Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21 st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills?
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, it has been proposed that unrealistic requirements for academics and medical doctors to publish in scientific journals, combined with monetary publication rewards, have led to forms of contract cheating offered by organizations known as paper mills. Paper mills are alleged to offer products ranging from research data through to ghostwritten fraudulent or fabricated manuscripts and submission services. While paper mill operations remain poorly understood, it seems likely that paper mills need to balance product quantity and quality, such that they produce or contribute to large numbers of manuscripts that will be accepted for publication. Producing manuscripts at scale may be facilitated by the use of manuscript templates, which could give rise to shared features such as textual and organizational similarities, the description of highly generic study hypotheses and experimental approaches, digital images that show evidence of manipulation and/or reuse, and/or errors affecting verifiable experimental reagents. Based on these features, we propose practical steps that editors, journal staff, and peer reviewers can take to recognize and respond to research manuscripts and publications that may have been produced with undeclared assistance from paper mills.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The similarities between and errors within SGK articles could reflect the undeclared involvement of organisations such as paper mills.
“We proposed that the similarities between and errors within SGK articles could reflect the undeclared involvement of organisations such as paper mills (13), which have been alleged to mass-produce fraudulent manuscripts for publication (24, 25).”
From Identification of human gene research articles with wrongly identified nucleotide sequences (2022) · cites this paper as [24]
Producing many gene research manuscripts at minimal cost could involve writers with either an incomplete understanding of the experiments that they are describing and/or limited time for quality control.
“We also proposed that producing many gene research manuscripts at minimal cost could involve writers with either an incomplete understanding of the experiments that they are describing and/or limited time for quality control (8, 24).”
From Identification of human gene research articles with wrongly identified nucleotide sequences (2022) · cites this paper as [24]
The production of manuscripts at scale could underpin unusual degrees of similarity between publications, as well as features such as superficial explanations for the analysis of particular genes, and generic experimental approaches.
“We proposed that the production of manuscripts at scale could underpin unusual degrees of similarity between publications, as well as features such as superficial explanations for the analysis of particular genes, and generic experimental approaches (8, 13, 24, 25, 26).”
From Identification of human gene research articles with wrongly identified nucleotide sequences (2022) · cites this paper as [24]
These conditions could lead to wrongly identified nucleotide sequences being a feature of gene research articles from paper mills, where incorrect sequences could also be reused across different manuscripts.
“These conditions could lead to wrongly identified nucleotide sequences being a feature of gene research articles from paper mills (8, 24) where incorrect sequences could also be reused across different manuscripts (11, 12, 13).”
From Identification of human gene research articles with wrongly identified nucleotide sequences (2022) · cites this paper as [24]
Unusual reagent errors combined with implausible or impossible results could flag that some affected articles are fraudulent.
“Such unusual reagent errors combined with implausible or impossible results could flag that some affected articles are fraudulent (8, 11, 12, 13, 24, 26).”
From Identification of human gene research articles with wrongly identified nucleotide sequences (2022) · cites this paper as [24]
Wrongly identified nucleotide sequences in the context of repetitive and superficially justified gene research could reflect the external involvement of organisations such as paper mills.
“We have previously proposed that wrongly identified nucleotide sequences in the context of repetitive and superficially justified gene research could reflect the external involvement of organisations such as paper mills (8, 13, 24, 26).”
From Identification of human gene research articles with wrongly identified nucleotide sequences (2022) · cites this paper as [24]
The availability of many human genes for experimental analysis, combined with research drivers that favour the continued investigation of genes of known function, may unwittingly provide an extensive source of topics around which gene research articles can be fraudulently created.
“The availability of many human genes for experimental analysis, combined with research drivers that favour the continued investigation of genes of known function (57, 58, 59), may unwittingly provide an extensive source of topics around which gene research articles can be fraudulently created (8, 24).”
From Identification of human gene research articles with wrongly identified nucleotide sequences (2022) · cites this paper as [24]
Clients of paper mills are likely to be academics, research students and clinicians who do not have the time, facilities and/or training to conduct the genuine research that is required of them.
“Clients of paper mills are likely to be academics, research students and clinicians who do not have the time, facilities and/or training to conduct the genuine research that is required of them (10,11,32,34,35).”
From Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
Paper mills are commercial entities that sell undeclared services in relation to research manuscripts and publications.
“'paper mill' is applied to commercial entities that (also) sell undeclared services in relation to research manuscripts and publications (8–12,32,33).”
From Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
Paper mills are alleged to operate in many countries and offer a variety of questionable and/or illegal services to a range of clients across different research disciplines.
“Paper mills are alleged to operate in many countries and to offer a variety of questionable and/or illegal services to a range of clients across different research disciplines (8–10,32,33).”
From Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
Clients are believed to be drawn to paper mills by imbalances between the pressures and opportunities to publish research in different settings.
“Clients are believed to be drawn to paper mills by imbalances between the pressures and opportunities to publish research in different settings (8,10,11,32,35,43).”
From Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
The current inability to achieve timely corrections of the published literature at scale specifically disadvantages genuine research, while providing an invaluable asset for paper mills.
“In summary, the current inability to achieve timely corrections of the published literature at scale specifically disadvantages genuine research, while providing an invaluable asset for paper mills (10).”
From Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
Paper mill employees are alleged to undertake manuscript submission, including simultaneous submission to multiple journals.
“Paper mill employees are also alleged to undertake manuscript submission, which can involve the simultaneous submission of manuscripts to multiple journals, presumably to increase the likelihood and speed of manuscript acceptance (10,32).”
From Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
Paper mill manuscripts that describe laboratory research will frequently include falsified or fabricated experimental results.
“It is predicted that paper mill manuscripts that describe laboratory research will frequently include falsified or fabricated experimental results, due to genuine laboratory research being difficult, expensive and slow (10,27,32,36,38).”
From Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
Targeted human gene research provides several scaling factors that could enable the production of many individual manuscripts.
“Targeted human gene research provides several scaling factors that could enable the production of many individual manuscripts (10,27,56) (Figure 4).”
From Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
The value of accelerating this rate-limiting step has undoubtedly been recognized by paper mills, through strategies such as editorial and peer review manipulation, and submissions of the same or very similar manuscripts to multiple journals.
“The value of accelerating this rate-limiting step has undoubtedly been recognized by paper mills, through strategies such as editorial and peer review manipulation, and submissions of the same or very similar manuscripts to multiple journals (8,10,32,33,35,63,73).”
From Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
Publishers and individual journals are becoming increasingly aware of paper mills, but this awareness is unlikely to extend to researchers, who generally expect low rates of outright research fraud.
“While publishers and individual journals are becoming increasingly aware of paper mills (8,10,32,36,62–73), this awareness is unlikely to extend to researchers, who generally expect low rates of outright research fraud (7,8).”
From Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
One repeatedly noted feature of suspected paper mill manuscripts and articles is the absence of mechanistic hypotheses to link genes, systems, and experimental approaches through novelty-based research justifications.
“One repeatedly noted feature of suspected paper mill manuscripts and articles is the absence of mechanistic hypotheses to link gene(s), systems, and experimental approaches through novelty-based research justifications (10,65,71).”
From Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
Journal requirements that insist on focussed research justifications and technical approaches could provide some level of deterrence, at least in the short-term.
“journal requirements that insist on focussed research justifications and technical approaches could provide some level of deterrence (10,71,89–92), at least in the short-term.”
From Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
Institutionally-supported education that provides information about features of problematic research and paper mills will allow trainees and researchers to more critically assess the literature that they use to inform their projects and experiments.
“Institutionally-supported education that provides information about features of problematic research and paper mills (Table 2) will allow trainees and researchers to more critically assess the literature that they use to inform their projects and experiments (8,10,27,32).”
From Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
Identification of verifiable errors such as wrongly identified nucleotide sequences or misidentified or contaminated cell line models could immediately precipitate the publication of an indexed editorial note or expression of concern.
“The identification of verifiable errors such as wrongly identified nucleotide sequences (38,39,54,56) or misidentified or contaminated cell line models (97) could immediately precipitate the publication of an indexed editorial note (10) or expression of concern.”
From Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
Widespread fraudulent gene research will encourage the financial support of unproductive research directions.
“Widespread fraudulent gene research will encourage the financial support of unproductive research directions”
From Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
Requirements to preprint manuscripts where both the submission date and journal are clearly displayed could reduce the burden of duplicate submissions on journals and peer reviewers.
“Requirements to preprint manuscripts where both the submission date and journal are clearly displayed (Table 3) could reduce the burden of duplicate submissions on journals and peer reviewers (10,72)”
From Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
At the time of manuscript submission, paper mills can increase manuscript acceptance rates by simply submitting the same manuscripts to multiple journals.
“At the time of manuscript submission, paper mills can increase manuscript acceptance rates by simply submitting the same manuscripts to multiple journals”
From Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
Paper mills will also be selectively disadvantaged by geometrically increasing the rate and scale of post-publication corrections.
“Paper mills will also be selectively disadvantaged by geometrically increasing the rate and scale of post-publication corrections (10) (Table 3).”
From Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
Submitting the same manuscripts to multiple journals is highly wasteful of editorial and peer review resources.
“which is highly wasteful of editorial and peer review resources (10,32,36,72).”
From Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
To date, manuscripts or articles that may have been produced with assistance from paper mills have been recognised by researchers analysing unexpected literature trends and/or verifiable errors, and by journal editors and experts describing unusual manuscript or publication features.
“To date, manuscripts or articles that may have been produced with assistance from paper mills has been recognised by researchers analysing unexpected literature trends (38,85,86) and/or verifiable errors (38,39,56) and by journal editors and experts describing unusual manuscript or publication features (10,36,37,62–73,82).”
From Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
Requirements to preprint manuscripts where both the submission date and journal are clearly displayed could reduce the numbers of paper mill manuscripts that are accepted for publication.
“and the numbers of paper mill manuscripts that are accepted for publication.”
From Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
Widespread fraudulent gene research will reduce confidence in research and the scientific method.
“and reduce confidence in research and the scientific method (10,33,56).”
From Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
Widespread fraudulent gene research will slow research translation through opportunity costs.
“slow research translation through opportunity costs”
From Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
Byrne and Christopher (2020) have identified two types of fraudulent images: invented images and stock images.
“Byrne and Christopher (Byrne and Christopher, 2020) have identified two types of fraudulent images: invented images and stock images.”
From Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills (2020) · cites this paper as Byrne and Christopher, 2020
Fabricated research papers are readily available for purchase by scientists driven by the need to publish more papers to further their careers.
“Moreover, it appears that fabricated research papers are readily available for purchase by scientists driven by the need to publish more papers to further their careers (see Byrne and Christopher, 2020).”
From Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills (2020) · cites this paper as Byrne and Christopher, 2020
Stock images tend only to be spotted by eagle-eyed readers if repeated in multiple submissions or publications.
“They tend only to be spotted by eagle-eyed readers if repeated in multiple submissions or publications.”
From Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills (2020) · cites this paper as Byrne and Christopher, 2020
Invented images are typically western blots, and might include placing individual bands onto false backgrounds, non-linear adjustments, the splicing of multiple images to suggest they come from the same gel, duplicated bands and lanes, and grouping or consolidation of the data (e.g. removal of lanes).
“Invented images are typically western blots, and might include placing individual bands onto false backgrounds, non-linear adjustments, the splicing of multiple images to suggest they come from the same gel, duplicated bands and lanes, and grouping or consolidation of the data (e.g. removal of lanes) (see Box 1).”
From Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills (2020) · cites this paper as Byrne and Christopher, 2020
Stock images are more difficult to detect and show none of the manipulation likely from the production of invented images.
“Stock images are more difficult to detect and show none of the manipulation likely from the production of invented images.”
From Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills (2020) · cites this paper as Byrne and Christopher, 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669 · see citing works
The Cellosaurus, a Cell-Line Knowledge Resource
Bairoch, A. (2018) · Journal of Biomolecular Techniques JBT · doi:10.7171/jbt.18-2902-002 · Cited by 807 · see citing works
Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action
Fire, M., & Guestrin, C. (2019) · GigaScience · doi:10.1093/gigascience/giz053 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Pertea, M., Shumate, A., Pertea, G., Varabyou, A., Breitwieser, F. P., Chang, Y.-C., Madugundu, A. K., Pandey, A., & Salzberg, S. L. (2018) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1590-2 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Quan (2017) · doi:10.1108/ajim-01-2017-0014 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Large-scale investigation of the reasons why potentially important genes are ignored
Stoeger, T., Gerlach, M., Morimoto, R. I., & Nunes Amaral, L. A. (2018) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2006643 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Hvistendahl, M. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.342.6162.1035 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Gene annotation bias impedes biomedical research
Haynes, W. A., Tomczak, A., & Khatri, P. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-19333-x · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Quan, W., Chen, B., & Shu, F. (2017) · Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.01162 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Labbé, C., & Labbé, D. (2013) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0781-y · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Tian, M., Su, Y., & Ru, X. (2016) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications4020009 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Labbé, C., Grima, N., Gautier, T., Favier, B., & Byrne, J. A. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213266 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citationBioscience-scale automated detection of figure element reuse
Acuna, D. E., Brookes, P. S., & Kording, K. P. (2018) · doi:10.1101/269415 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Byrne, J. A., & Labbé, C. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2209-6 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationIncidences of problematic cell lines are lower in papers that use RRIDs to identify cell lines
Babic, Z., Capes-Davis, A., Martone, M. E., Bairoch, A., Ozyurt, I. B., Gillespie, T. H., & Bandrowski, A. E. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.41676 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
We need to talk about systematic fraud
Byrne, J. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-019-00439-9 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationSystematic fabrication of scientific images revealed
Christopher, J. (2018) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1002/1873-3468.13201 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationWhy serious academic fraud occurs in China
Lin, S. (2012) · Learned Publishing · doi:10.1087/20130105 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Byrne, J. A., Grima, N., Capes-Davis, A., & Labbé, C. (2019) · Biomarker Insights · doi:10.1177/1177271919829162 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationConcern noted: a descriptive study of editorial expressions of concern in PubMed and PubMed Central
Vaught, M., Jordan, D. C., & Bastian, H. (2017) · Research Integrity and Peer Review · doi:10.1186/s41073-017-0030-2 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Journal Retractions: Some Unique Features of Research Misconduct in China
Liu, X., & Chen, X. (2018) · Journal of Scholarly Publishing · doi:10.3138/jsp.49.3.02 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Vorland, C. J., Brown, A. W., Ejima, K., Mayo‐Wilson, E., Valdez, D., & Allison, D. B. (2020) · European Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1111/eci.13190 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The fight against fake-paper factories that churn out sham science
Else, H., & Van Noorden, R. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-021-00733-5 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Reexamining assumptions about miRNA-guided gene silencing
Kilikevicius, A., Meister, G., & Corey, D. R. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab1256 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms
Parsons, S. D., Azevedo, F., Elsherif, M. M., Guay, S., Shahim, O. N., Govaart, G., Norris, E., O’Mahony, A., Parker, A. J., Todorović, A., et al. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01269-4 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Retracted papers originating from paper mills: cross sectional study
Candal-Pedreira, C., Ross, J. S., Ruano-Ravina, A., Egilman, D. S., Fernández, E., & Pérez-Ríos, M. (2022) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2022-071517 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
RetractedAbalkina, A. (2023) · Learned Publishing · doi:10.1002/leap.1574 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
China bans cash rewards for publishing papers
Mallapaty, S. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-020-00574-8 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
The raw truth about paper mills
Christopher, J. (2021) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1002/1873-3468.14143 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Self-citationSuchak, T., Aliu, A. E., Harrison, C., Zwiggelaar, R., Geifman, N., & Spick, M. (2025) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003152 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
The landscape of biomedical research
González-Márquez, R., Schmidt, L., Schmidt, B. M., Berens, P., & Kobak, D. (2024) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2024.100968 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Paper mill challenges: past, present, and future
Parker, L., Boughton, S., Bero, L., & Byrne, J. A. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111549 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Self-citationRetractions, Fake Peer Reviews, and Paper Mills
Rivera, H., & da Silva, J. A. T. (2021) · Journal of Korean Medical Science · doi:10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e165 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Cell line authentication: a necessity for reproducible biomedical research
Souren, N. Y., Fusenig, N. E., Heck, S., Dirks, W. G., Capes‐Davis, A., Bianchini, F., & Plass, C. (2022) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.2022111307 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Threats to scholarly research integrity arising from paper mills: a rapid scoping review
Pérez-Neri, I., Pineda, C., & Sandoval, H. (2022) · Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1007/s10067-022-06198-9 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
How Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology deals with fraudulent papers from paper mills
Seifert, R. (2021) · Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00210-021-02056-8 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Fake publications in biomedical science: red-flagging method indicates mass production
Sabel, B. A., Knaack, E., Gigerenzer, G., & Bilc, M.-I. (2026) · Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00210-025-04275-9 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
“…the recent emergence of commercial production of fake publications is a new and unprecedented development (Flanagin et al 1998; Wislar et al. 2011; Mavrogenis et al. 2018; Byrne 2019; Byrne and Christopher 2020; Else and Van Norden 2021; Sabel and Seifert 2021; Chawla 2022; Candal-Pedreira 2022).”
Byrne, J. A., Park, Y., Richardson, R. A. K., Pathmendra, P., Sun, M., & Stoeger, T. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1139 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
“Targeted human gene research provides several scaling factors that could enable the production of many individual manuscripts (10,27,56) (Figure 4).”
InfluentialSelf-citationExploratory analysis of text duplication in peer-review reveals peer-review fraud and paper mills
Day, A. (2022) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-022-04504-5 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Fake Publications in Biomedical Science: Red-flagging Method Indicates Mass Production
Sabel, B. A., Knaack, E., Gigerenzer, G., & Bilc, M. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.05.06.23289563 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Identification of human gene research articles with wrongly identified nucleotide sequences
Park, Y., West, R. A., Pathmendra, P., Favier, B., Stoeger, T., Capes-Davis, A., Cabanac, G., Labbé, C., & Byrne, J. A. (2022) · Life Science Alliance · doi:10.26508/lsa.202101203 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
“We proposed that the similarities between and errors within SGK articles could re fl ect the undeclared involvement of organisations such as paper mills (13), which have been alleged to mass-produce fraudulent manuscripts for publication (24, 25).”
InfluentialSelf-citationHeck, S., Bianchini, F., Souren, N. Y., Wilhelm, C., Ohl, Y., & Plass, C. (2021) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.33604 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Candal‐Pedreira, C., Guerra-Tort, C., Ruano‐Raviña, A., Freijedo-Farinas, F., Rey‐Brandariz, J., Ross, J. S., & Pérez‐Ríos, M. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111397 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
RetractedPaper mills and on-demand publishing: Risks to the integrity of journal indexing and metrics
da Silva, J. A. T. (2020) · Medical Journal Armed Forces India · doi:10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.08.003 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
When beauty is but skin deep: dealing with problematic studies in systematic reviews
Boughton, S. L., Wilkinson, J., & Bero, L. (2021) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.ed000152 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Wittau, J., & Seifert, R. (2024) · Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00210-024-03272-8 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Enhancing the trustworthiness of pain research: A call to action.
O'Connell, N. E., Belton, J. L., Crombez, G., Eccleston, C., Fisher, E., Ferraro, M. C., Hood, A., Keefe, F. J., Knaggs, R., Norris, E., et al. (2024) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104736 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Paper mills: a novel form of publishing malpractice affecting psychology
Bishop, D., & Abalkina, A. (2023) · Meta-Psychology · doi:10.15626/mp.2022.3422 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Abuse of ORCID’s weaknesses by authors who use paper mills
Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2021) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-021-03996-x · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Sabel, B. A., & Seifert, R. (2021) · Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00210-021-02158-3 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Scancar, B., Byrne, J. A., Causeur, D., & Barnett, A. G. (2026) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2025-087581 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationCitation Contamination by Paper Mill Articles in Systematic Reviews of the Life Sciences
Tang, G., & Cai, H. (2025) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.15160 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Dramatic increases in redundant publications in the Generative AI era
Maupin, D. J., Suchak, T., Barnett, A. G., & Spick, M. P. (2025) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-025-04569-y · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills
Hackett, R., & Kelly, S. (2020) · Biology Open · doi:10.1242/bio.056556 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
An Analysis of Recently Retracted Articles by Authors Affiliated with Hospitals in Mainland China
Zhao, T., Dai, T., Lun, Z., & Gao, Y. (2021) · Journal of Scholarly Publishing · doi:10.3138/jsp.52.2.03 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Identifying fabricated networks within authorship-for-sale enterprises
Porter, S. J., & McIntosh, L. D. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-71230-8 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Science integrity has been never more important: it's all about trust
Behl, C. (2021) · Journal of Cellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1002/jcb.29906 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Misspellings or “miscellings”—Non‐verifiable and unknown cell lines in cancer research publications
Oste, D. J., Pathmendra, P., Richardson, R. A. K., Johnson, G., Ao, Y., Arya, M. D., Enochs, N. R., Hussein, M., Kang, J., Lee, A., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.34995 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationSantos-d’Amorim, K., Wang, T., Lund, B. D., & dos Santos, R. N. M. (2022) · Ethics & Behavior · doi:10.1080/10508422.2022.2141747 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
da Silva, J. A. T., Daly, T. P., Türp, J. C., Sabel, B. A., & Kendall, G. (2024) · Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00210-024-03177-6 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Shah, J. N., Shah, J., Baral, G., Baral, R., & Shah, J. (2022) · Nepal Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.3126/njog.v16i2.42085 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Correia, M. I. T. D. (2023) · Clinical Nutrition Open Science · doi:10.1016/j.nutos.2022.12.010 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Five problems plaguing publishing in the life sciences—and one common cause
Wright, D. E. (2024) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1002/1873-3468.15018 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Wittau, J., Celik, S., Kacprowski, T., Deserno, T. M., & Seifert, R. (2023) · Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00210-023-02741-w · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Metadata analysis of retracted fake papers in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology
Wittau, J., & Seifert, R. (2023) · Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00210-023-02850-6 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Unveiling scientific articles from paper mills with provenance analysis
Cardenuto, J. P., Moreira, D., & Rocha, A. D. R. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0312666 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
van Diest, R. A., Seifert, R., & van der Heyden, M. A. G. (2025) · Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00210-024-03697-1 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Pathmendra, P., Park, Y., Enguita, F. J., & Byrne, J. A. (2024) · Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00210-023-02846-2 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationThe 1-h fraud detection challenge
van der Heyden, M. A. G. (2021) · Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00210-021-02120-3 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Wilkinson, J., Heal, C., Antoniou, G. A., Flemyng, E., Avenell, A., Barbour, V., Bordewijk, E. M., Brown, N. J. L., Clarke, M., Dumville, J., et al. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111512 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
da Silva, J. A. T. (2021) · Epistēmēs Metron Logos · doi:10.12681/eml.27238 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Fontaíña, N. M., Candal‐Pedreira, C., García, G., Ross, J. S., Ruano‐Raviña, A., & Gisbert, L. M. (2025) · Research Integrity and Peer Review · doi:10.1186/s41073-025-00177-9 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Nazarovets, S. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-4060-4_14 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Readership Awareness Series – Paper 3: Paper Mills
Ali, M. J., & Djalilian, A. R. (2023) · Seminars in Ophthalmology · doi:10.1080/08820538.2023.2178181 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Research paper mills”: A factory outlet for dubious research
Nagarkar, S. P. (2024) · Indian Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.20529/ijme.2024.025 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
The challenges of open access data
Brayne, C., O’Mahoney, P., Feeney, J. C., & Kenny, R. A. (2022) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02721-5 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Berrío, J. P., & Kalliokoski, O. (2025) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1002/1873-3468.70077 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Is there a need for creators of imaginary authors to face legal consequences?
da Silva, J. A. T. (2020) · Croatian Medical Journal · doi:10.3325/cmj.2020.61.561 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Matusz, P. J., Abalkina, A., & Bishop, D. (2025) · Mind Brain and Education · doi:10.1111/mbe.12436 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Editorial: The “publish and perish” phenomenon: how journals can be affected by it and survive
Hourneaux, F., Hamza, K. M., & Cordeiro, R. A. (2024) · RAUSP Management Journal · doi:10.1108/rausp-07-2024-280 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
A new chapter for a better <i>Bioscience Reports</i>
Cooper, C. D. O., & Han, W. (2021) · Bioscience Reports · doi:10.1042/bsr20211016 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Combatting the rise of paper mills
Calver, M. (2021) · Pacific Conservation Biology · doi:10.1071/pcv27n1_ed · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Paper mills, fraudulent authors, and editorial responses
Smart, P. (2023) · Science Editing · doi:10.6087/kcse.314 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Aquarius, R., Bik, E. M., BIMLER, D. L., Oksvold, M. P., & Patrick, K. (2025) · Bioengineered · doi:10.1080/21655979.2025.2542668 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Significado y trascendencia de los paper mills o fábricas de artículos
Pulido, M. (2024) · Medicina Clínica · doi:10.1016/j.medcli.2024.02.029 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
The research literature is an unsafe workplace
Byrne, J. A., & Barnett, A. G. (2024) · Accountability in Research · doi:10.1080/08989621.2024.2428205 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationWu, M.-Y. M., & Rodriguez, J.-M. G. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00064 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Paper Mills – Research report from COPE & STM
COPE, S. (2024) · Science Editor and Publisher · doi:10.24069/sep-23-28 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Readership awareness series – Paper 3: Paper mills
Ali, M. J., & Djalilian, A. R. (2023) · The Ocular Surface · doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2023.02.001 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
The rapid growth in Mendelian randomization studies
Hemani, G., Stender, S., Wolters, F. J., Albert Hofman, D., & Smith, G. D. (2025) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s10654-025-01317-7 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Systematic Reviewers Have an Obligation to Promote Research Integrity
Bero, L. A. (2025) · The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics · doi:10.1017/jme.2025.34 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Preserving Academic Integrity: Combating the Proliferation of Paper Mills in Scholarly Publishing
Deo, P. S., & Hangsing, P. (2024) · Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries · doi:10.1080/15424065.2024.2388039 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
IDIOMATIC EXPRESSION TRANSLATION STRATEGY IN RHONDA BYRNE’S BOOK THE MAGIC
Fitriyah, F. (2020) · LANGUAGE LITERACY Journal of Linguistics Literature and Language Teaching · doi:10.30743/ll.v4i2.3113 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Steering towards success in stormy times: FEBS Open Bio in 2021
la Rosa, M. Á. D. (2021) · FEBS Open Bio · doi:10.1002/2211-5463.13058 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Integrity measures take their toll: introducing a complete supplement issue with retractions only
Behl, C. (2021) · Journal of Cellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1002/jcb.30145 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Suspected distortion of citations in high-impact cancer journals
Scancar, B., Byrne, J. A., Causeur, D., & Barnett, A. G. (2026) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2618402123 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationЧИ Є МАЙБУТНЄ В НАУКОВИХ ЖУРНАЛІВ? ЗМІНИ, ВИКЛИКИ Й ТЕНДЕНЦІЇ В АКАДЕМІЧНОМУ ВИДАВНИЦТВІ
Ярошенко, Т., & Ярошенко, О. (2024) · Open Science and Innovation · doi:10.62405/osi.2024.02.04 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Explainable Artifacts for Synthetic Western Blot Source Attribution
Cardenuto, J. P., Mandelli, S., Moreira, D., Bestagini, P., Delp, E. J., & Rocha, A. D. R. (2024) · IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/wifs61860.2024.10810680 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
The use of “tortured phrases” in science communication
Samal, J. (2025) · Indian Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.20529/ijme.2025.036 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Trustworthiness assessment of published clinical trials: Literature review of domains and questions
Alfirević, Ž., & Weeks, J. (2024) · Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods · doi:10.1002/cesm.12099 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Harness editors’ networks of communication to fight publication fraud
Hu, G. (2023) · Accountability in Research · doi:10.1080/08989621.2023.2199931 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Hansson, S. O. (2020) · Theoria · doi:10.1111/theo.12299 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Editorial: preventing the publication of falsified research
(2021) · Toxicology Research · doi:10.1093/toxres/tfab090 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Temporal shifts in retraction reasons
Xia, J. (2025) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/jd-07-2025-0185 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Rétractations dans la recherche biomédicale (2000-présent)
Haiech, J., Noûs, C., & Forest, C. D. (2025) · médecine/sciences · doi:10.1051/medsci/2025162 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Marcelino, R. (2026) · Research Integrity and Peer Review · doi:10.1186/s41073-026-00197-z · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Plagiarism in Philosophy Research
Dougherty, M. V. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-99680-2_38 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Hersh, W. (2020) · Health informatics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-47686-1_2 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Paper Mills for research writing and publication: A threat to the integrity of science
Shah, J. N., & Shah, J. (2021) · Journal of Kathmandu Medical College · doi:10.3126/jkmc.v10i4.43865 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
The complex ecosystem of hyperprolific authors
Almeida, J. M., Antelmi, A., Gonçalves, M. A., & Pellegrino, M. A. (2026) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-026-05563-8 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Fábrica de manuscritos: la ciencia y su integridad en peligro
Silva-Díaz, H. (2024) · Revista Experiencia en Medicina del Hospital Regional Lambayeque · doi:10.37065/rem.v9i4.740 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Paper mills, fraudulent authors, and editorial responses
Smart, P. (2024) · Science Editor and Publisher · doi:10.24069/sep-23-19 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Frisch, K., Hagenström, F., & Reeg, N. (2022) · Science studies · doi:10.1515/9783839459669 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Going Platinum: The European Journal of Soil Science at 75
Dungait, J. A. J., Evans, D., Farrell, M., He, H., Heuvelink, G. B. M., & Schmidt, O. (2024) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/ejss.13473 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Benlidayı, İ. C. (2025) · Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics · doi:10.47316/cajmhe.2025.6.1.09 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Exploitation of intellectual property systems for the manipulation of academic reputations
Richardson, R. A. K., Wise, N. H., Hong, S. S., Draper, M. J., & Fackrell, S. (2025) · International Journal for Educational Integrity · doi:10.1007/s40979-025-00185-8 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Ożegalska-Trybalska, J. (2021) · Nowotwory Journal of Oncology · doi:10.5603/njo.2021.0058 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Shimoda, L. A., Bai, C., Bartlett, N. W., Bastarache, J. A., Feghali‐Bostwick, C. A., Kuebler, W. M., Prakash, Y. S., Schmidt, E. P., & Morty, R. E. (2021) · American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajplung.00239.2021 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Kadomatsu, K. (2020) · The Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1093/jb/mvaa110 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Unmasking the fraud: How paper mills are undermining scientific publishing
Chambers, H. (2024) · Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology · doi:10.1111/dmcn.15997 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Liang, L., & Acuna, D. E. (2020) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/pra2.306
- Authors
- Byrne, J. A., & Christopher, J.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Byrne, Jennifer A.
- Christopher, Jana
- Venue
- FEBS Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 594
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 583-589
- ISSN
- 0014-5793 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-3468
- OpenAlex
- W3008906624
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 11
- FWCI
- 23.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- FEBS Letters (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Keywords
- paper mills, contract cheating, research misconduct, peer review, publication ethics, ghostwriting, data fabrication, image editing, research integrity, journal editors
- MeSH terms
- Paper, Periodicals as Topic, Publishing, Peer Review, Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review