The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving InSAR geodesy using Global Atmospheric Models
Open accessAbstract
Spatial and temporal variations of pressure, temperature, and water vapor content in the atmosphere introduce significant confounding delays in interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) observations of ground deformation and bias estimates of regional strain rates. Producing robust estimates of tropospheric delays remains one of the key challenges in increasing the accuracy of ground deformation measurements using InSAR. Recent studies revealed the efficiency of global atmospheric reanalysis to mitigate the impact of tropospheric delays, motivating further exploration of their potential. Here we explore the effectiveness of these models in several geographic and tectonic settings on both single interferograms and time series analysis products. Both hydrostatic and wet contributions to the phase delay are important to account for. We validate these path delay corrections by comparing with estimates of vertically integrated atmospheric water vapor content derived from the passive multispectral imager Medium‐Resolution Imaging Spectrometer, onboard the Envisat satellite. Generally, the performance of the prediction depends on the vigor of atmospheric turbulence. We discuss (1) how separating atmospheric and orbital contributions allows one to better measure long‐wavelength deformation and (2) how atmospheric delays affect measurements of surface deformation following earthquakes, and (3) how such a method allows us to reduce biases in multiyear strain rate estimates by reducing the influence of unevenly sampled seasonal oscillations of the tropospheric delay.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system
Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi, S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P., et al. (2011) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1002/qj.828 · Cited by 24,480
Berardino, P., Fornaro, G., Lanari, R., et al. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2002.803792 · Cited by 5,331
MERRA: NASA’s Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications
Rienecker, M. M., Suarez, M. J., Gelaro, R., Todling, R., Bacmeister, J., Liu, E., Bosilovich, M. G., Schubert, S. D., Takacs, L., Kim, G.-K., et al. (2011) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-11-00015.1 · Cited by 4,852
North American Regional Reanalysis
Mesinger, F., DiMego, G., Kalnay, E., Mitchell, K., Shafran, P. C., Ebisuzaki, W., Jović, D., Woollen, J., Rogers, E., Berbery, E. H., et al. (2006) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-87-3-343 · Cited by 3,378
The displacement field of the Landers earthquake mapped by radar interferometry
Massonnet, D., Rossi, M., Carmona, C., Adragna, F., Peltzer, G., Feigl, K., & Rabaute, T. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/364138a0 · Cited by 2,207
Self-citationNew version of the generic mapping tools
Wessel, P., & Smith, W. H. F. (1995) · Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union · doi:10.1029/95eo00198 · Cited by 2,180
New Version of the Generic Mapping Tools Released
Wessel, P. (1995) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,699
Radar Interferometry: Data Interpretation and Error Analysis
Hanssen, R. F. (2001) · Remote Sensing and Digital Image Processing · doi:10.1007/0-306-47633-9 · Cited by 1,589
Atmospheric Correction for the Troposphere and Stratosphere in Radio Ranging Satellites
Saastamoinen, J. (2013) · Geophysical Monograph Series · doi:10.1029/gm015p0247 · Cited by 1,492
Shuttle radar topography mission produces a wealth of data
Farr, T. G., & Kobrick, M. (2000) · Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union · doi:10.1029/eo081i048p00583 · Cited by 1,440
Metadata
- Authors
- Jolivet, R., Agram, P. S., Lin, N. Y., Simons, M., Doin, M., Peltzer, G., & Li, Z.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 2324-2341
- ISSN
- 2169-9313 (ISSN-L)
- 2169-9356
- OpenAlex
- W2144819091
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 27.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving InSAR geodesy using Global Atmospheric Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/2013jb010588
- The paper
- Jolivet, R., Agram, P. S., Lin, N. Y., Simons, M., Doin, M., Peltzer, G., & Li, Z. (2014). Improving InSAR geodesy using Global Atmospheric Models. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013jb010588
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.