The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Endometrial injury in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Implantation of an embryo within the endometrial cavity is a critical step in assisted reproductive techniques (ART). Previous research has suggested that endometrial injury - intentional damage to the endometrium - can increase the probability of pregnancy in women undergoing ART. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of endometrial injury performed before embryo transfer in women undergoing ART. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group (MDSG) Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Latin American Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) and ClinicalTrials.gov. The original search was performed in November 2011, and further searches were done in March 2014 and January 2015. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing intentional endometrial injury before embryo transfer in women undergoing ART, versus no intervention or a sham procedure. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two independent review authors screened studies and extracted data which were checked by a third review author. Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias. We contacted and corresponded with study investigators as required and analysed data using risk ratio (RR) and a random-effects model. We assessed the quality of the evidence by using GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria. MAIN RESULTS: We included 14 trials that included 1063 women in the intervention groups and 1065 women in the control groups. Thirteen studies compared endometrial injury performed between day 7 of the previous cycle and day 7 of the embryo transfer (ET) cycle versus no injury, and one study compared endometrial injury on the day of oocyte retrieval versus no injury. Overall, eight of the 14 included studies were deemed to be at high risk of bias in at least one domain.In studies comparing endometrial injury performed between day 7 of the previous cycle and day 7 of the ET cycle versus no intervention or a sham procedure, endometrial injury was associated with an increase in live birth or ongoing pregnancy rate: RR 1.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08 to 1.85; P value 0.01; nine RCTs; 1496 women; I² = 53%; moderate-quality evidence. In other words, moderate-quality evidence suggests that if 26% of women achieve live birth without endometrial injury, between 28% and 48% will achieve live birth with endometrial injury. A sensitivity analysis removing the studies at high risk of bias showed no difference in effect.There was no evidence of an effect on miscarriage, however the evidence is of low-quality: RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.53; P value 0.06; eight RCTs; 500 clinical pregnancies; I² = 10%; low-quality evidence.Endometrial injury was also associated with an increased clinical pregnancy rate: RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.61; P value 0.002; 13 RCTs; 1972 women; I² = 45%; moderate-quality evidence. This suggests that if 30% of women achieve clinical pregnancy without endometrial injury, between 33% and 48% will achieve clinical pregnancy with this intervention.Endometrial injury was associated with increased pain, however the evidence was of very low quality. One study reported pain on a VAS scale: MD 4.60, 95% CI 3.98 to 5.22; P value < 0.00001; one RCT; 158 women. Two studies reported the number of pain complaints after the procedure; one recorded no events in either group, and the other reported that endometrial injury increased pain complaints: OR 8.65, 95% CI 2.49 to 30.10; P value 0.0007; one RCT; 101 women.Results from the only randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing endometrial injury on the day of oocyte retrieval versus no injury, reported that this endometrial injury markedly decreased live birth (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.69; P value 0.004; 156 women; low-quality evidence) and clinical pregnancy (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.71; P value 0.003; one RCT; 156 women; low-quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Moderate-quality evidence indicates that endometrial injury performed between day 7 of the previous cycle and day 7 of the embryo transfer (ET) cycle is associated with an improvement in live birth and clinical pregnancy rates in women with more than two previous embryo transfers. There is no evidence of an effect on miscarriage, multiple pregnancy or bleeding. The procedure is mildly painful. Endometrial injury on the day of oocyte retrieval is associated with a reduction of clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates.Although current evidence suggests some benefit of endometrial injury, we need evidence from well-designed trials that avoid instrumentation of the uterus in the preceding three months, do not cause endometrial damage in the control group, stratify the results for women with and without recurrent implantation failure (RIF) an
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“although to date RCTs and meta-analyses in this patient group have failed to show a reduction in miscarriage rates.205,206”
From Recurrent MiscarriageGreen‐top Guideline No. 17 (2023) · cites this paper as [205]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Shohayeb, A., & El-Khayat, W. M. (2012) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.06.029 · Cited by 115
RetractedZegers-Hochschild, F., Adamson, G. D., de Mouzon, J., Ishihara, O., Mansour, R. T., Nygren, K. G., Sullivan, E. A., & Vanderpoel, S. (2009) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.009 · Cited by 1,898
Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Modarresi, O. A. F., & Shakibaie, M. M. M. R. (2015) · Cited by 1,111
Zegers-Hochschild, F., Adamson, G. D., de Mouzon, J., Ishihara, O., Mansour, R., Nygren, K., Sullivan, E., van der Poel, S., & WHO, O. B. O. I. A. (2009) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dep343 · Cited by 1,043
Barash, A., Dekel, N., Fieldust, S., Segal, I., Schechtman, E., & Granot, I. (2003) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00345-5 · Cited by 484
Gnainsky, Y., Granot, I., Aldo, P. B., Barash, A., Or, Y., Schechtman, E., Mor, G., & Dekel, N. (2010) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.02.022 · Cited by 385
What exactly do we mean by ‘recurrent implantation failure’? A systematic review and opinion
Polański, Ł., Baumgarten, M. N., Quenby, S. M., Brosens, J. J., Campbell, B. K., & Raine‐Fenning, N. (2014) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.12.006 · Cited by 276
Self-citationPotdar, N., Gelbaya, T. A., & Nardo, L. G. (2012) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.08.005 · Cited by 247
Zhou, L., Li, R., Wang, R., Huang, H.-X., & Zhong, K. (2007) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.064 · Cited by 246
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection
Steirteghem, A. V., Nagy, Z. P., Liu, J., Joris, H., Verheyen, G., Smitz, J. E. J., Tournaye, H. J., Liebaers, I., & Devroey, P. (1994) · Baillière s Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.1016/s0950-3552(05)80025-2 · Cited by 241
Ubaldi, F., Bourgain, C., Tournaye, H. J., Smitz, J. E. J., Steirteghem, A. V., & Devroey, P. (1997) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(97)80080-5 · Cited by 229
Cumulative Birth Rates with Linked Assisted Reproductive Technology Cycles
Luke, B., Brown, M. B., Wantman, E., Lederman, A., Gibbons, W. E., Schattman, G. L., Løbo, R. A., Leach, R. E., & Stern, J. E. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1110238 · Cited by 224
Ethical issues in stopping randomized trials early because of apparent benefit.
Mueller, P. S., Montori, V. M., Bassler, D., Koenig, B. A., & Guyatt, G. H. (2007) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-146-12-200706190-00009 · Cited by 202
Merchant, R., & Allahbadia, G. (2014) · Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. eBooks · doi:10.5005/jp/books/12299 · Cited by 197
Common statistical errors in the design and analysis of subfertility trials
Vail, A. (2003) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deg133 · Cited by 172
Narvekar, S., Gupta, N., Shetty, N., Kottur, A., Srinivas, M., & Rao, K. (2010) · Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences · doi:10.4103/0974-1208.63116 · Cited by 159
Karimzadeh, M., ROZBAHANI, M. A., & Tabibnejad, N. (2009) · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1479-828x.2009.01076.x · Cited by 154
Yeung, T. W. Y., Chai, J., Li, R., Lee, V. C. Y., Ho, P. C., & Ng, E. H. Y. (2014) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deu213 · Cited by 150
Karimzade, M. A., Oskouian, H., Ahmadi, S., & Oskouian, L. (2009) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-009-1166-1 · Cited by 137
Nastri, C. O., Ferriani, R. A., Raine‐Fenning, N. J., & Martins, W. P. (2013) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.12539 · Cited by 129
Self-citationLocal endometrial injury and IVF outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
El‐Toukhy, T., Sunkara, S. K., & Khalaf, Y. (2012) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.06.012 · Cited by 126
M, H. N., Thorat, R. M., Gaikwad, D., & Jadhav, S. (2011) · Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry · Cited by 116
Local injury to the endometrium: its effect on implantation
Li, R., & Hao, G. (2009) · Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/gco.0b013e32832a0654 · Cited by 112
Promoting implantation by local injury to the endometrium
Almog, B., Shalom‐Paz, E., Dufort, D., & Tulandi, T. (2010) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.075 · Cited by 106
Hysteroscopy prior to the first IVF cycle: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Pundir, J., Pundir, V., Omanwa, K., Khalaf, Y., & El‐Toukhy, T. (2013) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.09.025 · Cited by 102
Baum, M., Yerushalmi, G., Maman, E., Kedem, A., Machtinger, R., Hourvitz, A., & Dor, J. (2012) · Gynecological Endocrinology · doi:10.3109/09513590.2011.650750 · Cited by 87
Jennings, J. C., Moreland, K., & Peterson, C. M. (1996) · Drugs · doi:10.2165/00003495-199652030-00002 · Cited by 76
Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2006 results from the Canadian ART Register
Gunby, J. L., Bissonnette, F., Librach, C. L., & Cowan, L. (2009) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.102 · Cited by 71
Lass, A., Peat, D., Avery, S., & Brinsden, P. R. (1998) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/13.11.3203 · Cited by 70
Endometrial scratching for women with previous IVF failure undergoing IVF treatment
Gibreel, A., Eladawi, N., Elgindy, E. A., Al-Inany, H. G., Allakkany, N. S., & Tournaye, H. J. (2015) · Gynecological Endocrinology · doi:10.3109/09513590.2014.994603 · Cited by 65
Self-citationSiristatidis, C. S., Vrachnis, N., Vogiatzi, P., Chrelias, C. G., Retamar, A. M. Q., Bettocchi, S., & Glujovsky, D. (2014) · Reproductive Sciences · doi:10.1177/1933719114525270 · Cited by 62
Junovich, G., Mayer, Y., Azpiroz, A., Daher, S., Iglesias, A., Zylverstein, C., Gentile, T., Pasqualini, S., Markert, U. R., & Gutiérrez, G. (2010) · American Journal of Reproductive Immunology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0897.2010.00892.x · Cited by 57
Güven, S., Kart, C., Unsal, M. A., Yildirim, O., Odacı, E., & Yuluğ, E. (2013) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.11.005 · Cited by 46
Safdarian, L., Movahedi, S., Aleyasine, A., Aghahosaini, M., Fallah, P., & Rezaiian, Z. (2011) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 24
İnal, H. A., İnal, Z. H. Ö., & Görkemli, H. (2012) · Electronic Journal of General Medicine · doi:10.29333/ejgm/82435 · Cited by 20
Nastri, C. O., Teixeira, D. M., & Martins, W. P. (2013) · Gynecological Endocrinology · doi:10.3109/09513590.2012.760193 · Cited by 16
Self-citationCytomorphometric analysis and surface ultrastructure of developing decidua
Garris, D. R., & Garris, B. L. (2003) · Tissue and Cell · doi:10.1016/s0040-8166(03)00036-3 · Cited by 16
Endometrial scratching for women with repeated implantation failure
Nastri, C. O., Polański, Ł., Raine‐Fenning, N., & Martins, W. P. (2014) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deu257 · Cited by 14
Self-citationIs There A Place for Adjuvant Therapy in IVF?
Segev, Y., Carp, H., Auslender, R., & Dirnfeld, M. (2010) · Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey · doi:10.1097/ogx.0b013e3181dbc53f · Cited by 12
Yoldemir, T., & Erenus, M. (2010) · Gynecological Endocrinology · doi:10.3109/09513590.2010.491927 · Cited by 11
Matsumoto, Y., Yata, M., Ogata, H., Ogata, S., Kokeguchi, S., & Shiotani, M. (2014) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.192 · Cited by 2
The overlooked endometrial injury underlying hysteroscopy procedures
Nastri, C. O., Teixeira, D. M., Ferriani, R. A., & Martins, W. P. (2014) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.03.021 · Cited by 2
Self-citationResponse: The overlooked endometrial injury underlying hysteroscopy procedures
El‐Toukhy, T., & Pundir, J. (2014) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.03.023 · Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Karim Zadeh Meybodi, 2008, Effect of endometrium local injury on pregnancy outcome in patients with IVF/ICSI, Human Reproduction, 23(Suppl 1), i126
- Nastri, 2011, The effect of local injury to the endometrium performed previously to the ovulation induction in assisted reproduction techniques: preliminary report, JBRA Assisted Reproduction, 15, 54
- Yeung, 2014, The effect of endometrial injury on ongoing pregnancy rate in unselected subfertile women undergoing in-vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled trial, Human Reproduction, 10.1093/humrep/deu213 · DOI
- Higgins, 2011, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [Version 5.1.0]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bashiri, A., Halper, K. I., & Orvieto, R. (2018) · Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology · doi:10.1186/s12958-018-0414-2 · Cited by 601
Niederberger, C., Pellicer, A., Cohen, J., Gardner, D. K., Palermo, G. D., O’Neill, C. L., Chow, S., Rosenwaks, Z., Cobo, A. C., Swain, J. E., et al. (2018) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.005 · Cited by 411
Fertile ground: human endometrial programming and lessons in health and disease
Evans, J., Salamonsen, L. A., Winship, A., Menkhorst, E. M., Nie, G., Gargett, C. E., & Dimitriadis, E. (2016) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/nrendo.2016.116 · Cited by 378
Endometritis: new time, new concepts
Kitaya, K., Takeuchi, T., Mizuta, S., Matsubayashi, H., & Ishikawa, T. (2018) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.04.012 · Cited by 308
What exactly do we mean by ‘recurrent implantation failure’? A systematic review and opinion
Polański, Ł., Baumgarten, M. N., Quenby, S. M., Brosens, J. J., Campbell, B. K., & Raine‐Fenning, N. (2014) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.12.006 · Cited by 276
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nastri, C., Lensen, S., Gibreel, A., Raine-Fenning, N., Ferriani, R., Bhattacharya, S., & Martins, W.
- Affiliations
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- Mansoura University (EG)
- Aberdeen Maternity Hospital (GB)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-03-22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- CD009517-CD009517
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-1858
- OpenAlex
- W1488278893
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 16
- FWCI
- 5.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- new_version (2021-06-10)
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
- Keywords
- endometrial injury, assisted reproduction, embryo transfer, endometrial scratching, live birth rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, subfertility, endometrial receptivity, pregnancy outcomes, oocyte retrieval
- MeSH terms
- Abortion, Spontaneous, Endometrium, Female, Humans, Ovulation Induction, Embryo Implantation, Pregnancy, Pregnancy, Multiple, Probability, Time Factors, Odds Ratio, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Pregnancy Rate, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted, Live Birth, Oocyte Retrieval
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
