The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consensus Statement for the Prevention and Management of Pain in the Newborn
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop evidence-based guidelines for preventing or treating neonatal pain and its adverse consequences. Compared with older children and adults, neonates are more sensitive to pain and vulnerable to its long-term effects. Despite the clinical importance of neonatal pain, current medical practices continue to expose infants to repetitive, acute, or prolonged pain. DESIGN: Experts representing several different countries, professional disciplines, and practice settings used systematic reviews, data synthesis, and open discussion to develop a consensus on clinical practices that were supported by published evidence or were commonly used, the latter based on extrapolation of evidence from older age groups. A practical format was used to describe the analgesic management for specific invasive procedures and for ongoing pain in neonates. RESULTS: Recognition of the sources of pain and routine assessments of neonatal pain should dictate the avoidance of recurrent painful stimuli and the use of specific environmental, behavioral, and pharmacological interventions. Individualized care plans and analgesic protocols for specific clinical situations, patients, and health care settings can be developed from these guidelines. By clearly outlining areas where evidence is not available, these guidelines may also stimulate further research. To use the recommended therapeutic approaches, clinicians must be familiar with their adverse effects and the potential for drug interactions. CONCLUSION: Management of pain must be considered an important component of the health care provided to all neonates, regardless of their gestational age or severity of illness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
“Sucrose analgesia”: absorptive mechanism or taste perception?
Ramenghi, L. A., Evans, D. J., & Levene, M. I. (1999) · Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition · doi:10.1136/fn.80.2.f146 · Cited by 170
van Lingen, R. A., Deinum, J. T., Quak, J. M. E., Kuizenga, A. J., van Dam, J. G., Anand, K. J. S., Tibboel, D., & Okken, A. (1999) · Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition · doi:10.1136/fn.80.1.f59 · Cited by 147
Self-citation
Cited by
Novak, I., Morgan, C., Adde, L., Blackman, J., Boyd, R. N., Brunstrom-Hernandez, J., Cioni, G., Damiano, D., Darrah, J., Eliasson, A.-C., et al. (2017) · JAMA Pediatrics · doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1689 · Cited by 1,721
Slater, R., Cornelissen, L., Fabrizi, L., Patten, D., Yoxen, J., Worley, A., Boyd, S., Meek, J., & Fitzgerald, M. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61303-7 · Cited by 355
Summary Proceedings From the Neonatal Pain-Control Group
Anand, K. J. S., Aranda, J. V., Berde, C. B., Buckman, S., Capparelli, E. V., Carlo, W., Hummel, P., Johnston, C. C., Lantos, J., Tutag-Lehr, V., et al. (2006) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2005-0620c · Cited by 276
Self-citationWilliams, M. D., & Lascelles, B. D. X. (2020) · Frontiers in Pediatrics · doi:10.3389/fped.2020.00030 · Cited by 269
Breastfeeding is analgesic in healthy newborns
Gray, L., Miller, L. W., Philipp, B. L., & Blass, E. M. (2002) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.109.4.590 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Anand, K. J. S.
- Venue
- Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2001-02-01
- Volume
- 155
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 173
- ISSN
- 1072-4710 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2131125447
- Cited by
- 789
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 28.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consensus Statement for the Prevention and Management of Pain in the Newborn. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archpedi.155.2.173
- The paper
- Anand, K. J. S. (2001). Consensus Statement for the Prevention and Management of Pain in the Newborn. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.155.2.173
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.