely reported.Aims 1. analyse clinical outcomes for women experiencing CMC with CoCE by students; 2. analyse clinical outcomes for women in a fragmented care model with CoCE by students; and 3. compare clinical outcomes according to women's primary model of care.Methods Students undertaking a Bachelor of Midwifery program at one Australian university recorded clinical outcomes for women experiencing CoCE during pregnancy [n=5972] and labour and birth [n=3933] in an e-portfolio. A retrospective, cohort design compared student recorded maternal data with National Core Maternity Indicators and Queensland Perinatal Data.Results Midwifery students providing CoCE reported better or equal clinical outcomes for women compared to population data. Women receiving CoCE had reduced likelihood of tobacco smoking after 20 weeks of pregnancy, episiotomy, and third and fourth degree tears.Conclusions Clinical outcomes for women in fragmented models of care and receiving CoCE by undergraduate, pre-registration midwifery students are equal to or better than State data across 12 variables. CoCE should be offered to all women early in their pregnancy to ensure optimal benefits. Acknowledging midwifery students' potential to make positive impacts on women's clinical outcomes may prompt more health services to reconceptualise and foster CoCE.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wombi.2021.04.004

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tickle, N., Gamble, J., & Creedy, D. K.
Affiliations
Griffith University (AU)
Corresponding author
Tickle, Nikki
Venue
Women and Birth
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-03
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
184-192
ISSN
1871-5192 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3156786246
Cited by
15
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Women and Birth (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
Keywords
midwifery students, continuity of midwifery care, pregnancy, labor and delivery, episiotomy, perineal tears
MeSH terms
Australia, Continuity of Patient Care, Female, Humans, Midwifery, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review