The DOI matches its Crossref record; 121 of the 121 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hysteroscopy for treating subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Observational studies suggest higher pregnancy rates after the hysteroscopic removal of endometrial polyps, submucous fibroids, uterine septum or intrauterine adhesions, which are present in 10% to 15% of women seeking treatment for subfertility. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of the hysteroscopic removal of endometrial polyps, submucous fibroids, uterine septum or intrauterine adhesions suspected on ultrasound, hysterosalpingography, diagnostic hysteroscopy or any combination of these methods in women with otherwise unexplained subfertility or prior to intrauterine insemination (IUI), in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following databases from their inception to 16 April 2018; The Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Studies Online, ; MEDLINE, Embase , CINAHL , and other electronic sources of trials including trial registers, sources of unpublished literature, and reference lists. We handsearched the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) conference abstracts and proceedings (from 1 January 2014 to 12 May 2018) and we contacted experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised comparison between operative hysteroscopy versus control for unexplained subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities.Randomised comparison between operative hysteroscopy versus control for suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities prior to medically assisted reproduction.Primary outcomes were live birth and hysteroscopy complications. Secondary outcomes were pregnancy and miscarriage. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion and risk of bias, and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information. MAIN RESULTS: Two studies met the inclusion criteria.1. Randomised comparison between operative hysteroscopy versus control for unexplained subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities.In women with otherwise unexplained subfertility and submucous fibroids, we were uncertain whether hysteroscopic myomectomy improved the clinical pregnancy rate compared to expectant management (odds ratio (OR) 2.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97 to 6.17; P = 0.06, 94 women; very low-quality evidence). We are uncertain whether hysteroscopic myomectomy improves the miscarriage rate compared to expectant management (OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.47 to 5.00; P = 0.47, 94 women; very low-quality evidence). We found no data on live birth or hysteroscopy complication rates. We found no studies in women with endometrial polyps, intrauterine adhesions or uterine septum for this randomised comparison.2. Randomised comparison between operative hysteroscopy versus control for suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities prior to medically assisted reproduction.The hysteroscopic removal of polyps prior to IUI may have improved the clinical pregnancy rate compared to diagnostic hysteroscopy only: if 28% of women achieved a clinical pregnancy without polyp removal, the evidence suggested that 63% of women (95% CI 45% to 89%) achieved a clinical pregnancy after the hysteroscopic removal of the endometrial polyps (OR 4.41, 95% CI 2.45 to 7.96; P < 0.00001, 204 women; low-quality evidence). We found no data on live birth, hysteroscopy complication or miscarriage rates in women with endometrial polyps prior to IUI. We found no studies in women with submucous fibroids, intrauterine adhesions or uterine septum prior to IUI or in women with all types of suspected uterine cavity abnormalities prior to IVF/ICSI. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Uncertainty remains concerning an important benefit with the hysteroscopic removal of submucous fibroids for improving the clinical pregnancy rates in women with otherwise unexplained subfertility. The available low-quality evidence suggests that the hysteroscopic removal of endometrial polyps suspected on ultrasound in women prior to IUI may improve the clinical pregnancy rate compared to simple diagnostic hysteroscopy. More research is needed to measure the effectiveness of the hysteroscopic treatment of suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities in women with unexplained subfertility or prior to IUI, IVF or ICSI.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
3 retracted
Effects of the position of fibroids on fertility
Casini, M. L., Rossi, F., Agostini, R., & Unfer, V. (2006) · Gynecological Endocrinology · doi:10.1080/09513590600604673 · Cited by 343
RetractedShokeir, T. A., Mm, E.-S., Yousef, H., Allam, A., & Sadek, E. F. (2009) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.075 · Cited by 98
RetractedEl-Khayat, W. M., ElSadek, M. M., & Saber, W. (2015) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.08.025 · Cited by 33
RetractedMeasuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration
Higgins, J., Green, S. R., & Higgins, J. (2008) · Cited by 5,544
Boivin, J., Bunting, L., Collins, J. A., & Nygren, K. G. (2007) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dem046 · Cited by 2,437
Zegers-Hochschild, F., Adamson, G. D., de Mouzon, J., Ishihara, O., Mansour, R., Nygren, K., Sullivan, E., & Vanderpoel, S. (2009) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.009 · Cited by 1,835
Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Modarresi, O. A. F., & Shakibaie, M. M. M. R. (2015) · Cited by 1,111
Fibroids and infertility: an updated systematic review of the evidence
Pritts, E. A., Parker, W. H., & Olive, D. L. (2009) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.051 · Cited by 913
Cited by
Diagnosis and Management of Infertility: A Review
Carson, S. A., & Kallen, A. N. (2021) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2021.4788 · Cited by 1,294
Hysteroscopy for treating subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities
Bosteels, J., van Wessel, S., Weyers, S., Broekmans, F. J., D'Hooghe, T. M., Bongers, M. Y., & Mol, B. W. J. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009461.pub4 · Cited by 176
Self-citationRecurrent MiscarriageGreen‐top Guideline No. 17
Regan, L., Rai, R., Saravelos, S., Li, T., & the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2023) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.17515 · Cited by 158
Glucocorticoid therapy and ocular hypertension
Dibas, A., & Yorio, T. (2016) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2016.06.018 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Bosteels, J., Kasius, J., Weyers, S., Broekmans, F. J., Mol, B. W. J., & D'Hooghe, T. M.
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-02-21
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- CD009461-CD009461
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-1858
- OpenAlex
- W1866972542
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 121
- FWCI
- 32.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hysteroscopy for treating subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/14651858.cd009461.pub3
- The paper
- Bosteels, J., Kasius, J., Weyers, S., Broekmans, F. J., Mol, B. W. J., & D'Hooghe, T. M. (2015). Hysteroscopy for treating subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd009461.pub3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.