Antioxidants for male subfertility
Abstract
Background Between 30% to 80% of male subfertility cases are considered to be due to the damaging effects of oxidative stress on sperm and 1 man in 20 will be affected by subfertility. Antioxidants are widely available and inexpensive when compared to other fertility treatments and many men are already using these to improve their fertility. It is thought that oral supplementation with antioxidants may improve sperm quality by reducing oxidative stress. Pentoxifylline, a drug that acts like an antioxidant, was also included in this review. Objectives This Cochrane review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of oral supplementation with antioxidants for subfertile male partners in couples seeking fertility assistance. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and AMED databases (from inception until January 2014); trial registers; sources of unpublished literature and reference lists. An updated search was run in August 2014 when potentially eligible studies were placed in 'Studies awaiting assessment'. Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any type or dose of antioxidant supplement (single or combined) taken by the subfertile male partner of a couple seeking fertility assistance with a placebo, no treatment or another antioxidant. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently selected eligible studies, extra…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior trials have been small and of low or very low quality.
“Prior trials have been small and of low or very low quality. (13)”
From The effect of antioxidants on male factor infertility: the Males, Antioxidants, and Infertility (MOXI) randomized clinical trial (2020) · cites this paper as [13]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barratt, C. L. R., Björndahl, L., De Jonge, C. J., Lamb, D. J., Osorio Martini, F., McLachlan, R., Oates, R. D., van der Poel, S., St John, B., Sigman, M., et al. (2017) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmx021 · Cited by 505 · see citing works
Antioxidants for male subfertility
Smits, R. M., Mackenzie-Proctor, R., Yazdani, A., Stankiewicz, M. T., Jordan, V., & Showell, M. G. (2019) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007411.pub4 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Self-citationSteiner, A. Z., Hansen, K. R., Barnhart, K. T., Cedars, M. I., Legro, R. S., Diamond, M. P., Krawetz, S. A., Usadi, R., Baker, V. L., Coward, R. M., et al. (2020) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.11.008 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
“In semen, antioxidants decrease oxidative stress (6), potentially improving sperm motility and reducing DNA fragmentation (7).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAssisted reproductive technology: an overview of Cochrane Reviews
Farquhar, C., & Marjoribanks, J. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010537.pub5 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Should we evaluate and treat sperm DNA fragmentation?
Agarwal, A., Cho, C.-L., & Esteves, S. C. (2016) · Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/gco.0000000000000271 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Maretti, C., & Cavallini, G. (2017) · Andrology · doi:10.1111/andr.12336 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
The diagnosis and management of men with low sperm motility
Lobo, N., & Satchi, M. (2019) · Trends in Urology & Men's Health · doi:10.1002/tre.714 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Showell, M. G., Mackenzie-Proctor, R., Brown, J., Yazdani, A., Stankiewicz, M. T., & Hart, R. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- Auckland City Hospital (NZ)
- Queensland Fertility Group Research Foundation; 55 Little Edward St, Level 2 Boundary Court Spring Hill Brisbane Queensland Australia 4000
- Ashford Specialist Centre Suite 22; 57-59 Anzac Highway Ashford Adelaide SA Australia
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-12-15
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- CD007411-CD007411
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-1858
- OpenAlex
- W4322694772
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 3.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- new_version (2019-03-14)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
- Keywords
- male subfertility, antioxidants, oral supplementation, oxidative stress, semen quality, pentoxifylline, live birth, clinical pregnancy, sperm DNA fragmentation, sperm motility, sperm concentration, varicocele, chronic prostatitis, male infertility treatment, adverse events, quality of evidence, heterogeneity of evidence, risk of bias, GRADE assessment, cost-effectiveness
- MeSH terms
- Abortion, Spontaneous, Antioxidants, DNA Damage, Female, Humans, Infertility, Male, Male, Pregnancy, Sperm Count, Sperm Motility, Spermatozoa, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Oxidative Stress, Pregnancy Rate, Live Birth, DNA Fragmentation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review