Cited by 49Chronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Interventions for weight loss in people with chronic kidney disease who are overweight or obese

Open access
Conley, Marguerite M, McFarlane, Catherine M, Johnson, David W, Kelly, Jaimon T, Campbell, Katrina L, MacLaughlin, Helen L·2021·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obesity and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are highly prevalent worldwide and result in substantial health care costs. Obesity is a predictor of incident CKD and progression to kidney failure. Whether weight loss interventions are safe and effective to impact on disease progression and clinical outcomes, such as death remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: This review aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intentional weight loss interventions in overweight and obese adults with CKD; including those with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) being treated with dialysis, kidney transplantation, or supportive care. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 14 December 2020 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs of more than four weeks duration, reporting on intentional weight loss interventions, in individuals with any stage of CKD, designed to promote weight loss as one of their primary stated goals, in any health care setting. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed study eligibility and extracted data. We applied the Cochrane 'Risk of Bias' tool and used the GRADE process to assess the certainty of evidence. We estimated treatment effects using random-effects meta-analysis. Results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes together with 95% confidence intervals (CI) or mean differences (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) for continuous outcomes or in descriptive format when meta-analysis was not possible. MAIN RESULTS: We included 17 RCTs enrolling 988 overweight or obese adults with CKD. The weight loss interventions and comparators across studies varied. We categorised comparisons into three groups: any weight loss intervention versus usual care or control; any weight loss intervention versus dietary intervention; and surgical intervention versus non-surgical intervention. Methodological quality was varied, with many studies providing insufficient information to accurately judge the risk of bias. Death (any cause), cardiovascular events, successful kidney transplantation, nutritional status, cost effectiveness and economic analysis were not measured in any of the included studies. Across all 17 studies many clinical parameters, patient-centred outcomes, and adverse events were not measured limiting comparisons for these outcomes. In studies comparing any weight loss intervention to usual care or control, weight loss interventions may lead to weight loss or reduction in body weight post intervention (6 studies, 180 participants: MD -3.69 kg, 95% CI -5.82 to -1.57; follow-up: 5 weeks to 12 months, very low-certainty evidence). In very low certainty evidence any weight loss intervention had uncertain effects on body mass index (BMI) (4 studies, 100 participants: MD -2.18 kg/m², 95% CI -4.90 to 0.54), waist circumference (2 studies, 53 participants: MD 0.68 cm, 95% CI -7.6 to 6.24), proteinuria (4 studies, 84 participants: 0.29 g/day, 95% CI -0.76 to 0.18), systolic (4 studies, 139 participants: -3.45 mmHg, 95% CI -9.99 to 3.09) and diastolic blood pressure (4 studies, 139 participants: -2.02 mmHg, 95% CI -3.79 to 0.24). Any weight loss intervention made little or no difference to total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, and inflammation, but may lower low density lipoprotein cholesterol. There was little or no difference between any weight loss interventions (lifestyle or pharmacological) compared to dietary-only weight loss interventions for weight loss, BMI, waist circumference, proteinuria, and systolic blood pressure, however diastolic blood pressure was probably reduced. Furthermore, studies comparing the efficacy of different types of dietary interventions failed to find a specific dietary intervention to be superior for weight loss or a reduction in BMI. Surgical interventions probably reduced body weight (1 study, 11 participants: MD -29.50 kg, 95% CI -36.4 to -23.35), BMI (2 studies, 17 participants: MD -10.43 kg/m², 95% CI -13.58 to -7.29), and waist circumference (MD -30.00 cm, 95% CI -39.93 to -20.07) when compared to non-surgical weight loss interventions after 12 months of follow-up. Proteinuria and blood pressure were not reported. All results across all comparators should be interpreted with caution due to the small number of studies, very low quality of evidence and heterogeneity across interventions and comparators. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: All types of weight loss interventions had uncertain effects on death and cardiovascular events among overweight and obese adults with CKD as no studies reported these outcome measures. Non-surgical weight loss interventions (pre

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd013119.pub2

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 100 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Shai I. The effect of low-carb, Mediterranean and low-fat diets on renal function: a 2-year dietary intervention randomized controlled trial (DIRECT) [abstract]. Obesity Facts 2012;5(Suppl 1):19. [CENTRAL: CN-00868666] [EMBASE: 70781690] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alsouqi A, Taylor JM, Ellis CD, Bian A, Stewart TG, Robinson-Cohen C, et al. Effects of diet and exercise on adipocytokine levels in patients with moderate to severe CKD [abstract no: TH-PO444]. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2017;28(Abstract Suppl):214. [EMBASE: 633698382] [Google Scholar]
  3. Taylor JM, Alsouqi A, Robinson-Cohen C, Ellis CD, Headley SA, Tuttle KR, et al. Supervised exercise intervention and overall physical activity in individuals with moderate to severe CKD [abstract no: TH-PO520]. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2017;28(Abstract Suppl):234. [EMBASE: 633697678] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kittiskulnam P, Kanjanabuch T, Chancharoenthana W, Praditpornsilpa K, Eiam-ong S, Tungsanga K. The beneficial effects of body weight reduction in overweight patients with proteinuric immunoglobulin A nephropathy: a randomized controlled trial [abstract no: FR-PO787]. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2013;24(Abstracts):544A. [CENTRAL: CN-01657790] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Beetham KS, Howden EJ, Krishnasamy R, Isbel NM, Coombes JS. Effects of a 3-year lifestyle intervention on cardiorespiratory fitness and exercise capacity in patients with chronic kidney disease [abstract no: 017]. Nephrology 2015;30(Suppl 3):21. [EMBASE: 71995806] [Google Scholar]
  6. Howden EJ, Coombes J, Leano R, Isbel N, Marwick T. Effect of exercise and lifestyle intervention on LV and vascular function in patients with chronic kidney disease: a randomized controlled trial [abstract no: 3119]. European Heart Journal 2012;33(Suppl 1):515. [Google Scholar]
  7. Howden EJ, Coombes J, Petchey W, Isbel N. A one-year lifestyle intervention improves myocardial function and exercise capacity in patients with chronic kidney disease [abstract no: SA-OR376]. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2011;22(Abstracts):90A. [Google Scholar]
  8. Howden EJ, Leano R, Petchey W, Isbel NM, Coombes JS, Marwick TH. A one-year lifestyle intervention improves myocardial function and exercise capacity in patients with chronic kidney disease [abstract no: 062]. Nephrology 2011;16(Suppl 1):39-40. [EMBASE: 70532410] [Google Scholar]
  9. Small DM, Beetham KS, Howden EJ, Brisky DR, Johnson DW, Isbel NM, et al. Effect of exercise and lifestyle intervention on oxidative stress in chronic kidney disease [abstract no: 049]. Nephrology 2015;30(Suppl 3):30-1. [EMBASE: 71995838] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bast J, Qureshi S, Moinuddin I, Collins E, Jelinek C, Cooper C, et al. A randomized controlled trial of aerobic exercise in obese diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease [abstract no: PUB652]. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2008;19(Abstracts Issue):960A. [CENTRAL: CN-00740547] [Google Scholar]
  11. Leehey DJ, Moinuddin I, Bast JP, Qureshi S, Jelinek CS, Cooper C, et al. Aerobic exercise in obese diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease: a randomized, controlled feasibility study [abstract no: F-PO1328]. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2009;20(Abstract Suppl):417A. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kanneganti VK, Collins E, Butler J, O'Connell S, Jelinek C, McBurney C, et al. Impaired physical fitness in obese diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease [abstract no: SA-PO368]. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2013;24(Abstract Suppl):710A. [Google Scholar]
  13. Leehey DJ, Collins E, Kramer HJ, Cooper C, Butler J, McBurney C, et al. Structured exercise in obese diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease: a randomized controlled trial (NCT01036490) [abstract no: FR-PO771]. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2014;25(Abstract Suppl):545A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Leehey DJ, Collins E, Kramer HJ, Cooper C, Butler J, McBurney C, et al. Structured exercise in obese diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease: a randomized controlled trial (NCT01036490) [abstract no: TH-PO675]. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2015;26(Abstract Suppl):244A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Leehey DJ, Collins E, Kramer HJ, Cooper C, Butler J, McBurney C, et al. Structured exercise in obese diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease: a randomized controlled trial [abstract no: FR-PO830]. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2016;27(Abstract Suppl):558A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Maclaughin HL, Hall WL, Patel AG, Blacklock RM, Phanish M, Swift P, et al. Kidney function, adipokines, and quality of life after weight loss surgery in obese patients with stages 3-4 CKD: a randomised controlled pilot study [abstract no: O16]. In: UK Kidney Week; 2014 Apr 29-2 May; Glasgow, UK. 2014. [DOI] [PubMed]
  17. Maclaughlin HL, Hall WL, Patel AG, Blacklock RM, Macdougall IC. Kidney function, adipokines, and quality of life after weight loss surgery in obese patients with stages 3-4 chronic kidney disease: a randomized controlled pilot study [abstract no: FR-PO785]. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2013;24(Abstract Suppl):543A. [Google Scholar]
  18. Morales E, Valero M, Leon M, Diaz O, Lopez-Pardo C, Vargas C, et al. Anitproteinuric effect of weight loss in obese patients with chronic proteinuric nephropathies [abstract]. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2001;12(Program & Abstracts):231A. [CENTRAL: CN-00446824] [Google Scholar]
  19. Morales E, Valero MA, Hernandez E, Leon M, Praga M. Antiproteinuric effect of weight loss in obese patients with chronic proteinuric nephropathies [abstract no: M243]. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2002;17(Abstracts Suppl 1):117. [CENTRAL: CN-00550621] [Google Scholar]
  20. Teplan V, Schuck O, Poledne R, Vitko S. Effective treatment of obesity reduces the risk after renal transplantation [abstract no: O134]. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2002;17(Suppl 1):40. [CENTRAL: CN-00509504] [Google Scholar]
  21. Teplan V, Mareckova O, Vyhnankova I, Valkovsky I, Lopatnik M, Racek J, et al. Asymmetric dimethylarginine and pentosidin in patients with chronic kidney disease and obesity: a randomized controlled trial. Aktuality v Nefrologii 2008;14(4):185-90. [CENTRAL: CN-00791071] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tzvetanov I, D'Amico G, Georgiev G, Jeon H, Garcia-Roca R, Benedetti E, et al. Combined robotic kidney transplantation and sleeve gastrectomy in obese recipients: Initial results from prospective randomized study [abstract]. American Journal of Transplantation 2015;15(Suppl 3). [EMBASE: 71953189] [Google Scholar]
  23. Woolf K, Ganguzza L, Pompeii ML, Hu L, St-Jules DE, Jagannathan R, et al. Weight loss and self-efficacy in obese/overweight patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease in a lifestyle intervention pilot study [abstract]. FASEB journal 2017;31(1 Suppl 1). [EMBASE: 616960059] [Google Scholar]
  24. Corpeleijn E, Klaassen G, Zelle DM, Dijkema D, Van Vliet I, Bemelman FJ, et al. Lifestyle intervention in renal transplant recipients: A multicenter, randomized clinical trial [abstract]. American Journal of Transplantation 2019;19(Suppl 3):365. [EMBASE: 628454289] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zeeuw D, Akizawa T, Audhya P, Bakris GL, Chin M, Christ-Schmidt H, et al. Bardoxolone methyl in type 2 diabetes and stage 4 chronic kidney disease. New England Journal of Medicine 2013;369(26):2492-503. [MEDLINE: ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Klein C, Noertersheuser P, Mensing S, Teuscher N, Meyer C, Dumas E, et al. Exposure-response analyses of bardoxolone methyl safety and efficacy and clinical trial simulations to inform phase III dose selection [abstract]. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2012;27(Suppl 2):ii403. [EMBASE: 70766487] [Google Scholar]
  27. Chin M, Goldsberry A, Hebbar S, Meyer C, Audhya P, Toto R, et al. Bardoxolone methyl acutely reduces serum magnesium in stage 3B and 4 CKD patients with type 2 diabetes without any adverse effect on QT interval [abstract]. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2012;27(Suppl 2):ii12. [EMBASE: 70766563] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pergola P, Chin M, Goldsberry A, Hebbar S, Meyer C, Audhya P. Weight loss in obese, stage 3B and 4 CKD patients with type 2 diabetes given bardoxolone methyl [abstract]. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2012;27(Suppl 2):ii12. [EMBASE: 70766564] [Google Scholar]
  29. Rossing P, Block G, Chertow G, Chin M, Goldsberry A, McCullough P, et al. Effect of bardoxolone methyl treatment on urinary albumin in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease-post-hoc analysis from BEAM and BEACON [abstract]. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2018;33(Suppl 1):i27. [EMBASE: 622605449] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rossing P, Chin M, Deen WM, Hebbar S, Potts S, Audhya P, et al. Bardoxolone methyl and albuminuria in type 2 diabetes patients with CKD [abstract no: SA-PO107]. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2012;23(Abstract Suppl):660A. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ahn SY, Kim DK, Han SS, Park JH, Choi B, Lim CS, et al. Weight loss has an additive effect on the anti-proteinuric effects of angiotensin II receptor blockers in hypertensive patients with CKD [abstract no: FR-PO502]. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2017;28(Abstract Suppl):531. [EMBASE: 633703439] [Google Scholar]
  32. Chin HJ, Lim CS. Weight reduction has an additive effect on the anti-albuminuric effect of angiotensin II hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease [abstract no: TH-PO556]. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2015;26(Abstract Suppl):214A. [Google Scholar]
  33. Lee A, Chin HJ. Long term effects of intensive low salt diet education on deterioration of glomerular filtration among non-diabetic hypertensive patients with CKD [abstract no: FR-PO389]. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2017;28(Abstract Suppl):501. [Google Scholar]
  34. Lim CS, Hwang JH, Chin HJ, Kim DK, Kim S, Park JH, et al. Effects of low sodium intake on the antiproteinuric efficacy of olmesartan in hypertensive patients with albuminuria (ESPECIAL): a randomized clinical trial [abstract no: 168]. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2014;29(Suppl 3):iii376. [EMBASE: 71492549] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lim CS, Hwang JH, Chin HJ, Kim S, Choi BS. Effects of low sodium intake on the anti-proteinuric efficacy of olmesartan in hypertensive patients with albuminuria [abstract no: SA-PO155]. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2013;24(Abstract Suppl):659A. [Google Scholar]
  36. Jasiak-Panek N, Thielke J, Progar K, Chen J, Adams C, Benedetti E, et al. An analysis of tacrolimus XL dosing in obese kidney transplant recipients [abstract]. American Journal of Transplantation 2017;17(Suppl 3):739. [EMBASE: 615705137] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kincaid-Smith P, Fairley K, Packham D. Comparison of the effect of 50% increase in angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) with a combination of candesartan and ACEI on proteinuria and blood pressure in chronic renal disease [abstract no: A0392]. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2001;12(Program & Abstracts):75A. [CENTRAL: CN-00446096] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kincaid-Smith P, Fairley K. A fall in urine protein with combined angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and AII receptor antagonist (AIIRA) treatment predicts a good outcome at three years in patients with chronic renal disease with continuing reduction in urine protein levels. Diabetic and obese patients with a poor response to combined ACEI and AIIRA treatment have a poor outcome [abstract no: M419]. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2003;18(Suppl 4):131. [CENTRAL: CN-00446094] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kincaid-Smith PS, Fairley KF, Packham D. Randomised controlled crossover study of the effect on proteinuria of adding an agiotensin 11-receptor antagonist (ARA) to an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) [abstract]. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2000;11(Sept):349A. [CENTRAL: CN-00626048] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kincaid-Smith PS, Fairley KF. A fall in urine protein with combined angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and AII receptor antagonist (AIIRA) treatment predicts a good outcome at three years in patients with chronic renal disease (mean serum creatinine level of 0.18 mmols/litre mean urinary protein level of 2.3 grams/24 hours). Diabetic and obese patients with poor response to combined ACEI and AIIRA treatment have a poor outcome [abstract no: PUB059]. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2003;14(Nov):786A. [Google Scholar]
  41. Teplan V, Schuck O, Poledne R, Stollova M, Skibova J, Vitko S. Obesity is a high-risk factor after renal transplantation [abstract]. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2000;15(9):A259. [CENTRAL: CN-00461848] [Google Scholar]
  42. Teplan V, Schuck O, Poledne R, Vitko S, Stollova M. Hyperlipidemia following renal transplantation: the effects of obesity, age and sex [abstract no: 11]. Kidney & Blood Pressure Research 2000;24(2):133-4. [CENTRAL: CN-00509505] [Google Scholar]
  43. Teplan V, Schuck O, Hyanek J, Poledne R, Vitko S. Effective treatment of hyperhomocysteinemia and obesity reduces the risk after renal transplantation [abstract no: T711]. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2003;18(Suppl 4):509. [CENTRAL: CN-00447972] [Google Scholar]
  44. Teplan V, Mareckova O, Racek J, Haluzik M, Kudla M, Stollova M, et al. Pentosidine and cardiovascular disease in obese renal transplant patients [abstract no: SA-PO422]. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2007;18(Abstracts):433A. [CENTRAL: CN-00740449] [Google Scholar]
  45. Zingerman B, Erman A, Itach SBS, Ori Y, Herman-Edelstein M, Gafter U, et al. Acetazolamide reduces glomerular hyperfiltration and renal plasma flow in obese subjects: a randomized controlled trial [abstract no: FR-PO1038]. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2012;23(Abstract Suppl):607A. [Google Scholar]
  46. West-Thielke P, Tulla KA, Okoye OT, Almario Alvarez JA, Spaggiari M, Tzvetanov IG, et al. Simultaneous robotic kidney transplantation and bariatric surgery for morbidly obese patients with end-stage renal failure [abstract]. American Journal of Transplantation 2019;19:331-2. [EMBASE: 628454944] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Lambert K, Beer J, Dumont R, Hewitt K, Manley K, Meade A, et al. Weight management strategies for those with chronic kidney disease - a consensus report from the Asia Pacific Society of Nephrology and Australia and New Zealand Society of Nephrology 2016 renal dietitians meeting. Nephrology 2017;23(10):912-20. [MEDLINE: ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Higgins JP, Vist GE, Glasziou P, Guyatt GH. Chapter 11: Presenting results and 'Summary of findings' tables. In: Higgins JP, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  49. Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Higgins JP, Deeks JJ, Glasziou P, Guyatt GH. Chapter 12: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions. In: Higgins JP, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  50. Stenvinkel P, Lindholm B. Resolved: being fat is good for dialysis patients. The godzilla effect: con. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2008;19(6):102-4. [MEDLINE: ] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conley, M. M., McFarlane, C. M., Johnson, D. W., Kelly, J. T., Campbell, K. L., & MacLaughlin, H. L.
Affiliations
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • Sunshine Coast University Hospital (AU)
  • Princess Alexandra Hospital (AU)
  • Griffith University (AU)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-03-30
Volume
2021
Issue
3
Pages
CD013119-CD013119
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W2889935138
Cited by
49
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
weight loss interventions, chronic kidney disease, obesity, overweight, end-stage renal disease, dialysis, kidney transplantation, bariatric surgery, dietary intervention, bariatric surgery safety, weight loss, cardiovascular events, mortality, nutritional status, cost-effectiveness, risk of bias, patient-centered outcomes, adverse events, kidney failure progression, quality of life
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Pressure, Energy Intake, Cause of Death, Cholesterol, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Obesity, Proteinuria, Quality of Life, Weight Loss, Bias, Body Mass Index, Confidence Intervals, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Overweight, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Waist Circumference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review