Cited by 521Ethics in Clinical ResearchStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 184 of the 185 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials

Open access

Treweek, Shaun, Pitkethly, Marie, Cook, Jonathan, Fraser, Cynthia, Mitchell, Elizabeth, Sullivan, Frank, Jackson, Catherine, Taskila, Tyna K, Gardner, Heidi·2018·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

DOI 10.1002/14651858.mr000013.pub6PMC PMC7078793

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recruiting participants to trials can be extremely difficult. Identifying strategies that improve trial recruitment would benefit both trialists and health research. OBJECTIVES: To quantify the effects of strategies for improving recruitment of participants to randomised trials. A secondary objective is to assess the evidence for the effect of the research setting (e.g. primary care versus secondary care) on recruitment. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Methodology Review Group Specialised Register (CMR) in the Cochrane Library (July 2012, searched 11 February 2015); MEDLINE and MEDLINE In Process (OVID) (1946 to 10 February 2015); Embase (OVID) (1996 to 2015 Week 06); Science Citation Index & Social Science Citation Index (ISI) (2009 to 11 February 2015) and ERIC (EBSCO) (2009 to 11 February 2015). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of methods to increase recruitment to randomised trials. This includes non-healthcare studies and studies recruiting to hypothetical trials. We excluded studies aiming to increase response rates to questionnaires or trial retention and those evaluating incentives and disincentives for clinicians to recruit participants. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We extracted data on: the method evaluated; country in which the study was carried out; nature of the population; nature of the study setting; nature of the study to be recruited into; randomisation or quasi-randomisation method; and numbers and proportions in each intervention group. We used a risk difference to estimate the absolute improvement and the 95% confidence interval (CI) to describe the effect in individual trials. We assessed heterogeneity between trial results. We used GRADE to judge the certainty we had in the evidence coming from each comparison. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 68 eligible trials (24 new to this update) with more than 74,000 participants. There were 63 studies involving interventions aimed directly at trial participants, while five evaluated interventions aimed at people recruiting participants. All studies were in health care.We found 72 comparisons, but just three are supported by high-certainty evidence according to GRADE.1. Open trials rather than blinded, placebo trials. The absolute improvement was 10% (95% CI 7% to 13%).2. Telephone reminders to people who do not respond to a postal invitation. The absolute improvement was 6% (95% CI 3% to 9%). This result applies to trials that have low underlying recruitment. We are less certain for trials that start out with moderately good recruitment (i.e. over 10%).3. Using a particular, bespoke, user-testing approach to develop participant information leaflets. This method involved spending a lot of time working with the target population for recruitment to decide on the content, format and appearance of the participant information leaflet. This made little or no difference to recruitment: absolute improvement was 1% (95% CI -1% to 3%).We had moderate-certainty evidence for eight other comparisons; our confidence was reduced for most of these because the results came from a single study. Three of the methods were changes to trial management, three were changes to how potential participants received information, one was aimed at recruiters, and the last was a test of financial incentives. All of these comparisons would benefit from other researchers replicating the evaluation. There were no evaluations in paediatric trials.We had much less confidence in the other 61 comparisons because the studies had design flaws, were single studies, had very uncertain results or were hypothetical (mock) trials rather than real ones. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The literature on interventions to improve recruitment to trials has plenty of variety but little depth. Only 3 of 72 comparisons are supported by high-certainty evidence according to GRADE: having an open trial and using telephone reminders to non-responders to postal interventions both increase recruitment; a specialised way of developing participant information leaflets had little or no effect. The methodology research community should improve the evidence base by replicating evaluations of existing strategies, rather than developing and testing new ones.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.mr000013.pub6

Cites

184 of 184 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad · Cited by 23,305
Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires
Edwards, P. J., Roberts, I., Clarke, M. J., DiGuiseppi, C., Wentz, R., Kwan, I., Cooper, R., Felix, L. M., & Pratap, S. (2009) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.mr000008.pub4 · Cited by 1,379
What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies
McDonald, A. M., Knight, R. C., Campbell, M. K., Entwistle, V. A., Grant, A. M., Cook, J. A., Elbourne, D. R., Francis, D., Garcia, J., Roberts, I., et al. (2006) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-7-9 · Cited by 946
Self-citation
Methods to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis
Treweek, S. P., Lockhart, P., Pitkethly, M., Cook, J. A., Kjeldstrøm, M., Johansen, M., Taskila, T. K., Sullivan, F., Wilson, S., Jackson, C. M., et al. (2013) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002360 · Cited by 625
Self-citation
Recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a review of trials funded and published by the United Kingdom Health Technology Assessment Programme
Walters, S. J., Bonacho dos Anjos Henriques-Cadby, I., Bortolami, O., Flight, L., Hind, D., Jacques, R. M., Knox, C., Nadin, B., Rothwell, J., Surtees, M., et al. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015276 · Cited by 560
A reinvestigation of recruitment to randomised, controlled, multicenter trials: a review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies
Sully, B. G. O., Julious, S. A., & Nicholl, J. (2013) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-14-166 · Cited by 410
Factors that limit the quality, number and progress of randomised controlled trials
Prescott, Counsell, Gillespie, Grant, Russell, Kiauka, Colthart, Ross, Shepherd, & Russell (1999) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta3200 · Cited by 390
Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials
Treweek, S., Mitchell, E., Pitkethly, M., Cook, J., Kjeldstrøm, M., Johansen, M., Taskila, T. K., Sullivan, F., Wilson, S., Jackson, C., et al. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.mr000013.pub5 · Cited by 378
Self-citation
Increasing recruitment to randomised trials: a review of randomised controlled trials
Watson, J. M., & Torgerson, D. J. (2006) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-34 · Cited by 333

Show all 185 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

Jennings, 2015, Does offering an incentive payment improve recruitment to clinical trials and increase the proportion of socially deprived and elderly participants?, Trials, 16, 80, 10.1186/s13063-015-0582-8 · DOI
Jennings, 2015, Does offering an incentive payment improve recruitment to clinical trials and increase the proportion of socially deprived and elderly participants?, Trials, 16, 80, 10.1186/s13063-015-0582-8 · DOI
Jennings, 2015, Does offering an incentive payment improve recruitment to clinical trials and increase the proportion of socially deprived and elderly participants?, Trials, 16, 80, 10.1186/s13063-015-0582-8 · DOI
Jennings, 2015, Does offering an incentive payment improve recruitment to clinical trials and increase the proportion of socially deprived and elderly participants?, Trials, 16, 80, 10.1186/s13063-015-0582-8 · DOI
Man, 2015, Improving recruitment to a study of telehealth management for long-term conditions in primary care: two embedded, randomised controlled trials of optimised patient information materials, Trials, 16, 309, 10.1186/s13063-015-0820-0 · DOI
Perrone, 1995, Looking for consent in RCTs: a randomised trial with surrogate patients, Epidemiologia e Prevenzione, 19, 282
Brocklehurst P Tarnow-Mordi W Farrell B Quigley M INLET trial - cluster trial of newsletters and educational supplements to centres participating in INIS trial Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit; 2007. Annual Report 2006
Calimlim, 1977, Selection, attrition, and consent in recruitment of patients for a clinical trial, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 21, 100
Donovan, 2010, Development and application of a complex intervention to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials, Clinical Trials, 7, 469
Eckardt, 2011, Impact of direct physician-to-physician contact on accelerating oncology clinical trials accrual, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29
Feman, 2008, Effectiveness of recruitment in clinical trials: an analysis of methods used in a trial for irritable bowel syndrome patients, Contemporary Clinical Trials, 29, 241, 10.1016/j.cct.2007.08.004 · DOI
Gillan, 2009, Increasing participant recruitment into large-scale screening trials: experience from the CADET II study, Journal of Medical Screening, 16, 180, 10.1258/jms.2009.009023 · DOI
Menoyo E Perez M de la Torre R Farré M Telephone screening to improve recruitment of healthy volunteers in neuropsychopharmacology clinical trials: role of nurses Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the Spanish Clinical Pharmacology Society 2006
Monane, 1991, The randomized controlled trial in the long-term care setting - recruitment and enrollment, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 39, A51
Porucznik, 2010, Participant recruitment in a virtually interconnected world: comparative effectiveness and considerations of bias, American Journal of Epidemiology, 171, s147
Quinaux, 2003, Impact of monitoring visits on patient recruitment and data quality: case study of a phase IV trial in oncology, Controlled Clinical Trials, 24, 99S
Saul, 2002, Influences on recruitment in clinical trials, European Journal of Cancer, 38, 2334
Greenlee, 2003, Recruitment feasibility for a pilot randomized controlled trial on the effect of naturopathic therapies on estrogen metabolism, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, 12, 1302s

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 514

Review of research ethics guidelines on payment of healthy volunteers
Hasler, N., Henning, T., & Suleman, M. (2025) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme-2024-110509 · Cited by 3
Who presents the greatest challenge in intellectual disability research- participants or health and research professionals?
Kelly, R. H., Taggart, L., COATES, V. E., Truesdale, M., Dunkley, A. J., Hadjiconstantinou, M., Khunti, K. K., & Mills, N. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0332744 · Cited by 3
Real-World Testing of an Artificial Intelligence Conversational Agent as an Early Intervention and Support Tool in the Mental Health Referral Care Pathway: A Mixed-Methods Study
Meinert, E., Milne‐Ives, M., Taylor, E., Inkster, B., Paik, A., Ananthakrishnan, A., Orr, M., Costelloe, C., & Shankar, R. (2026) · International Journal of Social Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/00207640251415507 · Cited by 3
Attitudes Toward Providing Open Access for Use of Biospecimens and Health Records: A Cross-Sectional Study from Jordan
Al-Shami, K. M., Ahmed, W. S., & Alzoubi, K. H. (2023) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s402769 · Cited by 3
Co-production of guidance and resources to implement principled participant information leaflets (PrinciPILs)
Jacob, N., Howick, J., Svobodová, M., Treweek, S. P., Gillies, K., Edwards, A., Bower, P., Bostock, J., & Hood, K. (2023) · NIHR Open Research · doi:10.3310/nihropenres.13423.1 · Cited by 3
Self-citation
Factors influencing willingness to participate in ophthalmic clinical trials and strategies for effective recruitment
Liang, J.-E., Zhang, E., Peng, Y.-Y., Chen, L., Deng, J.-Y., Lin, T., Fu, J., Zhang, J., Li, S., Li, F., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.18240/ijo.2024.01.21 · Cited by 3
Are Diabetes Prevention Programs Reaching Those Most at Risk? A Scoping Review
Johnston, C., MacPherson, M., & Jung, M. E. (2024) · Canadian Journal of Diabetes · doi:10.1016/j.jcjd.2024.11.006 · Cited by 4
A feasibility study of the internet-based intervention “Strategies for Empowering activities in Everyday life” (SEE 1.0) applied for people with stroke
Larsson-Lund, M., Barchéus, I.-M., Ranner, M., Vikman, I., Jacobsson, L., & Lexell, E. M. (2025) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-025-12456-8 · Cited by 3
A scoping review of how behavioural theories, models and frameworks have been applied to the design, conduct, analysis or reporting of clinical trials
Coffey, T., Young, N., & Gillies, K. (2025) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-025-08808-8 · Cited by 3
A series of randomized trials of behavioral economic interventions to increase racial and ethnic diversity of research participants:Rationale and design of ITERATE.
Patel, N., Whitman, C., Lieberman, A., Blady, S., Morse, C., Naseer, N., Weaver, J., Ogunniyi, M. O., Kohn, R., Volpp, K., et al. (2025) · American Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2025.03.016 · Cited by 2
The Acute VertEbRal AugmentaTion (AVERT) study: protocol for a randomised controlled, feasibility trial of spinal medial branch nerve block in hospitalised older patients with vertebral fragility fractures
Tan, C. W., Cameron, M., Arlachov, Y., Bastounis, A., Bishop, S., Czernicki, M., Drummond, A. E., Fakis, A., Pasku, D., & Sahota, O. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059194 · Cited by 3
Online randomised trials with children: A scoping review protocol
Lepage, S., Conway, A., Goodson, N., Wicks, P. J., & Devane, D. (2022) · HRB Open Research · doi:10.12688/hrbopenres.13566.1 · Cited by 3
Understanding potential participation barriers to improve trial design and outcomes: clinical trial simulation in palmoplantar pustulosis as a case study
Boisvert-Huneault, C., Trigos, D., Pinter, A., Kobayashi, S., Bell, S. J., Kallsen, K., Gloede, T., Yagi, N., Brunette, S., Datsenko, Y., et al. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064159 · Cited by 3
Incorporating usability evaluation into iterative development of an online platform to support research participation in Parkinson’s disease: a mixed methods protocol
Chapman, R., Zeissler, M., Meinert, E., Mullin, S., Whipps, S., Whipps, J., Hockey, K., Hockey, P., & Carroll, C. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078638 · Cited by 3
The effectiveness and acceptability of multimedia information when recruiting children and young people to trials: the TRECA meta-analysis of SWATs
Knapp, P., Martin‐Kerry, J., Moe‐Byrne, T., Sheridan, R., Coleman, E., Roche, J., Young, B., Higgins, S., Preston, J., Bower, P., et al. (2023) · Health and Social Care Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/htpm3841 · Cited by 6
An Overview of Artificial Intelligence (AI) In Drug Delivery and Development
Mutha, R. E., Bagul, V. S., Tade, R. S., & Vinchurkar, K. (2024) · BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBLISHERS eBooks · doi:10.2174/9789815305753124010004 · Cited by 3
Patient and parent perspectives on being invited to join a trial of night-time only versus full-time bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Sherratt, F. C., Swaby, L., Walker, K. L., Jayasuriya, R. L., Campbell, L., Mills, A. J., Gardner, A. C., Perry, D. C., Cole, A., & Young, B. (2025) · Bone & Joint Open · doi:10.1302/2633-1462.62.bjo-2024-0078.r1 · Cited by 3
A telephone reminder to enhance adherence to interventions in cardiovascular randomized trials: A protocol for a study within a trial (SWAT)
Bensaaud, A., Gibson, I., Jones, J. L., Flaherty, G. T., Sultan, S., Tawfick, W. A., & Jordan, F. (2020) · Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine · doi:10.1111/jebm.12375 · Cited by 3
Contextual interference in children with brain lesions: a pilot study investigating blocked vs. random practice order of an upper limb robotic exergame
Graser, J. V., Bastiaenen, C. H. G., Gut, A., Keller, U., & van Hedel, H. J. A. (2021) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-021-00866-4 · Cited by 3
Supporting GPs and people with hypertension to maximise medication use to control blood pressure: Protocol for a pilot cluster RCT of the MIAMI intervention
Morrissey, E. C., Murphy, A. W., Murphy, P. J., O'Grady, L., Byrne, M., Casey, M., Dolan, E., Duane, S., Durand, H., Gillespie, P., et al. (2023) · HRB Open Research · doi:10.12688/hrbopenres.13661.1 · Cited by 3
Feasibility Randomised Control Trial of OptiMal: A Self-Management Intervention for Cancer Survivors
Boland, L., Bennett, K., Cuffe, S. D., Grant, C. M., Kennedy, M., & Connolly, D. (2023) · Current Oncology · doi:10.3390/curroncol30120742 · Cited by 3
Recruitment Barriers of an mHealth Pediatric Asthma Pilot Study
Wyatt, T. H., Li, X., Fancher, S., Mitoubsi, A. S., & pardue, J. P. (2023) · Western Journal of Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/01939459231217919 · Cited by 3
Sun Safe Partners: A pilot and feasibility trial of a couple-focused intervention to improve sun protection practices
Manne, S. L., Day, A. K., Coups, E. J., & Kashy, D. A. (2018) · Preventive Medicine Reports · doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.010 · Cited by 3
The OMACS-PIL study: a randomised controlled trial within the OMACS observational study
Culliford, L. A., Brierley, R. C. M., Clout, M., Evans, R., Maishman, R., Phillips, D., Tabusa, H., Reeves, B. C., & Rogers, C. A. (2019) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-019-3958-3 · Cited by 3
Educational Intervention for Family Nursing Students in Long-Term Cancer Survivorship: A Randomized Pilot Trial
Domingo‐Osle, M., Rosa‐Salas, V. L., & García‐Vivar, C. (2023) · Journal of Family Nursing · doi:10.1177/10748407231167438 · Cited by 3
Clinical Trials in ALS – Current Challenges and Strategies for Future Directions
Salmon, K., & Genge, A. L. (2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119745532.ch9 · Cited by 3
Disease‑Modifying Trials in Parkinson’s Disease: Challenges, Lessons, and Future DirectionsPreprint
Rissardo, J. P., & Caprara, A. L. F. (2025) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202512.1091.v1 · Cited by 3
Impact of caregivers' psychological and caregiving status on recruitment, conversion, and retention in stem cell therapy trials for cerebral palsy: A prospective survey analysis
Huang, X., Qin, X., Li, M., Li, Y., Shen, L., Jin, G. H., Wang, Y., Liu, J., & Li, X. (2023) · Nursing Open · doi:10.1002/nop2.1767 · Cited by 2
The development and acceptability of an educational and training intervention for recruiters to neonatal trials: the TRAIN project
Smith, V. A., Delaney, H., Hunter, A., Torgerson, D. J., Treweek, S. P., Gamble, C. L., Mills, N., Stanbury, K., Dempsey, E. M., Daly, M. B., et al. (2023) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-023-02086-1 · Cited by 2
Self-citation
Addressing Statistical Power and Increasing Diversity in Hospice Research: Electronic Medical Record Participant Identification Compared to Nurse Referral Approaches to Recruitment
Oliver, D. P., Ersek, M. T., White, P., Jorgenson, L., Pitzer, K., Rolbiecki, A. J., Mayahara, M. P., Washington, K. T., & Demiris, G. (2024) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.08.005 · Cited by 2
Review article: A primer for clinical researchers in the emergency department: Part XIII . Strategies to engage staff and enhance participant recruitment in emergency department research
O’Brien, S., Wilson, C. L., Duck, M., Nieva, G., Rao, M. P., & Haskell, L. (2024) · Emergency Medicine Australasia · doi:10.1111/1742-6723.14505 · Cited by 2
Research assistants’ experiences recruiting patients with psychosis into clinical trials: a qualitative study
Beckley, A., Głogowska, M., Waite, F., Bee, P., & Freeman, D. H. (2025) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-025-08882-y · Cited by 2
Patient Reflections on Participation in a Randomised Controlled Multimodal Prehabilitation Trial Before Ventral Hernia Repair
Jensen, S. A.-M. S., Fonnes, S., Rosenberg, J., Tønnesen, H., & Lauridsen, S. V. (2025) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph22071039 · Cited by 2
The ethical permissibility of financial incentives
Al, P., Brehaut, J., Gillies, K., Presseau, J., Yee, M.-L., & Weijer, C. (2026) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-025-10315-1 · Cited by 2
ATTITUDE - Addressing attrition in longitudinal cancer cohorts: an in-depth qualitative analysis of experiences and perspectives on participation in longitudinal studies among breast cancer survivors
Martin, É., Chichua, M., Chiodi, C. K., Zyumbileva, P., Lapidari, P., Pagliuca, M., Gillanders, E., Barbier, A., Bertaut, A., Boinon, D., et al. (2026) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-026-07904-w · Cited by 2
Policy-aligned Research Trajectories in AI-Enabled Clinical Trials: A 2015–2025 Bibliometric Synthesis and Governance Implications for Korea and the UK
Yang, J. E., & Kim, A. R. (2026) · The Open Public Health Journal · doi:10.2174/0118749445454045260120075224 · Cited by 2
Messaging Modality and Content for Recruitment of Research Participants
Gouda, P., Glover, L. M., Kenjale, A. A., Chiswell, K., Erickson, T., Goldstein, B. A., Kelsey, M. D., Roberts, J., Peterson, E. D., Patel, M. I. A. A., et al. (2026) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.14046 · Cited by 2
Getting them through the door: Social and behavioral determinants of uptake and engagement in an obesity intervention
Rodriguez, A., Korzeniowska, K., Szarejko, K., Borowski, H., Brzeziński, M., Myśliwiec, M., Czupryniak, L., Berggren, P., Radziwiłł, M., & Soszynski, P. A. (2022) · Obesity Research & Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.orcp.2022.11.002 · Cited by 2
Recruitment and retention interventions in surgical and wound care trials: A systematic review
Arundel, C., & Mott, A. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0288028 · Cited by 2
Application of behavioral economic strategies to enhance recruitment into a pediatric randomized clinical trial for postoperative pain relief: A randomized clinical trial
Karthic, A., Orgil, Z., Tram, N. K., Rice‐Weimer, J., Stevens, J. H., & Olbrecht, V. A. (2023) · Pediatric Anesthesia · doi:10.1111/pan.14755 · Cited by 2
Social marketing and the challenges of participant recruitment
Baranowski, T., O’Connor, T. M., Jimenez-Garcia, J. A., Radhakrishnan, K., Arredondo, E. M., & Thompson, D. I. (2024) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/tbm/ibae028 · Cited by 2
Recruitment and Retention of Social Workers as Research Participants: Lessons from a Randomized Controlled Trial
Keemink, J. R., Stander, W. J., Montgomery, P., & Schaub, J. (2025) · Social Work Research · doi:10.1093/swr/svaf002 · Cited by 2
Harnessing health plan enrollee data to boost membership in patient-powered research networks
Chen, X., Agiro, A., Nowell, W. B., Loud, S., McBurney, R. N., Young, K., Sutphen, R., Clark, E. B., Burroughs, C., Curtis, J. R., et al. (2020) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-020-05325-z · Cited by 2
A preliminary randomized trial of reinforcement contingencies to improve compliance with ecological momentary assessment
Gass, J. C., Tonkin, S., Maguin, E., Colder, C. R., Mahoney, M. C., Tiffany, S. T., & Hawk, L. W. (2023) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/tbm/ibad066 · Cited by 2
Access to therapy for child sexual abuse survivors: Preliminary dialogue of barriers and facilitators between caregivers
Jin, J., Al-Shamali, H. F., Smith‐MacDonald, L., Reeson, M., Polzin, W., Wei, Y., Pazderka, H., Silverstone, P. H., & Greenshaw, A. J. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0294686 · Cited by 3
Evaluation of Eligibility Criteria Relevance for the Purpose of IT-Supported Trial Recruitment: Descriptive Quantitative Analysis
Blasini, R., Strantz, C., Gülden, C., Helfer, S., Lidke, J., Prokosch, H., Sohrabi, K., & Schneider, H. (2023) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/49347 · Cited by 2
A randomized comparison of recruitment messages for a weight loss clinical trial targeting men working in trade and labor occupations
Crane, M. M., & Appelhans, B. M. (2024) · Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications · doi:10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101289 · Cited by 2
Development and validation of a new tool to assess quality of decision-making by older children and parents about research participation.
Moe-Byrne, T., Knapp, P., Coleman, E., Martin-Kerry, J., Sheridan, R., & Graffy, J. (2024) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2024.108417 · Cited by 2
Participant Motivators and Expectations in the MEL-SELF Randomized Clinical Trial of Patient-Led Surveillance for Recurrent Melanoma: Content Analysis of Survey Responses
Ackermann, D. M., Hersch, J. K., Jordan, D., Clinton-Gray, E., Bracken, K., Janda, M., Turner, R. M., & Bell, K. (2024) · JMIR Dermatology · doi:10.2196/58136 · Cited by 2
Barriers and enablers to recruiting participants within paediatric perioperative and anaesthetic settings: lessons learned from a trial of melatonin versus midazolam in the premedication of anxious children (the MAGIC trial)
Hyslop, M. C., Papaioannou, D. E., BOLT, R. J., Wilson, M., Bradburn, M. J., Clarkson, J., Herbert, E., Ireland, N., Kettle, J., Loban, A., et al. (2025) · BJA Open · doi:10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100375 · Cited by 2
Mindfulness-based (non-contact) boxing therapy (MBBT) for depression and anxiety: A feasibility study
Bozdarov, J., Jones, B. D. M., Umer, M., Blumberger, D. M., & Husain, M. I. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0318364 · Cited by 3
Exploring resistance and avoidance behaviours at the research delivery, clinical practice interface: group concept mapping through a critical realist lens
Tinkler, L., Robertson, S., & Tod, A. (2025) · Journal of research in nursing · doi:10.1177/17449871241311536 · Cited by 2
Recruitment and Retention for an Acupuncture Trial in an Underrepresented 65 and Older Population With Chronic Low Back Pain
Teets, R., Nielsen, A., Mah, D. M., Beyrouty, M., Handel, M. J., Justice, M., Jyung, H., Eng, C. M., & DeBar, L. (2025) · Global Advances in Integrative Medicine and Health · doi:10.1177/27536130251340921 · Cited by 2
Influence of providing information to participants about development of trial outcomes on response rates and attitudes to questionnaire completion: Protocol for a study within a trial
Griffin, C., Toomey, E. C., Queally, M., Hayes, C. B., Kearney, P. M., & Matvienko‐Sikar, K. (2019) · HRB Open Research · doi:10.12688/hrbopenres.12895.2 · Cited by 2
A randomised trial of the effects on recruitment and retention of including a wet-ink signature and photograph in the patient invitation letter for a clinical trial: results from a Study Within a Trial (SWAT 3 and SWAT 53)
Anand, R., Bradley, J. M., O'Neill, B. M., McAuley, D. F., & Clarke, M. J. (2022) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.75339.1 · Cited by 2
Early experience with an opt-in research register - Scottish Health Research Register (SHARE): a multi-method evaluation of participant recruitment performance
Shi, W., Vasishta, S., Dow, L., Cavellini, D., Palmer, C., McKinstry, B., & Sullivan, F. (2021) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-021-01479-4 · Cited by 2
Self-citation
Predator-prey collapses at the edge of predator distribution: the case of clupeids and common guillemots (Uria aalge) in NW Iberia
Martínez‐Abraín, A., Tomillo, P. S., Mouriño, J., Rodríguez-Silvar, J., & Bermejo, A. (2023) · Scientia Marina · doi:10.3989/scimar.05299.053 · Cited by 2
Protocol for a factorial randomised controlled trial, embedded within WHiTE 8 COPAL, of an Enhanced Trainee Principal Investigator Package and Additional Digital Nudge to increase recruitment rates
Agni, N., Fairhurst, C. M., McDaid, C., Reed, M. R., & Torgerson, D. J. (2019) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.19743.1 · Cited by 2
EHR phenotyping for research recruitment: Researcher, IRB, and physician perspectives on approaches to contacting patients
Beskow, L. M., Brelsford, K. M., & Hammack‐Aviran, C. M. (2020) · Journal of Clinical and Translational Science · doi:10.1017/cts.2020.524 · Cited by 2
Using Patient-Generated Health Data From Twitter to Identify, Engage, and Recruit Cancer Survivors in Clinical Trials in Los Angeles County: Evaluation of a Feasibility Study
Reuter, K., Angyan, P., Le, N., & Buchanan, T. A. (2021) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/29958 · Cited by 2
Trainee Principal Investigator Could Improve Recruitment in Trauma Trials: Review of Literature and Experience From a Trauma Center
Vas, A., D’sa, P., Gokhale, S., Agarwal, T., Roberts, G. L., & Mohanty, K. (2021) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.18920 · Cited by 2
Online randomised trials with children: A scoping review protocolPreprint
Lepage, S., Conway, A., Goodson, N., Wicks, P. J., & Devane, D. (2022) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2022.04.15.22273742 · Cited by 2
Using a 3 stage process to create a consumer research contact list in a paediatric health setting: the PARTICIPATE project
Gill, F. J., Pienaar, C. A., & Jones, T. (2021) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-021-00300-2 · Cited by 1
Development of a primary care research network focused on chronic disease: a feasibility study for both practices and research networks
O'Connor, R., Murphy, P. J., O’Callaghan, M. E., Smith, S. M., Glynn, L. G., Collins, C., O’Driscoll, R., & Murphy, A. W. (2021) · HRB Open Research · doi:10.12688/hrbopenres.13311.1 · Cited by 1
Review of the recruitment process for a large investigator-initiated trial in early Parkinson’s disease
Verschuur, C. V. M., Donovan, J., & de Bie, R. M. A. (2022) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-022-06052-y · Cited by 1
Human-Centered Design: A Possible Solution to Rural Clinical Trial Enrollment
Swenson, W. T., Westergard, E., Schroeder, Z., & Swenson, A. G. (2023) · Oncology Issues · doi:10.3928/25731777-20230920-07 · Cited by 1
Qualitative study of challenges with recruitment of hospitals into a cluster controlled trial of clinical decision support in Australia
Baysari, M. T., Dort, B. A. V., Stanceski, K., Hargreaves, A., Zheng, W. Y., Moran, M., Day, R. O., Li, L., Westbrook, J. I., & Hilmer, S. N. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080610 · Cited by 1
Participant recruitment and retention in randomised controlled trials of melanoma surveillance: A scoping review
Ackermann, D. M., Bracken, K., Hersch, J. K., Janda, M., Turner, R. M., & Bell, K. (2025) · Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications · doi:10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101461 · Cited by 1
Opportunities and challenges to delivering a trial for depressive symptoms in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic: insights from the Alpha-Stim-D randomised controlled trial
Patel, S., Patel, P., Boutry, C., Guo, B., Butler, D. A., Higton, F., McNaughton, R., Briley, P. M., Griffiths, C., Nixon, N. L., et al. (2025) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-025-08772-3 · Cited by 1
Frequency, characteristics, and reasons for termination of cerebral palsy clinical trials
Gouzoulis, M. J., Caruana, D. L., Yang, A. A. L., Seddio, A. E., Grauer, J. N., & Frumberg, D. B. (2025) · PM&R · doi:10.1002/pmrj.13398 · Cited by 1
Recruiting patients into a healthcare services trial: lessons learned from a feasibility study to investigate a patient-oriented navigation intervention for age-associated diseases
Gödde, K., Fügemann, H., Grittner, U., Kohl, R., Meisel, A., Reinhold, T., Rieckmann, N., Schnitzer, S., Deckert, P. M., Frost, N., et al. (2025) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-025-13023-x · Cited by 1
Trial Forge Guidance 5: ethical considerations in randomised Studies Within A Trial (SWATs)
Bruhn, H., Treweek, S. P., Weijer, C., Briel, M., Clarke, M. J., Crowley, R. K., Gillies, K., Green, H., Murphy, E. K., Parker, A., et al. (2025) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-025-08958-9 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Developing evidence-based guidelines for describing potential benefits and harms within patient information leaflets/sheets (PILs) that inform and do not cause harm (PrinciPILs)
Howick, J., Svobodová, M., Treweek, S. P., Gillies, K., Edwards, A., Bower, P., Bostock, J., Jacob, N., & Hood, K. (2025) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/gjjh2402 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Exploring Diabetes Clinical Trial Participation: A Diverse Group Interview Study
Taira, D. A., Tengan, K., Takata, J., Porter, C., Ranken, M. S., Sentell, T. L., & Seto, T. B. (2025) · Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science · doi:10.1007/s43441-025-00867-y · Cited by 1
Implementation of the Study Participant Feedback Questionnaire to understand participant experience in a phase 3 oncology clinical trial
Nowojewski, A., Wheal, A., Dott, W., Ruscica, D., Ghiorghiu, S., & Valastro, B. (2025) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094596 · Cited by 1
Quantitative evaluation of recruitment strategies in a cluster-randomized trial: segmented regression and cost analysis from the AOK-Family + study
Litke, N. A., Wensing, M., Hermeling, L., & Bombana, M. (2025) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-025-02734-8 · Cited by 1
Patient engagement and shared decision-making in trial recruitment intervention studies: a systematic review
Morgan, T. L., Hudek, N., Carroll, K. A., Yee, M.-L., Inglis, J., Fergusson, D. A., Gillies, K., Richards, D. P., Semchishen, S. N., Presseau, J., et al. (2025) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-025-00806-z · Cited by 1
Good clinical trial funding practices: how can public funders reduce the risk of trial failure and improve health impact?
Hulstaert, F., Harrison, J., Nevens, H., Stocquart, N., Marynen, E., Pouppez, C., Neyt, M., Verleye, L., & Vrijens, F. (2026) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-026-09511-y · Cited by 1
Experiences and perspectives of children and adolescents participating in pediatric clinical trials: a qualitative evidence synthesis
Ren, Y., Tang, S. L. S., Ji, G., Li, R., Liu, J., Xia, R., & Fei, Y. (2026) · Archives of Public Health · doi:10.1186/s13690-026-01904-4 · Cited by 1
Socioeconomic representativeness of Australian, Canadian and British cohorts from the paediatric diabetes AdDIT study: comparisons to regional and national data
Mahmud, F. H., Clarke, A. B. M., Elia, Y. T., Curtis, J., Benitez‐Aguirre, P., Cameron, F. J., Chiesa, S. T., Clarson, C. L., Couper, J., Craig, M. E., et al. (2023) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-023-03222-w · Cited by 2
Einstellung zu Datenschutz und Wahrnehmung von Datensicherheit im Gesundheitsbereich
Haug, S., Raptis, G., & Weber, K. (2024) · Regensburger Beiträge zur Digitalisierung des Gesundheitswesens · doi:10.14361/9783839467282-003 · Cited by 1
A study within a trial (SWAT) of clinical trial feasibility and barriers to recruitment in the United Kingdom – the CapaCiTY programme experience
Stevens, N. J., Taheri, S., Grossi, U., Emmett, C., Bannister, S., Norton, C. S., Yiannakou, Y., Knowles, C. H., & on behalf of the CapaCiTY programme (2024) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-024-02395-z · Cited by 1
Factors Associated With Enrollment to a Decentralized Study
Bharucha, A. E., Bublitz, M. L., Vierkant, R. A., Luehrs, T. C., Konzen, K. A., Weiss, D. A., Hart, T. A., Boos, C. M., Allen, A. M., Bailey, K. R., et al. (2024) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2024.03.022 · Cited by 1
Prevalence of Dropout and Influencing Factors in Digital Psychosocial Intervention Trials for Adult Illicit Substance Users: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Li, J., Liu, X., Du, X., Mi, T., & Ren, Z. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/77853 · Cited by 1
Effect of opt-in versus opt-out framing on trial recruitment: a study within a trial of the GAMEPAD randomized trial
Shah, T., Coratti, S., Farraday, D., Norton, L. A., Rareshide, C. A. L., Zhu, J., Levin, M. G., Park, S.-H., Damrauer, S. M., Giri, J. S., et al. (2025) · American Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2025.107285 · Cited by 1
Theory and behaviour change techniques informing strategies to improve recruitment to clinical trials: a systematic review of randomised evaluations
Hudek, N., Carroll, K. A., Semchishen, S. N., Presseau, J., Gillies, K., Grimshaw, J., Fergusson, D. A., Graham, I. D., Taljaard, M., & Brehaut, J. (2026) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-026-09664-w · Cited by 1
Very Low Uptake in Workplace Semen Analysis Research: Formative Web-Based Cross-Sectional Follow-Up Survey Distinguishing Employees With Self-Reported Unawareness From Aware Nonparticipants
Nakazono, A., Kojo, K., Oguri, T., Nosato, H., Ikeda, A., Kakinuma, T., Nishiyama, H., Takeshita, H., Takayama, T., Yanagida, K., et al. (2026) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/90788 · Cited by 1
Navigating Challenges and Refining Methods for Randomized Controlled Trials Including Young People With Intellectual Disabilities: Empirical and Literature‐Informed Insights
Ågren, K. A., Henriksson, P., Johansson, �., Tyrberg, M. J., Ineland, J., Chadwick, D. D., & Müssener, U. (2026) · Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities · doi:10.1111/jppi.70066 · Cited by 1
Prioritising key motivators and challenges influencing informal carers’ decisions for participating in randomised trials: An embedded Study Within A before and after Trial (SWAT 55)
Smith, V. A., Corry, M., Devane, D., Treweek, S. P., Hunter, A., Grylka‐Baeschlin, S., & Hannon, K. (2020) · HRB Open Research · doi:10.12688/hrbopenres.13125.2 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Establishment of a Nationwide Patient Database for Clinical Trial Recruitment in Dermatology: Concept and Patient Characteristics
Bouazzi, D., Bygum, A., Skov, L., Sachs, M., Iversen, L., Hædersdal, M., Jemec, G. B. E., & Thomsen, S. F. (2021) · Acta Dermato Venereologica · doi:10.2340/00015555-3800 · Cited by 1
Do chiropractic interns use clinical practice guidelines when managing patients with neck pain in France? A feasibility study
Sorondo, D., Delpierre, C., Côté, P., & Lemeunier, N. (2022) · Chiropractic & Manual Therapies · doi:10.1186/s12998-022-00453-1 · Cited by 1
Educational video while “waiting-to-be-seen” in a cardiology outpatient clinic promotes opt-in self-consent for biobanking of remnant clinical biospecimens: A randomized-controlled trial
López, J. E., Kyle, A., Hosseini, A. J., Wilson, M., & Soares, S. (2023) · Journal of Clinical and Translational Science · doi:10.1017/cts.2023.518 · Cited by 1
Quality reporting of randomized controlled trials on SGLT2 inhibitors for heart failure: a comprehensive assessment
Yang, Y., Yang, S., Han, Y., Zou, G., Wang, R., & Liu, L. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-57514-z · Cited by 1
The Impact of the G6PD Gene Mutations in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Infection Treated with Direct-Acting Antivirals: A Multicenter Observational Study
Smirne, C., Crobu, M. G., Gerevini, C., Berton, A. M., Rapetti, R., Pasini, B., Ravanini, P., & Pirisi, M. (2024) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes15091116 · Cited by 1
Electronic Monitoring of Mom’s Schedule (eMOMS™): A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial Targeting Postpartum Weight Retention and Breastfeeding Duration Among Populations With Overweight/Obesity
Jacobson, L. T., Befort, C. A., Okut, H., Zackula, R., Dowling, J., Stern, J. E., Robbins, D. C., Wolfe, M. D., Kluding, P. M., & Grainger, D. A. (2024) · Journal of Human Lactation · doi:10.1177/08903344241297604 · Cited by 1
Advancing trial recruitment science through enhanced study design
Lewicki, P., & Stensland, K. D. (2025) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.35703 · Cited by 1
Variation in the extent to which patient information leaflets describe potential benefits and harms of trial interventions: a commentary
Howick, J., Lantos, J. D., Treweek, S. P., Svobodová, M., Jacob, N., Edwards, A., Bostock, J., Bower, P., Gillies, K., & Hood, K. (2025) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-025-08824-8 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
What is the impact on recruitment of a shortened compared with a standard-length participant information leaflet? PROMETHEUS in IBD-BOOST: study within a trial, a decentralised UK randomised controlled trial
Miller, L., Hart, A. L., Büttner, F., Arundel, C., Hamborg, T., McGuinness, S., Moss-Morris, R. E., Parker, A., Relton, C., Stagg, I., et al. (2025) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-025-08931-6 · Cited by 1
Trials Within Trials—Optimizing the Delivery of RCTs
Ong, S. W. X., Daneman, N., & Tong, S. Y. C. (2025) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2025.10107 · Cited by 1
Surgical wounds healing by Secondary Intention-2 Trial: outcomes and learning from the internal pilot phase and main trial
Arundel, C., Zahra, S., Chetter, I. C., on behalf of the SWHSI-2 Trial Investigators, Baird, K., Martin, B. C., Hewitt, C., Fairhurst, C., Gkekas, A., Mott, A., et al. (2025) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-025-01658-w · Cited by 1

Authors: Treweek, S., Pitkethly, M., Cook, J., Fraser, C., Mitchell, E., Sullivan, F., Jackson, C., Taskila, T. K., & Gardner, H.
Affiliations: University of Aberdeen (GB)
University of Dundee (GB)
Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre (GB)
University of Hull (GB)
University of St Andrews (GB)
University of Lancashire (GB)
The Work Foundation (GB)
ORCID: Treweek, Shaun
Cook, Jonathan
Fraser, Cynthia
Mitchell, Elizabeth
Sullivan, Frank
Jackson, Catherine
Venue: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher: Wiley
Published: 2018-02-22
Volume: 2018
Issue: 2
Pages: MR000013-MR000013
ISSN: 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
1465-1858
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.mr000013.pub6
PMC: PMC7078793
OpenAlex: W2788630491
Cited by: 521
References: 185
Citations by year: 2026: 31 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 9
FWCI: 8.99
Type: journal article
Language: en
Update notices: new_version (2026-09-15)
Open access: bronze
doi.org
Locations: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
CLOK (University of Central Lancashire) (acceptedVersion)
Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion)
St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (submittedVersion)
Funders: National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0514-10114)
Medical Research Council (MR/K025643/1)
Topics: Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords: trial recruitment, participant recruitment strategies, randomised trials, telephone reminders, recruitment incentives, primary care, secondary care, research settings, trial retention
MeSH terms: Humans, Patient Education as Topic, Telephone, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Reminder Systems, Sample Size, Patient Selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks