Cited by 36Cancer survivorship and careTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

The influence of telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation interventions on disability: a systematic review

Open access
Brick, Rachelle, Padgett, Lynne, Jones, Jennifer, Wood, Kelley Covington, Pergolotti, Mackenzi, Marshall, Timothy F., Campbell, Grace, Eilers, Rachel +12 more·2023·Journal of Cancer Survivorship

Abstract

Purpose To characterize delivery features and explore effectiveness of telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation interventions that address disability in adult cancer survivors.Methods A systematic review of electronic databases (CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Library: Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, National Health Service's Health Technology Assessment, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) was conducted in December 2019 and updated in April 2021.Results Searches identified 3,499 unique studies. Sixty-eight studies met inclusion criteria. There were 81 unique interventions across included studies. Interventions were primarily delivered post-treatment and lasted an average of 16.5 weeks (SD = 13.1). They were most frequently delivered using telephone calls (59%), administered delivered by nursing professionals (35%), and delivered in a one-on-one format (88%). Risk of bias of included studies was primarily moderate to high. Included studies captured 55 measures of disability. Only 54% of reported outcomes had data that allowed calculation of effect sizes ranging -3.58 to 15.66.Conclusions The analyses suggest small effects of telehealth-based cancer interventions on disability, though the heterogeneity seen in the measurement of disability makes it hard to draw firm conclusions. Further research using more diverse samples, common measures of disability, and pragmatic study designs is needed to advance telehealth in cancer rehabilitation.Implications for cancer survivors Telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation interventions have the potential to increase access to care designed to reduce disability across the cancer care continuum.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11764-022-01181-4

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Systematic reviews have consistently shown that virtual care and remote symptom monitoring can improve access, patient satisfaction, symptom management, and continuity of care, particularly for rural and underserved populations.

    “Systematic reviews have consistently shown that virtual care and remote symptom monitoring can improve access, patient satisfaction, symptom management, and continuity of care, particularly for rural and underserved populations”

    From A Scoping Review of Implemented Innovations in Cancer Care: Implications for Pan-Canadian Scaling (2026) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation may help overcome barriers to access, and the Results report reduced fatigue interference in pooled studies. But the review does not establish improved patient satisfaction or continuity of care; its Discussion says evidence for socially marginalized groups is limited. Its findings therefore do not substantiate the claim's particular emphasis on rural and underserved populations. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The findings of this review are consistent with emerging international evidence that successful cancer care transformation increasingly relies on digital health, workforce innovation, team-based care, and community-oriented models of service delivery.

    “The findings of this review are consistent with emerging international evidence demonstrating that successful cancer care transformation increasingly relies on digital health, workforce innovation, team-based care, and community-oriented models of service delivery”

    From A Scoping Review of Implemented Innovations in Cancer Care: Implications for Pan-Canadian Scaling (2026) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Introduction and Conclusion support telehealth as a promising way to improve access to cancer rehabilitation and reduce disability, but call for further evaluation. The Results (Intervention delivery features) describe some multidisciplinary interventions; they do not establish that successful cancer care transformation increasingly relies on workforce innovation, team-based care, or community-oriented service models. The broader claim of demonstrated reliance overstates this review’s findings. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brick, R., Padgett, L., Jones, J., Wood, K. C., Pergolotti, M., Marshall, T. F., Campbell, G., Eilers, R., Keshavarzi, S., Flores, A. M., Silver, J. K., Virani, A., Livinski, A. A., Ahmed, M. F., Kendig, T., Khalid, B., Barnett, J., Borhani, A., Bernard, G., & Lyons, K. D.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • Duquesne University (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Northside Hospital (US)
  • George Washington University (US)
  • MGH Institute of Health Professions (US)
Corresponding author
Brick, Rachelle
Venue
Journal of Cancer Survivorship
Published
2022-02-26
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
1725-1750
ISSN
  • 1932-2259 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-2267
OpenAlex
W4214509909
Cited by
36
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 4
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cancer Survivorship (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (3UM1CA233035-01S1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
telemedicine, cancer rehabilitation, disability, cancer survivors, telephone-delivered intervention, disability assessment, health care access, cancer care continuum
MeSH terms
Cancer Survivors, Adult, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Neoplasms, State Medicine, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review