Cited by 33Climate variability and modelsMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsAtmospheric aerosols and clouds

The robust dynamical contribution to precipitation extremes in idealized warming simulations across model resolutions

Lu, Jian, Ruby Leung, L., Yang, Qing, Chen, Gang, Collins, William D., Li, Fuyu, Jason Hou, Z., Feng, Xuelei·2014·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

The impact of the circulation shift under climate warming on the distribution of precipitation extremes and the associated sensitivity to model resolution are investigated using Community Atmosphere Model Version 3.0 in an aquaplanet configuration. The response of the probability density function of the precipitation to a uniform sea surface temperature warming can be interpreted as superimposition of a dynamically induced poleward shift and a thermodynamically induced upward shift toward higher intensities, which give rise to manyfold increase in the frequency of the most extreme categories of the precipitation events at the poleward side of the midlatitude storm track. Coarser resolutions underestimate not only the intensity of the precipitation extremes but also the dynamical contribution to the increase of precipitation extremes. Meanwhile, the thermodynamic contribution to the intensification of the precipitation extremes is substantially less than expected from the Clausius‐Clapeyron relation, implicative of significant change in the vertical structure of the precipitation processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2014gl059532

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A stronger dynamical contribution resembling a poleward shift has been found in idealized aquaplanet simulations.

    “A stronger dynamical contribution resembling a poleward shift has been found in idealized aquaplanet simulations [51, 62].”

    From Precipitation Extremes Under Climate Change (2015) · cites this paper as [51]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lu, J., Ruby Leung, L., Yang, Q., Chen, G., Collins, W. D., Li, F., Jason Hou, Z., & Feng, X.
Affiliations
  • Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US)
  • Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland Washington USA
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
  • George Mason University (US)
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2014-04-17
Volume
41
Issue
8
Pages
2971-2978
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W1484972652
Cited by
33
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory is operated for DOE by Battelle Memorial Institute (DE-AC05-76RL01830)
  • NSF (ATM-1064079)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Keywords
heavy rainfall, thermodynamic contribution, poleward shift, model resolution sensitivity, aquaplanet, midlatitude storm tracks, Clausius-Clapeyron equation, sea surface temperature warming, Community Atmosphere Model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review