A reinvestigation of recruitment to randomised, controlled, multicenter trials: a review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies

Sully, Ben G O; Julious, Steven A; Nicholl, Jon

doi:10.1186/1745-6215-14-166

Cited by 410Ethics in Clinical ResearchStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A reinvestigation of recruitment to randomised, controlled, multicenter trials: a review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies

Open access

Sully, Ben G O, Julious, Steven A, Nicholl, Jon·2013·Trials

DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-14-166PMC PMC3691846

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard assessment for health technologies. A key aspect of the design of any clinical trial is the target sample size. However, many publicly-funded trials fail to reach their target sample size. This study seeks to assess the current state of recruitment success and grant extensions in trials funded by the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) program and the UK Medical Research Council (MRC). METHODS: Data were gathered from two sources: the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) HTA Journal Archive and the MRC subset of the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) register. A total of 440 trials recruiting between 2002 and 2008 were assessed for eligibility, of which 73 met the inclusion criteria. Where data were unavailable from the reports, members of the trial team were contacted to ensure completeness. RESULTS: Over half (55%) of trials recruited their originally specified target sample size, with over three-quarters (78%) recruiting 80% of their target. There was no evidence of this improving over the time of the assessment. Nearly half (45%) of trials received an extension of some kind. Those that did were no more likely to successfully recruit. Trials with 80% power were less likely to successfully recruit compared to studies with 90% power. CONCLUSIONS: While recruitment appears to have improved since 1994 to 2002, publicly-funded trials in the UK still struggle to recruit to their target sample size, and both time and financial extensions are often requested. Strategies to cope with such problems should be more widely applied. It is recommended that where possible studies are planned with 90% power.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1745-6215-14-166

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Difficulties in recruiting are common in clinical trials and many trials may take longer to complete recruitment than planned.
“Difficulties in recruiting are common in clinical trials and many trials may take longer to complete recruitment than primarily planned (Sully et al., 2013).”
From Internet-based treatment for vulvodynia (EMBLA) – Study protocol for a randomised controlled study (2021) · cites this paper as Sully et al., 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
the CONSORT Group, Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-18 · Cited by 13,371
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., & for the CONSORT Group (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c332 · Cited by 9,329
What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies
McDonald, A. M., Knight, R. C., Campbell, M. K., Entwistle, V. A., Grant, A. M., Cook, J. A., Elbourne, D. R., Francis, D., Garcia, J., Roberts, I., et al. (2006) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-7-9 · Cited by 946
Statistics and ethics in medical research: III How large a sample?
Altman, D. G. (1980) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.281.6251.1336 · Cited by 581
Rethinking pragmatic randomised controlled trials: introducing the "cohort multiple randomised controlled trial" design
Relton, C., Torgerson, D. J., O’Cathain, A., & Nicholl, J. P. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c1066 · Cited by 519
Self-citation
Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials
Treweek, S., Mitchell, E., Pitkethly, M., Cook, J., Kjeldstrøm, M., Johansen, M., Taskila, T. K., Sullivan, F., Wilson, S., Jackson, C., et al. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.mr000013.pub5 · Cited by 378
Increasing recruitment to randomised trials: a review of randomised controlled trials
Watson, J. M., & Torgerson, D. J. (2006) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-34 · Cited by 333
Sample Sizes for Clinical Trials
Julious, S. (2009) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781584887409 · Cited by 102
Self-citation
The advantages and disadvantages of adaptive designs for clinical trials
Bauer, P., & Brannath, W. (2004) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/s1359-6446(04)03023-5 · Cited by 59
Recruitment to multicentre trials
Gates, S., Brocklehurst, P., Campbell, M., & Elbourne, D. R. (2003) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00011.x · Cited by 30

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

Puffer S, Torgerson DJ: Recruitment difficulties in randomised controlled trials. Control Clin Trials. 2003, 24: 214s-215s.

Sorted by citations

Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks
Kaye, J., Whitley, E. A., Lund, D., Morrison, M., Teare, H., & Melham, K. (2015) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/ejhg.2014.71 · Cited by 780
Sample size requirements to estimate key design parameters from external pilot randomised controlled trials: a simulation study
Teare, M. D., Dimairo, M., Shephard, N., Hayman, A., Whitehead, A., & Walters, S. J. (2014) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-264 · Cited by 773
Impact of patient and public involvement on enrolment and retention in clinical trials: systematic review and meta-analysis
Crocker, J. C., Ricci‐Cabello, I., Parker, A., Hirst, J. A., Chant, A., Petit-Zeman, S., Evans, D., & Rees, S. (2018) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.k4738 · Cited by 650
Recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a review of trials funded and published by the United Kingdom Health Technology Assessment Programme
Walters, S. J., Bonacho dos Anjos Henriques-Cadby, I., Bortolami, O., Flight, L., Hind, D., Jacques, R. M., Knox, C., Nadin, B., Rothwell, J., Surtees, M., et al. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015276 · Cited by 560
Self-citation
Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management
Salman, R. A., Beller, E., Kagan, J., Hemminki, E., Phillips, R. S., Savulescu, J., Macleod, M. R., Wisely, J., & Chalmers, I. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62297-7 · Cited by 552
Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials
Treweek, S., Pitkethly, M., Cook, J., Fraser, C., Mitchell, E., Sullivan, F., Jackson, C., Taskila, T. K., & Gardner, H. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.mr000013.pub6 · Cited by 521
Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities
Bower, P., Brueton, V., Gamble, C., Treweek, S., Smith, C. T., Young, B., & Williamson, P. (2014) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-399 · Cited by 369
Determining sample size for progression criteria for pragmatic pilot RCTs: the hypothesis test strikes back!
Lewis, M., Bromley, K., Sutton, C. J., McCray, G., Myers, H. L., & Lancaster, G. A. (2021) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-021-00770-x · Cited by 330
Trial Forge Guidance 1: what is a Study Within A Trial (SWAT)?
Treweek, S. P., Bevan, S., Bower, P., Campbell, M., Christie, J., Clarke, M. J., Collett, C., Cotton, S. C., Devane, D., Elfeky, A., et al. (2018) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-018-2535-5 · Cited by 298
Guidance for using pilot studies to inform the design of intervention trials with continuous outcomes
Bell, M. L., Whitehead, A. L., & Julious, S. A. (2018) · Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.2147/clep.s146397 · Cited by 280
Self-citation
The thresholds for statistical and clinical significance – a five-step procedure for evaluation of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials
Jakobsen, J., Gluud, C., Winkel, P., Lange, T., & Wetterslev, J. (2014) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-34 · Cited by 191
Online Recruitment Methods for Web-Based and Mobile Health Studies: A Review of the Literature
Lane, T. S., Armin, J. S., & Gordon, J. S. (2015) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4359 · Cited by 193
Challenges, solutions and future directions in the evaluation of service innovations in health care and public health
Raine, R., Fitzpatrick, R. M., Barratt, H., Bevan, G., Black, N. A., Boaden, R., Bower, P., Campbell, M., Denis, J., Devers, K. J., et al. (2016) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr04160 · Cited by 194
Challenges in recruitment and retention of clinical trial subjects
Kadam, R., Borde, S., Madas, S., Salvi, S., & Limaye, S. (2016) · Perspectives in Clinical Research · doi:10.4103/2229-3485.184820 · Cited by 179
Factors that impact on recruitment to randomised trials in health care: a qualitative evidence synthesis
Houghton, C., Dowling, M., Meskell, P., Hunter, A., Gardner, H., Conway, A., Treweek, S. P., Sutcliffe, K., Noyes, J., Devane, D., et al. (2020) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.mr000045.pub2 · Cited by 180
Participant recruitment and retention in remote eHealth intervention trials: methods and lessons learned from a large randomized controlled trial of two web-based smoking interventions
Watson, N. L., Mull, K. E., Heffner, J. L., McClure, J. B., & Bricker, J. B. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/10351 · Cited by 118
Factors affecting recruitment into depression trials: Systematic review, meta-synthesis and conceptual framework
Hughes-Morley, A., Young, B., Waheed, W., Small, N., & Bower, P. (2015) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2014.10.005 · Cited by 132
Ethics and Privacy Implications of Using the Internet and Social Media to Recruit Participants for Health Research: A Privacy-by-Design Framework for Online Recruitment
Bender, J. L., Cyr, A. B., Arbuckle, L., & Ferris, L. E. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.7029 · Cited by 132
Recruitment, consent and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a review of trials published in the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Journals Library (1997–2020)
Jacques, R. M., Ahmed, R., Harper, J., Ranjan, A., Saeed, I., Simpson, R. M., & Walters, S. J. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059230 · Cited by 120
Factors that impact on recruitment to randomised trials in health care: a qualitative evidence synthesis
Houghton, C., Dowling, M., Meskell, P., Hunter, A., Gardner, H., Conway, A., Treweek, S. P., Sutcliffe, K., Noyes, J., Devane, D., et al. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.mr000045 · Cited by 132
Digital tools for the recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a systematic map
Frampton, G. K., Shepherd, J., Pickett, K., Griffiths, G., & Wyatt, J. C. (2020) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-020-04358-3 · Cited by 119
Healing Chronic Wounds: Current Challenges and Potential Solutions
Darwin, E., & Tomic‐Canic, M. (2018) · Current Dermatology Reports · doi:10.1007/s13671-018-0239-4 · Cited by 109
Designing and using incentives to support recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a scoping review and a checklist for design
Parkinson, B., Meacock, R., Sutton, M., Fichera, E., Mills, N., Shorter, G. W., Treweek, S. P., Harman, N., Brown, R. C. H., Gillies, K., et al. (2019) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-019-3710-z · Cited by 116
Recruitment challenges in clinical research including cancer patients and caregivers
Sygna, K., Johansen, S., & Ruland, C. M. (2015) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0948-y · Cited by 93
Making randomised trials more efficient: report of the first meeting to discuss the Trial Forge platform
Treweek, S. P., Altman, D. G., Bower, P., Campbell, M., Chalmers, I., Cotton, S. C., Craig, P., Crosby, D., Davidson, P., Devane, D., et al. (2015) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0776-0 · Cited by 92
Effectiveness and Ethics of Incentives for Research Participation
Halpern, S. D., Chowdhury, M., Bayes, B. A., Cooney, E. L., Hitsman, B. L., Schnoll, R. A., Lubitz, S. F., Reyes, C., Patel, M. S., Greysen, S. R., et al. (2021) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.5450 · Cited by 102
Patient-centered recruitment and retention for a randomized controlled study
Chhatre, S., Jefferson, A. E., Cook, R., Meeker, C. R., Kim, J. H., Hartz, K. M., Wong, Y., Caruso, A. M., Newman, D. K., Morales, K. H., et al. (2018) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-018-2578-7 · Cited by 83
A study of target effect sizes in randomised controlled trials published in the Health Technology Assessment journal
Rothwell, J. C., Julious, S. A., & Cooper, C. L. (2018) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-018-2886-y · Cited by 73
Self-citation
Is health research undertaken where the burden of disease is greatest? Observational study of geographical inequalities in recruitment to research in England 2013–2018
Bower, P., Grigoroglou, C., Anselmi, L., Kontopantelis, E., Sutton, M., Ashworth, M. J., Evans, P. H., Lock, S., Smye, S. W., & Abel, K. M. (2020) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-020-01555-4 · Cited by 73
Systematic techniques for assisting recruitment to trials (START): study protocol for embedded, randomized controlled trials
Rick, J., Graffy, J., Knapp, P., Small, N., Collier, D., Eldridge, S. M., Kennedy, A. P., Salisbury, C., Treweek, S. P., Torgerson, D. J., et al. (2014) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-407 · Cited by 73
Cohort profile: the Scottish Research register SHARE. A register of people interested in research participation linked to NHS data sets
McKinstry, B., Sullivan, F., Vasishta, S., Armstrong, R. A., Hanley, J., Haughney, J., Philip, S., Smith, B. H., Wood, A., & Palmer, C. N. A. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013351 · Cited by 73
Building clinical trials around patients: Evaluation and comparison of decentralized and conventional site models in patients with low back pain
Sommer-Meyer, C., Zuccolin, D., Arnera, V., Schmitz, N., Adolfsson, P., Colombo, N., Gilg, R., & McDowell, B. (2018) · Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications · doi:10.1016/j.conctc.2018.06.008 · Cited by 74
A systematic review of the efficiency of recruitment to stroke rehabilitation randomised controlled trials
McGill, K., Sackley, C. M., Godwin, J., McGarry, J., & Brady, M. (2020) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-019-3991-2 · Cited by 65
Intensive Triangulation of Qualitative Research and Quantitative Data to Improve Recruitment to Randomized Trials: The QuinteT Approach
Rooshenas, L., Paramasivan, S., Jepson, M., & Donovan, J. (2019) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732319828693 · Cited by 94
Are pilot trials useful for predicting randomisation and attrition rates in definitive studies: a review of publicly funded trials
Cooper, C. L., Whitehead, A., Pottrill, E., Julious, S. A., & Walters, S. J. (2018) · Clinical Trials · doi:10.1177/1740774517752113 · Cited by 59
Self-citation
The ethical anatomy of payment for research participants
Różyńska, J. K. (2022) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-022-10092-1 · Cited by 89
Development of an online resource for recruitment research in clinical trials to organise and map current literature
Kearney, A., Harman, N., Rosala‐Hallas, A., Beecher, C., Blazeby, J. M., Bower, P., Clarke, M. J., Cragg, W. J., Duane, S., Gardner, H., et al. (2018) · Clinical Trials · doi:10.1177/1740774518796156 · Cited by 59
Guidelines for reporting embedded recruitment trials
Forbes, G., & Madurasinghe, V. (2016) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-015-1126-y · Cited by 63
Who does not participate in telehealth trials and why? A cross-sectional survey
Foster, A., Horspool, K., Edwards, L., Thomas, C., Salisbury, C., Montgomery, A. A., & O’Cathain, A. (2015) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0773-3 · Cited by 59
A randomised, controlled trial of the effects of a mobile telehealth intervention on clinical and patient-reported outcomes in people with poorly controlled diabetes
Baron, J., Hirani, S. P., & Newman, S. P. (2016) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x16631628 · Cited by 55
Practical guide to sample size calculations: an introduction
Flight, L., & Julious, S. A. (2015) · Pharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1002/pst.1709 · Cited by 57
Self-citation
Discontinuation and non-publication of randomised clinical trials supported by the main public funding body in Switzerland: a retrospective cohort study
Amstutz, A., Schandelmaier, S., Frei, R., Surina, J., Agarwal, A., Olu, K. K., Alturki, R., von Niederhäusern, B., von Elm, E. B., & Briel, M. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016216 · Cited by 58
Missing steps in a staircase: a qualitative study of the perspectives of key stakeholders on the use of adaptive designs in confirmatory trials
Dimairo, M., Boote, J. D., Julious, S. A., Nicholl, J. P., & Todd, S. (2015) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0958-9 · Cited by 55
Self-citation
Trials need participants but not their feedback? A scoping review of published papers on the measurement of participant experience of taking part in clinical trials
Planner, C., Bower, P., Donnelly, A., Gillies, K., Turner, K. M., & Young, B. (2019) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-019-3444-y · Cited by 52
Conservative treatment for uncomplicated appendicitis in children: the CONTRACT feasibility study, including feasibility RCT
Hall, N. J., Sherratt, F. C., Eaton, S. D., Reading, I., Walker, E., Chorozoglou, M., Beasant, L., Wood, W., Stanton, M. P., Corbett, H. J., et al. (2021) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta25100 · Cited by 51
Recruitment strategies in randomised controlled trials of men aged 50 years and older: a systematic review
Bracken, K., Askie, L. M., KEECH, A. C., Hague, W. E., & Wittert, G. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025580 · Cited by 51
Predictors of recruitment and retention in randomized controlled trials of behavioural smoking cessation interventions: a systematic review and meta‐regression analysis
Bricca, A., Swithenbank, Z., SCOTT, N. W., Treweek, S. P., Johnston, M., Black, N., Hartmann‐Boyce, J., West, R., Michie, S., & de Bruin, M. (2021) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.15614 · Cited by 51
A systematic review describes models for recruitment prediction at the design stage of a clinical trial
Gkioni, E., Rius, R., Dodd, S. R., & Gamble, C. L. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.07.002 · Cited by 44
Sample size calculations for skewed distributions
Cundill, B., & Alexander, N. D. E. (2015) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-015-0023-0 · Cited by 49
Enrollment Challenges: Recruiting Men to Weight Loss Interventions
Rounds, T. J., & Harvey, J. R. (2019) · American Journal of Men s Health · doi:10.1177/1557988319832120 · Cited by 44
The challenge of equipoise in trials with a surgical and non-surgical comparison: a qualitative synthesis using meta-ethnography
Davies, L., Beard, D., Cook, J. A., Price, A., Osbeck, I., & Toye, F. (2021) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-021-05403-5 · Cited by 41
Improving recruitment to a study of telehealth management for long-term conditions in primary care: two embedded, randomised controlled trials of optimised patient information materials
Man, M.-S., Rick, J., & Bower, P. (2015) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0820-0 · Cited by 44
Oral Ondansetron versus Domperidone for Acute Gastroenteritis in Pediatric Emergency Departments: Multicenter Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
Marchetti, F., Bonati, M. R., Maestro, A., Zanon, D., Rovere, F., Arrighini, A., Barbi, E., Bertolani, P., Biban, P., Dalt, L. D., et al. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0165441 · Cited by 43
Challenges and Strategies in Recruiting Patients for a Trial on Patient-Centered Navigation in Age-Associated Diseases
Frost, N., Deckert, P. M., Nolte, C. H., Kohl, R., & Schreiber, S. J. (2024) · Annals of Pharmacy Education Safety and Public Health Advocacy · doi:10.51847/blhlqwftft · Cited by 40
A re-randomisation design for clinical trials
Kahan, B. C., Forbes, A. B., Doré, C. J., & Morris, T. P. (2015) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-015-0082-2 · Cited by 40
Recruitment strategies and patient selection in clinical trials for Parkinson's disease: Going viral and keeping science and ethics at the highest standards
Picillo, M., Kou, N., Barone, P., & Fasano, A. A. (2015) · Parkinsonism & Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.07.018 · Cited by 39
Protocol for the development of a CONSORT extension for RCTs using cohorts and routinely collected health data
Kwakkenbos, L., Juszczak, E., Hemkens, L. G., Sampson, M., Fröbert, O., Relton, C., Gale, C., Zwarenstein, M., Langan, S., Moher, D., et al. (2018) · Research Integrity and Peer Review · doi:10.1186/s41073-018-0053-3 · Cited by 37
Differences between information in registries and articles did not influence publication acceptance
van Lent, M., IntHout, J., & Out, H. J. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.019 · Cited by 40
A novel approach to conducting clinical trials in the community setting: utilizing patient-driven platforms and social media to drive web-based patient recruitment
Applequist, J., Burroughs, C., Ramirez, A., Merkel, P. A., Rothenberg, M. E., Trapnell, B. C., Desnick, R. J., Şahin, M., & Krischer, J. P. (2020) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-020-00926-y · Cited by 39
Development of a new adapted QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI-Two) for rapid application to RCTs underway with enrolment shortfalls—to identify previously hidden barriers and improve recruitment
Donovan, J., Jepson, M., Rooshenas, L., Paramasivan, S., Mills, N., Elliott, D., Wade, J., Reda, D. J., Blazeby, J. M., Moghanaki, D. M., et al. (2022) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-022-06187-y · Cited by 37
Factors associated with recruitment to randomised controlled trials in general practice: a systematic mixed studies review
Moffat, K. R., Shi, W., Cannon, P., & Sullivan, F. (2023) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-022-06865-x · Cited by 39
Depressed patients treated by homeopaths: a randomised controlled trial using the “cohort multiple randomised controlled trial” (cmRCT) design
Viksveen, P., Relton, C., & Nicholl, J. P. (2017) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2040-2 · Cited by 40
Self-citation
Solution Focused Brief Therapy in Post-Stroke Aphasia (SOFIA): feasibility and acceptability results of a feasibility randomised wait-list controlled trial
Northcott, S., Thomas, S., James, K., Simpson, A., Hirani, S. P., Barnard, R., & Hilari, K. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050308 · Cited by 37
Methods to improve patient recruitment and retention in stroke trials
Berge, E., Stapf, C., Salman, R. A., Ford, G. A., Sandercock, P. A., van der Worp, H. B., Petersson, J., Dippel, D. W. J., Krieger, D. W., & Lees, K. R. (2016) · International Journal of Stroke · doi:10.1177/1747493016641963 · Cited by 40
Projection of participant recruitment to primary care research: a qualitative study
White, D. A., & Hind, D. (2015) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-015-1002-9 · Cited by 35
Factors influencing participant compliance in acupuncture trials: An in-depth interview study
Cao, H., Li, X., Li, X.-L., Ward, L., Xie, Z.-G., Hu, H., Zhang, Y.-J., & Liu, J. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231780 · Cited by 35
Does prospective acceptability of an intervention influence refusal to participate in a randomised controlled trial? An interview study
Sekhon, M., Cartwright, M., Lawes-Wickwar, S., McBain, H. B., Ezra, D. G., Newman, S. P., & Francis, J. (2021) · Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications · doi:10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100698 · Cited by 36
Improving recruitment to a study of telehealth management for COPD: a cluster randomised controlled ‘study within a trial’ (SWAT) of a multimedia information resource
on behalf of the PSM COPD Group, Jolly, K. B., MRC START Group, Sidhu, M. S., Bower, P., & Madurasinghe, V. (2019) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-019-3496-z · Cited by 35
What can we learn from trial decliners about improving recruitment? Qualitative study
Hughes-Morley, A., Young, B., Hempel, R., Russell, I. T., Waheed, W., & Bower, P. (2016) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1626-4 · Cited by 34
Power estimations for non-primary outcomes in randomised clinical trials
Jakobsen, J. C., Ovesen, C., Winkel, P., Hilden, J., Gluud, C. N., & Wetterslev, J. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027092 · Cited by 35
Using the ‘Social Marketing Mix Framework’ to explore recruitment barriers and facilitators in palliative care randomised controlled trials? A narrative synthesis review
Dunleavy, L., Walshe, C., Oriani, A., & Preston, N. (2018) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/0269216318757623 · Cited by 33
The SALOME study: recruitment experiences in a clinical trial offering injectable diacetylmorphine and hydromorphone for opioid dependency
Oviedo‐Joekes, E., Marchand, K., Lock, K., Macdonald, S., Guh, D. P., & Schechter, M. T. (2015) · Substance Abuse Treatment Prevention and Policy · doi:10.1186/1747-597x-10-3 · Cited by 31
Successful recruitment to trials: findings from the SCIMITAR+ Trial
collaborative, O. B. O. T. S., Peckham, E. J., Arundel, C., Bailey, D., Callen, T., Cusack, C., Crosland, S., Foster, P., Herlihy, H., James, H., et al. (2018) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-018-2460-7 · Cited by 32
SOLACE: A Psychosocial Stigma Protection Intervention to Improve the Mental Health of Parents of Autistic Children—A Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial
Lodder, A., Papadopoulos, C., & Randhawa, G. (2020) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-020-04498-0 · Cited by 30
How can we successfully recruit depressed people? Lessons learned in recruiting depressed participants to a multi-site trial of a brief depression intervention (the ‘CLASSIC’ trial)
Brown, J. S. L., Murphy, C., Kelly, J., & Goldsmith, K. (2019) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-018-3033-5 · Cited by 33
Recruitment of family caregivers of persons with dementia: Lessons learned from a pilot randomized controlled trial
Joshi, S., Park, T., Brody, L. A., Cruz, K., Mukhi, P., Reid, M. C., Herr, K., Pillemer, K. A., & Riffin, C. A. (2023) · Frontiers in Pain Research · doi:10.3389/fpain.2023.1125914 · Cited by 29
The effect of optimised patient information materials on recruitment in a lung cancer screening trial: an embedded randomised recruitment trial
Parker, A., Knapp, P., Treweek, S. P., Madhurasinghe, V., Littleford, R. C., Gallant, S., Sullivan, F., Schembri, S., Rick, J., Graffy, J., et al. (2018) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-018-2896-9 · Cited by 29
Recruiting general practitioners and patients with dementia into a cluster randomised controlled trial: strategies, barriers and facilitators
Lech, S., O’Sullivan, J. L., Wellmann, L., Supplieth, J., Döpfmer, S., Gellert, P. R., Kuhlmey, A., & Nordheim, J. (2021) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-021-01253-6 · Cited by 32
A survey of facilitators and barriers to recruitment to the MAGNETIC trial
Kaur, G., Smyth, R. L., Powell, C., & Williamson, P. R. (2016) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1724-3 · Cited by 30
Evaluation of a Novel Blood Microsampling Device for Clinical Trial Sample Collection and Protein Biomarker Analysis
Xing, J., Loureiro, J., Patel, M. T., Mikhailov, D., & Ai, G. (2020) · Bioanalysis · doi:10.4155/bio-2020-0063 · Cited by 28
An investigation of the impact of futility analysis in publicly funded trials
Sully, B., Julious, S. A., & Nicholl, J. P. (2014) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-61 · Cited by 27
Self-citation
Sample‐size estimation is not reported in 24% of randomised controlled trials of inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review
Iheozor‐Ejiofor, Z., Lakunina, S., Gordon, M. A., Akintelure, D., Sinopoulou, V., & Akobeng, A. K. (2020) · United European Gastroenterology Journal · doi:10.1177/2050640620967899 · Cited by 27
Challenges Conveying Clinical Equipoise and Exploring Patient Treatment Preferences in an Oncology Trial Comparing Active Monitoring with Radiotherapy (ROAM/EORTC 1308)
Sherratt, F. C., Brown, S. L., Haylock, B. J., Francis, P., Hickey, H., Gamble, C. L., Jenkinson, M. D., & Young, B. (2020) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0571 · Cited by 27
Treatment preference and recruitment to pediatric RCTs: A systematic review
Beasant, L., Brigden, A., Parslow, R. M., Apperley, H., Keep, T., Northam, A., Wray, C., King, H., Langdon, R., Mills, N., et al. (2019) · Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications · doi:10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100335 · Cited by 25
Surgical fixation compared with cast immobilisation for adults with a bicortical fracture of the scaphoid waist: the SWIFFT RCT
Dias, J. J., Brealey, S., Cook, L., Fairhurst, C. M., Hinde, S., Leighton, P. A., Choudhary, S., Costa, M. L., Hewitt, C. E., Hodgson, S., et al. (2020) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta24520 · Cited by 27
Improving recruitment to pharmacological trials for illicit opioid use: findings from a qualitative focus group study
Neale, J., Tompkins, C. N. E., McDonald, R., & Strang, J. (2018) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.14163 · Cited by 25
Feasibility and acceptability of a proposed trial of acupuncture as an adjunct to lifestyle interventions for weight loss in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: a qualitative study
Ee, C., Smith, C. A., Costello, M., MacMillan, F., Moran, L., Baylock, B., & Teede, H. J. (2018) · BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12906-018-2358-7 · Cited by 24
Recruiting Dementia Caregivers Into Clinical Trials
Leach, M., Ziaian, T., Francis, A., & Agnew, T. (2016) · Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders · doi:10.1097/wad.0000000000000149 · Cited by 24
The Use of Web-Based Technologies in Health Research Participation: Qualitative Study of Consumer and Researcher Experiences
Pang, P. C., Chang, S., Verspoor, K. M., & Clavisi, O. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/12094 · Cited by 24
Barriers to recruiting and retaining psychosis carers: a case study on the lessons learned from the Caring for Caregivers (C4C) trial
Hazell, C. M., Jones, C. J., Pandey, A., & Smith, H. E. (2019) · BMC Research Notes · doi:10.1186/s13104-019-4832-9 · Cited by 24
A practical guide to implementing a successful social media recruitment strategy: lessons from the Eczema Monitoring Online trial
Baker, A., Mitchell, E. J., & Thomas, K. S. (2022) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-022-06839-z · Cited by 25
A protocol for a systematic review of non-randomised evaluations of strategies to improve participant recruitment to randomised controlled trials
Gardner, H., Fraser, C. M., MacLennan, G., & Treweek, S. P. (2016) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0308-3 · Cited by 24
Simulating clinical trial visits yields patient insights into study design and recruitment
Lim, S.-Y., Kivitz, A., McKinnell, D., Pierson, M. E., & O'Brien, F. S. (2017) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s137416 · Cited by 24
Meeting the challenges of recruitment to multicentre, community-based, lifestyle-change trials: a case study of the BeWEL trial
Treweek, S. P., Wilkie, E., Craigie, A. M., Caswell, S., Thompson, J., Steele, R. J., Stead, M., Anderson, A. S., & on behalf of the BeWEL team (2013) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-14-436 · Cited by 23
The many faces of recruitment in a randomized controlled trial
Pinto, B. M., & DUNSIGER, S. I. (2021) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2021.106285 · Cited by 23
Benefits and challenges of using the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design for testing an intervention for depression
Viksveen, P., Relton, C., & Nicholl, J. P. (2017) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2059-4 · Cited by 23
Self-citation
Can we achieve better recruitment by providing better information? Meta-analysis of ‘studies within a trial’ (SWATs) of optimised participant information sheets
Madurasinghe, V., Bower, P., Eldridge, S. M., Collier, D., Graffy, J., Treweek, S. P., Knapp, P., Parker, A., Rick, J., Salisbury, C., et al. (2021) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-021-02086-2 · Cited by 22
Randomised trials conducted using cohorts: a scoping review
Nickolls, B., Relton, C., Hemkens, L. G., Zwarenstein, M., Eldridge, S. M., McCall, S. J., Griffin, X. L., Sohanpal, R., Verkooijen, H. M., Maguire, J. L., et al. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075601 · Cited by 22
The impact of advertising patient and public involvement on trial recruitment: embedded cluster randomised recruitment trial
Hughes-Morley, A., Hann, M., Fraser, C., Meade, O., Lovell, K., Young, B., Roberts, C., Cree, L., More, D., O’Leary, N., et al. (2016) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1718-1 · Cited by 23
Using marketing theory to inform strategies for recruitment: a recruitment optimisation model and the txt2stop experience
Galli, L., Knight, R., Robertson, S., Hoile, E., Oladapo, O., Francis, D., & Free, C. (2014) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-182 · Cited by 22

What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies
McDonald, A. M., Knight, R. C., Campbell, M. K., Entwistle, V. A., Grant, A. M., Cook, J. A., Elbourne, D. R., Francis, D., Garcia, J., Roberts, I., et al. (2006) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-7-9 · Cited by 946
Recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a review of trials funded and published by the United Kingdom Health Technology Assessment Programme
Walters, S. J., Bonacho dos Anjos Henriques-Cadby, I., Bortolami, O., Flight, L., Hind, D., Jacques, R. M., Knox, C., Nadin, B., Rothwell, J., Surtees, M., et al. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015276 · Cited by 560
Self-citation
Recruitment, consent and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a review of trials published in the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Journals Library (1997–2020)
Jacques, R. M., Ahmed, R., Harper, J., Ranjan, A., Saeed, I., Simpson, R. M., & Walters, S. J. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059230 · Cited by 120
METHODOLOGY Open Access Meeting the challenges of b n Be Background of trials recruiting to target [2,3]. This may result in an TRIALS
(2016)
Do NIHR health technology assessment randomised clinical trials perform as well as expected?
Young, A., Raftery, J., Stanton, L., & Cook, A. (2013) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-14-s1-p92

Authors: Sully, B. G. O., Julious, S. A., & Nicholl, J.
Affiliations: University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author: Julious, Steven A
ORCID: Julious, Steven A
Nicholl, Jon
Venue: Trials
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 2013-06-09
Volume: 14
Issue: 1
Pages: 166-166
ISSN: 1745-6215 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-166
PMC: PMC3691846
OpenAlex: W2102725242
Cited by: 410
References: 10
Citations by year: 2026: 21 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 2
FWCI: 21.20
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: gold
doi.org
Licence: cc-by
Locations: Trials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
Funders: National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0512-10050)
Topics: Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords: trial recruitment, sample size, recruitment success, trial funding, health technology assessment, statistical power, National Institute for Health Research
MeSH terms: Data Interpretation, Statistical, United Kingdom, Humans, Research Support as Topic, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Models, Statistical, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Public Sector, Sample Size, Patient Selection, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

A reinvestigation of recruitment to randomised, controlled, multicenter trials: a review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks