The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Breastfeeding or breast milk for procedural pain in neonates
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Physiological changes brought about by pain may contribute to the development of morbidity in neonates. Clinical studies have shown reduction in changes in physiological parameters and pain score measurements following pre-emptive analgesic administration in situations where the neonate is experiencing pain or stress. Non-pharmacological measures (such as holding, swaddling and breastfeeding) and pharmacological measures (such as acetaminophen, sucrose and opioids) have been used for this purpose. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of breastfeeding or supplemental breast milk in reducing procedural pain in neonates. The secondary objective was to conduct subgroup analyses based on the type of control intervention, gestational age and the amount of supplemental breast milk given. SEARCH METHODS: We performed a literature search using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 10), MEDLINE (1966 to February 2011), EMBASE (1980 to February 2011), CINAHL (1982 to February 2011), abstracts from the annual meetings of the Society for Pediatric Research (1994 to 2011), and major paediatric pain conference proceedings. We did not apply any language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs of breastfeeding or supplemental breast milk versus no treatment/other measures in neonates were eligible for inclusion in this review. The study must have reported on either physiologic markers of pain or validated pain scores. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We assessed the methodological quality of the trials using the information provided in the studies and by personal communication with the authors. We extracted data on relevant outcomes, estimated the effect size and reported this as a risk ratio (RR), risk difference (RD) and weighted mean difference (MD) as appropriate. MAIN RESULTS: Of twenty eligible studies, ten evaluated breastfeeding and ten evaluated supplemental breast milk. Sixteen studies analysed used heel lance and four used venepuncture as procedure. We noted marked heterogeneity in control intervention and pain assessment measures among the studies. Neonates in the breastfeeding group had statistically a significantly lower increase in heart rate, reduced proportion of crying time and reduced duration of first cry and total crying time compared to positioning (swaddled and placed in a crib), holding by mother, placebo, pacifier use, no intervention or oral sucrose group, or both.Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) scores were significantly lower in the breastfeeding group compared to positioning, placebo or oral sucrose group, or both. However, there was no statistically significant difference in PIPP scores when compared to no intervention. Douleur Aigue Nouveau-ne scores (DAN) were significantly lower in the breastfeeding group compared to the placebo group and the group held in mother's arms, but not when compared to the glucose group. Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) was significantly lower in the breastfeeding group compared to the no intervention group, but there was no difference when compared to the oral sucrose group. The Neonatal Facial Coding System (NFCS) was significantly lower in the breastfeeding group when compared to oral glucose, pacifier use, holding by mother and no intervention, but no difference was found when compared to formula feeding.Supplemental breast milk yielded variable results. Neonates in the supplemental breast milk group had a significantly lower increase in heart rate, a reduction in duration of crying and a lower NFCS compared to the placebo group. Neonates in the supplemental breast milk group had a significantly higher increase in heart rate changes when compared to the sucrose group. Sucrose (in any concentration, i.e. 12.5%, 20%, 25%) was found to reduce the duration of cry when compared to breast milk, as did glycine, pacifier use, rocking, or no intervention. Breast milk was found not to be effective in reducing validated and non-validated pain scores such as NIPS, NFCS, and DAN; only being significantly better when compared to placebo (water) or massage. We did not identify any study that has evaluated safety/effectiveness of repeated administration of breastfeeding or supplemental breast milk for pain relief. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: If available, breastfeeding or breast milk should be used to alleviate procedural pain in neonates undergoing a single painful procedure rather than placebo, positioning or no intervention. Administration of glucose/sucrose had similar effectiveness as breastfeeding for reducing pain. The effectiveness of breast milk for painful procedure should be studied in the preterm population, as there are currently a limited number of studies in the literature that have assessed it's effectiveness in this population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048
Premature Infant Pain Profile: Development and Initial Validation
Stevens, B., Johnston, C., Petryshen, P., & Taddio, A. (1996) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/00002508-199603000-00004 · Cited by 1,172
Pain expression in neonates: facial action and cry
Grunau, R. V. E., & Craig, K. D. (1987) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(87)90073-x · Cited by 1,040
Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures
Stevens, B., Yamada, J., & Ohlsson, A. (2004) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001069.pub2 · Cited by 883
The development of a tool to assess neonatal pain
Lawrence, J., Alcock, D., Kay, J., & McGrath, P. J. (1991) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/0885-3924(91)91127-u · Cited by 806
Consensus Statement for the Prevention and Management of Pain in the Newborn
Anand, K. J. S. (2001) · Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpedi.155.2.173 · Cited by 789
Pain in the preterm neonate: behavioural and physiological indices
Craig, K. D., Whitfield, M. F., Grunau, R. V. E., Linton, J., & Hadjistavropoulos, H. D. (1993) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(93)90162-i · Cited by 481
Randomized Controlled Trials: Questions, Answers, and Musings
Jadad, A. R., & Enkin, M. W. (2007) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470691922 · Cited by 458
Clinical Importance of Pain and Stress in Preterm Neonates
Anand, K. J. S. (1998) · Neonatology · doi:10.1159/000013953 · Cited by 434
Cited by
Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures
Stevens, B., Yamada, J., Ohlsson, A., Haliburton, S., & Shorkey, A. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001069.pub5 · Cited by 567
Metadata
- Authors
- Shah, P. S., Herbozo, C., Aliwalas, L. L., & Shah, V. S.
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-12-12
- Volume
- 2012
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- CD004950-CD004950
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-1858
- OpenAlex
- W1948567892
- Cited by
- 416
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 16.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Breastfeeding or breast milk for procedural pain in neonates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/14651858.cd004950.pub3
- The paper
- Shah, P. S., Herbozo, C., Aliwalas, L. L., & Shah, V. S. (2012). Breastfeeding or breast milk for procedural pain in neonates. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd004950.pub3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.