Cited by 282Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsEvaluation and Performance AssessmentHealth Policy Implementation Science

Cochrane Methods 2016

Hannes, Karin·2016

Abstract

I propose that we should not allow the dominant systematic review (SR) paradigm to over-shadow other areas of research that seek to conduct systematic reviews, and that complex social interventions could inform the Cochrane approach to reviews. It is worth evaluatingwhether our current thinking about ‘being systematic’ aligns appropriately with the etymological meaning of the concept.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd201601

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hannes, K.
Corresponding author
Hannes, Karin
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-10-23
OpenAlex
W2562159002
Cited by
278
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 1
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lirias (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
systematic reviews, evidence synthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review