The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Global imaging of polar cap patches with dual airglow imagers
Abstract
During a 2 h interval from 2240 to 2440 UT on 12 November 2012, regions of increased 630.0 nm airglow emissions were simultaneously detected by dual all‐sky imagers in the polar cap, one at Longyearbyen, Norway (78.1°N, 15.5°E) and the other at Resolute Bay, Canada (74.7°N, 265.1°E). The Resolute Bay incoherent scatter radar observed clear enhancements of the F region electron density up to 10 12 m−3 within these airglow structures which indicates that these are optical manifestations of polar cap patches propagating across the polar cap. During this interval of simultaneous airglow imaging, the nightside/dawnside (dayside/duskside) half of the patches was captured by the imager at Longyearbyen (Resolute Bay). This unique situation enabled us to estimate the dawn‐dusk extent of the patches to be around 1500 km, which was at least 60–70% of the width of the antisunward plasma stream seen in the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network convection maps. In contrast to the large extent in the dawn‐dusk direction, the noon‐midnight thickness of each patch was less than 500 km. These observations demonstrate that there exists a class of patches showing cigar‐shaped structures. Such patches could be produced in a wide range of local time on the dayside nearly simultaneously and spread across many hours of local time soon after their generation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An Assessment of Earth's Climate Sensitivity Using Multiple Lines of Evidence
Sherwood, S. C., Webb, M. J., Annan, J. D., Armour, K. C., Forster, P. M., Hargreaves, J. C., Hegerl, G., Klein, S. A., Marvel, K. D., Rohling, E. J., et al. (2020) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2019rg000678 · Cited by 1,254
A global reanalysis of storm surges and extreme sea levels
Muis, S., Verlaan, M., Winsemius, H. C., Aerts, J. C. J. H., & Ward, P. J. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11969 · Cited by 731
Bach, L. T., Gill, S. J., Rickaby, R. E. M., Gore, S., & Renforth, P. (2019) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2019.00007 · Cited by 445
Twilley, R. R., Bentley, S. J., Chen, Q., Edmonds, D. A., Hagen, S. C., Lam, N. S.-N., Willson, C. S., Xu, K., Braud, D., Hampton Peele, R., et al. (2016) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-016-0374-4 · Cited by 150
IASI observations of sulfur dioxide (SO2) in the boundary layer of Norilsk
Bauduin, S., Clarisse, L., Clerbaux, C., Hurtmans, D., & Coheur, P. (2014) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1002/2013jd021405 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Hosokawa, K., Taguchi, S., Shiokawa, K., Otsuka, Y., Ogawa, Y., & Nicolls, M.
- Venue
- Geophysical Research Letters
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2014-01-14
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-6
- ISSN
- 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8007
- OpenAlex
- W2071694890
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global imaging of polar cap patches with dual airglow imagers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/2013gl058748
- The paper
- Hosokawa, K., Taguchi, S., Shiokawa, K., Otsuka, Y., Ogawa, Y., & Nicolls, M. (2014). Global imaging of polar cap patches with dual airglow imagers. Geophysical Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013gl058748
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.