Cited by 7

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Proteolysis of the low‐density lipoprotein receptor in hepatocytes is mediated by BMP1 but not by other astacin proteases

Kellett, Katherine A. B., Fisher, Kate, Aldworth, Harry, Hooper, Nigel M.·2023·FEBS Letters

Abstract

Bone morphogenetic protein 1 (BMP1), a member of the astacin family of zinc‐metalloproteases, proteolytically cleaves the low‐density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) within its ligand‐binding domain, reducing the binding and cellular uptake of LDL‐cholesterol. Here, we aimed to determine whether astacin proteases other than BMP1 may also cleave LDLR. Although human hepatocytes express all six astacin proteases, including the meprins and mammalian tolloid, we found through pharmacological inhibition and genetic knockdown that only BMP1 contributed to the cleavage of LDLR in its ligand‐binding domain. We also found that the minimum amino acid change required to render mouse LDLR susceptible to cleavage by BMP1 is mutation at the P1′ and P2 positions of the cleavage site. When expressed in cells, the resulting humanised‐mouse LDLR internalised LDL‐cholesterol. This work provides insight into the biological mechanisms regulating LDLR function.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/1873-3468.14667

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 120 kDa LDLR species is primarily a BMP1 cleavage product present at the cell surface and not an intracellular immature form of the receptor.

    “However, recent research has shown that this 120 kDa species is in fact primarily a BMP1 cleavage product present at the cell surface and not an intracellular immature form of the receptor [63].”

    From Post-translational regulation of the low-density lipoprotein receptor provides new targets for cholesterol regulation (2024) · cites this paper as [63]

    The Results section reports that the 130 kDa band in primary hepatocytes is predominantly a BMP1-cleaved LDLR fragment at the cell surface, rather than an intracellular precursor. The paper also describes a 120 kDa BMP1-generated fragment, but the experiment distinguishing a cell-surface cleavage product from an immature receptor specifically concerns the 130 kDa band. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • BMP1 is involved in cleaving the LDLR in human primary hepatocytes and in human liver and adrenal samples.

    “However, there is evidence that BMP1 is involved in cleaving the LDLR in human primary hepatocytes and in human liver and adrenal samples [37,61,63], and the 36–40 kDa N-terminal fragment is present in human urine, likely due to clearance from the blood plasma by the kidneys [61].”
  • The site of cleavage in human LDLR by BMP1 is highly specific, between residues Gly192 and Asp193, with the Asp residue being crucial for cleavage.

    “The site of cleavage in human LDLR by BMP1 is highly specific, between residues Gly192 and Asp193, with the Asp residue being crucial for cleavage [37,61,63].”
  • BMP1 does not cleave murine LDLR because the cleavage-essential Asp193 is replaced with valine in mice.

    “Intriguingly, BMP1 does not cleave murine LDLR [56,108] since the cleavage-essential Asp193 is replaced with valine in mice.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. 10.1038/clpt.2014.95 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/s41580-019-0190-7 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1038/s41598-019-47814-0 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1093/hmg/ddz238 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)37702-0 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/S0021-9258(20)88240-4 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1021/jm061010z · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.matbio.2007.05.004 · DOI
  9. 10.1515/hsz-2012-0149 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.03.045 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/2211-5463.12540 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90423-3 · DOI
  13. 10.1006/geno.1996.0260 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)31672-7 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2017.05.011 · DOI
  16. 10.1073/pnas.92.14.6334 · DOI
  17. 10.1074/jbc.M413468200 · DOI
  18. 10.1515/BC.2007.054 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/srep21456 · DOI
  20. 10.1093/hmg/ddz164 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kellett, K. A. B., Fisher, K., Aldworth, H., & Hooper, N. M.
Affiliations
Division of Neuroscience, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health University of Manchester UK
Venue
FEBS Letters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-06
Volume
597
Issue
11
Pages
1489-1502
ISSN
  • 0014-5793
  • 1873-3468
Cited by
7
References
1
Language
en
Funders
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/S016848/1)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/L009625/1)
  • University of Manchester

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review