Cited by 304Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesTreatment of Major Depression

Antidepressants for agitation and psychosis in dementia

Open access
Seitz, Dallas P, Adunuri, Nikesh, Gill, Sudeep S., Gruneir, Andrea, Herrmann, Nathan, Rochon, Paula·2011·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Agitation and psychosis are common among older adults with dementia and are challenging to manage. At the present time, little is known about the efficacy and safety of antidepressant medications when used to treat these symptoms. OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of antidepressants in treating psychosis and agitation in older adults with Alzheimer's disease, vascular, or mixed dementia. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group's Specialized Register which included Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2009, Issue 3), MEDLINE (January 1950 to October 2009), EMBASE (1980 - October 2009), CINAHL (all dates - October 2009) and PsycINFO (1806 to October 2009). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized, controlled trials of antidepressants (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), tricyclic antidepressants, trazodone, and other antidepressants), compared to either placebo or comparator medications (typical or atypical antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, benzodiazepines, cholinesterase inhibitors, memantine or other medications) for treatment of agitation or psychosis in older adults with dementia. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted trial data. We collected information on efficacy as measured by dementia neuropsychiatric symptom rating scales and adverse effects. Study authors were contacted for additional information. MAIN RESULTS: Nine trials including a total of 692 individuals were included in the review. Five studies compared SSRIs to placebo and two studies were combined in a meta-analysis for the outcome of change in Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) scores. There was a significant difference between antidepressants and placebo on measures of agitation as reported on the change in CMAI total score (mean difference (MD), -0.89, 95% CI, -1.22 to -0.57) although the results were heavily weighted by one large study. There were no significant differences in change in behavioral symptoms of dementia for SSRIs compared to placebo in the one study that reported on changes in the Neuropsychiatric Inventory and Behavioral Pathology in Dementia scales. One study comparing citalopram to placebo found a significant difference in NPS as measured on the Neurobehavioral Rating Scale (NBRS) after controlling for baseline severity NBRS score although the unadjusted mean difference was not statistically significant (MD - 7.70, 95% CI: -16.57 to 1.17). There was no difference in the rates of trial withdrawals due to adverse events for SSRIs compared to placebo for four studies reporting this outcome (relative risk (RR), 1.07, 95% CI: 0.55 to 2.11) or in the number of trial withdrawals due to any cause in the three studies reporting this outcome (RR, 0.91, 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.26). One study compared the SSRI citalopram to the atypical antipsychotic risperidone and found no difference in NBRS scores, trial withdrawals due to any cause or trial withdrawals due to adverse events although the rates of adverse events as measured on the UKU side effect scale total score were lower for citalopram (MD -2.82, 95% CI: -4.94 to -0.70). Three studies compared SSRIs to typical antipsychotics. In meta-analysis of two studies there was no statistically significant differences in changes in CMAI total scores (MD, 4.66, 95% CI: -3.58 to 12.90). There was also no difference in trial withdrawals due to any cause or due to adverse events for SSRIs compared to typical antipsychotics. One study of trazodone compared to placebo did not find any significant difference in change in CMAI total scores (MD, 5.18, 95% CI, -2.86 to 13.22) or trial withdrawals due to any cause (RR, 1.06, 95% CI, 0.54 to 2.09). Two studies comparing trazodone to haloperidol also failed to detect any difference in change in CMAI total scores (MD, 3.28, 95% CI, -3.28 to 9.85) or trial withdrawals due to any cause (RR, 0.79, 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.46). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Currently there are relatively few studies of antidepressants for the treatment of agitation and psychosis in dementia. The SSRIs sertraline and citalopram were associated with a reduction in symptoms of agitation when compared to placebo in two studies. Both SSRIs and trazodone appear to be tolerated reasonably well when compared to placebo, typical antipsychotics and atypical antipsychotics. Future studies involving more subjects are required to determine if SSRIs, trazodone, or other antidepressants are safe and effective treatments for agitation and psychosis in dementia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd008191.pub2

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A review of trials found evidence for a reduction in agitation with sertraline and citalopram compared with placebo (mean difference −0.89, −1.22 to −0.57).

    “A review of such trials found evidence for a reduction in agitation with sertraline and citalopram compared with placebo (mean difference −0.89, −1.22 to −0.57).135”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seitz, D. P., Adunuri, N., Gill, S. S., Gruneir, A., Herrmann, N., & Rochon, P.
Affiliations
  • Queen's University (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Women's College Hospital (CA)
  • Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
  • Women’s College Hospital Research and Innovation Institute (CA)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-02-16
Volume
2011
Issue
2
Pages
CD008191-CD008191
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W1923760566
Cited by
304
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 18
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
antidepressants, dementia, agitation, psychosis, Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, trazodone, citalopram, antipsychotic drugs, neuropsychiatric symptoms, behavioral symptoms, adverse effects, drug safety, older adults, Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory, Neuropsychiatric Inventory
MeSH terms
Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Dementia, Humans, Psychomotor Agitation, Psychotic Disorders, Trazodone, Citalopram, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Risperidone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review