Cited by 65Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsClimate variability and modelsCryospheric studies and observations

Observed and simulated changes in Antarctic sea ice extent over the past 50 years

Open access
Gagné, M.‐È., Gillett, N. P., Fyfe, J. C.·2015·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

Continuous monitoring of the polar regions by satellites has shown that sea ice extent (SIE) in the Antarctic has increased slightly since 1979. By contrast, climate model simulations including all major anthropogenic and natural climate influences simulate an average decrease in SIE since 1979. Here we take a longer view and assess the consistency of observed and simulated changes in Antarctic SIE using recently recovered satellite-based estimates of Antarctic SIE for September 1964 and May–July 1966, hence extending the current observational record from 35 to 50 years. While there is evidence of inconsistency between observed trends in Antarctic SIE and those simulated since 1979, particularly in models with realistic interannual variability, the observed trends since the mid-1960s fall within the 5–95% range of simulated trends. Thus, our results broadly support the hypothesis that the recent increase in Antarctic SIE is due to internal variability, though the reasons for the inconsistency in simulated and observed changes since 1979 remain to be determined.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2014gl062231

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Models of mass loss from the Antarctic ice-sheet are highly uncertain and models of the extent of Antarctic sea ice do not match reality well.

    “In particular, models of mass loss from the Antarctic ice-sheet are highly uncertain [449] and models of the extent of Antarctic sea ice do not match reality well [263].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [263]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gagné, M. ‐., Gillett, N. P., & Fyfe, J. C.
Affiliations
Environment and Climate Change Canada (CA)
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2015-01-08
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
90-95
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W1964414172
Cited by
65
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 5
FWCI
5.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada Visiting Fellowship Programme
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Cryospheric studies and observations
Keywords
Antarctic sea ice extent, sea ice trends, climate model simulation, satellite observations, natural climate variability, interannual variability, Antarctic climate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review