Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Different combinations of cysteine-rich repeats mediate binding of low density lipoprotein receptor to two different proteins

Russell, D W, Brown, M S, Goldstein, J L·1989·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Seven imperfect repeats of a 40-amino acid cysteine-rich sequence constitute the ligand binding domain of the low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor. To assess the contribution of each repeat, three site-directed mutations were made individually in each repeat: 1) deletion of the repeat, 2) substitution of a conserved isoleucine with aspartic acid, and 3) substitution of a conserved aspartic acid with tyrosine. cDNAs containing these mutations were transfected into simian COS cells and assayed for their ability to bind LDL, which contains a 500-kDa protein ligand (apoB-100), and beta-migrating very low density lipoprotein (beta-VLDL), which contains multiple copies of a 33-kDa ligand (apoE). The results showed that binding of the two ligands required different combinations of repeats. LDL binding required repeats 3-7; deletion of any one of these repeats markedly reduced LDL binding. In contrast, beta-migrating very low density lipoprotein binding was insensitive to the loss of any single repeat with the important exception of repeat 5, whose loss reduced binding by 60%. The same effects were obtained when each of the repeats was altered by either of the two substitution mutations. The current findings suggest that a multiplicity of cysteine-rich repeats may allow a single protein to bind several different protein ligands by employing different combinations of repeats.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(20)88240-4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Doolittle, 1984, Nature, 307, 558, 10.1038/307558a0 · DOI
  2. Südhof, 1985, Science, 228, 815, 10.1126/science.2988123 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Appella, 1988, FEBS Lett, 231, 1, 10.1016/0014-5793(88)80690-2 · DOI
  4. Herz, 1988, EMBO J., 7, 4119, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03306.x · DOI
  5. Kelley, 1987, Cell, 51, 539, 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90123-1 · DOI
  6. Goldstein, 1985, Annu. Rev. Cell Biol., 1, 1, 10.1146/annurev.cb.01.110185.000245 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Südhof, 1985, Science, 228, 893, 10.1126/science.3873704 · DOI
  8. Haefliger, 1987, Biochemistry, 26, 3551, 10.1021/bi00386a045 · DOI
  9. Appella, 1987, J. Biol. Chem., 262, 4437, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)61211-6 · DOI
  10. Stearns, 1989, J. Biol. Chem., 264, 3352, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)94073-1 · DOI
  11. Zushi, 1989, J. Biol. Chem., 264, 10351, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)81626-X · DOI
  12. Esser, 1988, J. Biol. Chem., 13282, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)37702-0 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Scott, 1989, Mol. Biol. Med., 6, 65
  14. Mahley, 1988, Science, 240, 622, 10.1126/science.3283935 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Mahley, 1984, J. Lipid Res., 25, 1277, 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)34443-6 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Hobbs, 1986, J. Biol. Chem., 261, 13114, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)69278-6 · DOI
  17. van Driel, 1987, J. Biol. Chem., 262, 17443, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)45399-9 · DOI
  18. Zoller, 1984, DNA, 3, 479, 10.1089/dna.1.1984.3.479 · DOI
  19. Yamamoto, 1984, Cell, 39, 27, 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90188-0 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Okayama, 1983, Mol. Cell. Biol., 3, 280
  21. Andersson, 1989, J. Biol. Chem., 264, 8222, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)83172-6 · DOI
  22. Lowry, 1951, J. Biol. Chem., 193, 265, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6 · DOI
  23. Beisiegel, 1981, J. Biol. Chem., 256, 11923, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)68494-2 · DOI · Paper page
  24. van Driel, 1987, J. Biol. Chem., 262, 16127, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)47706-X · DOI · Paper page
  25. Yamamoto, 1986, Science, 232, 1230, 10.1126/science.3010466 · DOI
  26. Lee, 1989, Nucleic Acids Res., 17, 1259, 10.1093/nar/17.3.1259 · DOI
  27. Raychowdhury, 1989, Science, 244, 1163, 10.1126/science.2786251 · DOI
  28. Weisgraber, 1987, J. Biol. Chem., 262, 11097, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)60931-7 · DOI
  29. Goldstein, 1983, N. Engl. J. Med., 309, 288, 10.1056/NEJM198308043090507 · DOI
  30. Hobbs, 1989, J. Clin. Invest., 84, 656, 10.1172/JCI114212 · DOI
  31. Morgan, 1987, Nature, 329, 301, 10.1038/329301a0 · DOI
  32. Lobel, 1988, J. Biol. Chem., 263, 2563, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)69244-0 · DOI
  33. Oshima, 1988, J. Biol. Chem., 263, 2553, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)69243-9 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Russell, D. W., Brown, M. S., & Goldstein, J. L.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-12
Volume
264
Issue
36
Pages
21682-21688
ISSN
0021-9258
Cited by
253
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review