Cited by 81Atmospheric aerosols and cloudsAdvanced Aircraft Design and TechnologiesAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols

Aircraft soot indirect effect on large‐scale cirrus clouds: Is the indirect forcing by aircraft soot positive or negative?

Open access
Zhou, Cheng, Penner, Joyce E.·2014·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

Abstract The indirect effect of aircraft soot on cirrus clouds is subject to large uncertainties due to uncertainty in the effectiveness of aircraft soot acting as heterogeneous ice nuclei (IN) and the complexity caused by background ice nucleation, which introduces two major competing ice nucleation mechanisms: homogeneous freezing that generally produces more abundant ice particles and heterogeneous nucleation that generally produces fewer ice particles. In this paper, we used the coupled Community Atmosphere Model version 5.2 (CAM5)/IMPACT model to estimate the climate impacts of aircraft soot acting as IN in large‐scale cirrus clouds. We assume that only the aircraft soot particles that are preactivated in persistent contrail cirrus clouds are efficient IN. Further, we assume that these particles lose their ability to act as efficient IN when they become coated with three monolayers of sulfate. We varied the background number concentration of sulfate aerosols allowed to act as homogeneous ice nucleation sites as well as the dust concentrations that act as heterogeneous ice nuclei to examine the sensitivity of the forcing by aircraft soot to the background atmosphere. The global average effect can range from a high negative (cooling) rate, −0.35 W m−2, for the high sulfate/low dust case to a positive (warming) rate, +0.09 W m−2, for the low sulfate/low dust case (default CAM5 setup) when approximately 0.6% of total aviation soot acts as IN. The net negative forcing is caused by the addition of IN to a background atmosphere that is dominated by homogeneous nucleation (mainly in the tropic Indian Ocean, Central America, and North Atlantic Ocean). The forcings can be all positive, about +0.11 to +0.21 W m−2, when the background atmosphere is dominated by pure heterogeneous ice nucleation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2014jd021914

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increases in ice crystal numbers occur when the background atmosphere has much lower sulfate or haze-forming aerosol number concentrations and is dominated by heterogeneous freezing, causing forcings near zero or even positive.

    “In addition, increases in ice crystal numbers occur when the background atmosphere has much lower sulfate or haze-forming aerosol number concentrations and is dominated by heterogeneous freezing, causing forcings near zero or even positive (Zhou and Penner, 2014).”

    From The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018 (2021) · cites this paper as Zhou and Penner, 2014

  • The uncertainties center on difficulties in accurately simulating homogeneous and heterogeneous ice nucleation, variations in treatment of updraft velocities during cirrus formation, and lack of knowledge of the ice nucleating ability of aviation soot particles.

    “The un­ certainties center on the difficulties in accurately simulating homogeneous and heterogeneous ice nucleation in the background at­ mosphere, variations in the treatment of updraft velocities during cirrus formation, and the lack of knowledge of the ice nucleating (IN) ability of aviation soot particles during their atmospheric lifetime (Zhou and Penner, 2014; Penner et al., 2018).”

    From The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018 (2021) · cites this paper as Zhou and Penner, 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Adler, G., T. Koop, C. Haspel, I. Taraniuk, T. Moise, I. Koren, R. H. Heiblum, and Y. Rudich (2013), Formation of highly porous aerosol particles by atmospheric freeze-drying in ice clouds, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 110(51), 20,414-20,419.
  2. Barahona, D., and A. Nenes (2011), Dynamical states of low temperature cirrus, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3757-3771, doi:10.5194/acp-11-3757-2011. · DOI
  3. Chen, C.-C., A. Gettelman, C. Craig, P. Minnis, and D. P. Duda (2012), Global contrail coverage simulated by CAM5 with the inventory of 2006 global aircraft emissions, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 4, M04003, doi:10.1029/2011MS000105. · DOI
  4. Cziczo, D. J., K. D. Froyd, S. J. Gallavardin, O. Moehler, S. Benz, H. Saathoff, and D. M. Murphy (2009), Deactivation of ice nuclei due to atmospherically relevant surface coatings, Environ. Res. Lett., 4, 044013, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/044013. · DOI
  5. Cziczo, D. J., K. D. Froyd, C. Hoose, E. J. Jensen, M. Diao, M. A. Zondlo, J. B. Smith, C. H. Twohy, and D. M. Murphy (2013), Clarifying the dominant sources and mechanisms of cirrus cloud formation, Science, 340(6138), 1320-1324.
  6. Duda, D. P., P. Minnis, K. Khlopenkov, T. L. Chee, and R. Boeke (2013), Estimation of 2006 Northern Hemisphere contrail coverage using MODIS data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 612-617, doi:10.1002/grl.50097. · DOI
  7. Edwards, G. R., L. F. Evans, and A. F. Zipper (1970), Two-dimensional phase changes in water adsorbed on ice-nucleating substrates, Trans. Faraday Soc., 66, 220-234.
  8. Gettelman, A., and C. Chen (2013), The climate impact of aviation aerosols, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 2785-2789, doi:10.1002/grl.50520. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Gettelman, A., X. Liu, S. J. Ghan, H. Morrison, S. Park, A. J. Conley, S. A. Klein, J. Boyle, D. L. Mitchell, and J.-L. F. Li (2010), Global simulations of ice nucleation and ice supersaturation with an improved cloud scheme in the community atmosphere model, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D18216, doi:10.1029/2009JD013797. · DOI
  10. Gettelman, A., X. Liu, D. Barahona, U. Lohmann, and C. Chen (2012), Climate impacts of ice nucleation, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D20201, doi:10.1029/2012JD017950. · DOI
  11. Hendricks, J., B. Kärcher, U. Lohmann, and M. Ponater (2005), Do aircraft black carbon emissions affect cirrus clouds on the global scale?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L12814, doi:10.1029/2005GL022740. · DOI
  12. Hendricks, J., B. Kärcher, and U. Lohmann (2011), Effects of ice nuclei on cirrus clouds in a global climate model, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D18206, doi:10.1029/2010JD015302. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Jensen, E. J., et al. (2009), On the importance of small ice crystals in tropical anvil cirrus, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5519-5537, doi:10.5194/acp-9- 5519-2009. · DOI
  14. Jensen, E. J., L. Pfister, T.-P. Bui, P. Lawson, and D. Baumgardner (2010), Ice nucleation and cloud microphysical properties in tropical tropopause layer cirrus, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1369-1384, doi:10.5194/acp-10-1369-2010. · DOI
  15. Jensen, E. J., G. Diskin, R. P. Lawson, S. Lance, T. P. Bui, D. Hlavka, M. McGill, L. Pfister, O. B. Toon, and R. Gao (2013), Ice nucleation and dehydration in the Tropical Tropopause Layer, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 110, 2041-2046, doi:10.1073/pnas.1217104110. · DOI
  16. Kärcher, B., and J. Ström (2003), The roles of dynamical variability and aerosols in cirrus cloud formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 823-838, doi:10.5194/acp-3-823-2003. · DOI
  17. Krämer, M., et al. (2009), Ice supersaturations and cirrus cloud crystal numbers, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3505-3522, doi:10.5194/acp-9-3505-2009. · DOI
  18. Kuebbeler, M., U. Lohmann, J. Hendricks, and B. Kärcher (2014), Dust ice nuclei effects on cirrus clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 3027-3046, doi:10.5194/acp-14-3027-2014. · DOI
  19. Lee, D. S., D. W. Fahey, P. M. Forster, P. J. Newton, R. C. N. Wit, L. L. Lim, B. Owen, and R. Sausen (2009), Aviation and global climate change in the 21st century, Atmos. Env., 43, 3520-3537, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.04.024. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Liu, X., et al. (2012a), Towards a minimal representation of aerosol direct and indirect effects: Model description and evaluation, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 709-735, doi:10.5194/gmd-4-709-2012. · DOI
  21. Liu, X., X. Shi, K. Zhang, E. J. Jensen, A. Gettelman, D. Barahona, A. Nenes, and P. Lawson (2012b), Sensitivity studies of dust ice nuclei effect on cirrus clouds with the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 12,061-12,079, doi:10.5194/acp-12-12061-2012. · DOI
  22. Minnis, P., D. F. Young, D. P. Garber, L. Nguyen, W. L. Smith Jr., and R. Palikonda (1998), Transformation of contrails into cirrus during SUCCESS, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 1157-1160, doi:10.1029/97GL03314. · DOI
  23. Möhler, O., et al. (2006), Efficiency of the deposition mode ice nucleation on mineral dust particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6(10), 3007-3021.
  24. Möhler, O., et al. (2008), The effect of organic coating on the heterogeneous ice nucleation efficiency of mineral dust aerosols, Environ. Res. Lett., 3(2), 025007, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/3/2/025007. · DOI
  25. Penner, J. E., Y. Chen, M. Wang, and X. Liu (2009), Possible influence of anthropogenic aerosols on cirrus clouds and anthropogenic forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 879-896, doi:10.5194/acp-9-879-2009. · DOI
  26. Rogers, D. C., P. J. DeMott, S. M. Kreidenweis, and Y. Chen (1998), Measurements of ice nucleating aerosols during SUCCESS, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 1383-1386, doi:10.1029/97GL03478. · DOI
  27. Schumann, U., and K. Graf (2013), Aviation-induced cirrus and radiation changes at diurnal timescales, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 118, 2404-2421, doi:10.1002/jgrd.50184. · DOI
  28. Spangenberg, D. A., P. Minnis, S. T. Bedka, R. Palikonda, D. P. Duda, and F. G. Rose (2013), Contrail radiative forcing over the Northern Hemisphere from 2006 Aqua MODIS data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 595-600, doi:10.1002/grl.50168. · DOI
  29. Spichtinger, P., and M. Krämer (2012), Tropical tropopause ice clouds: A dynamic approach to the mystery of low crystal numbers, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 12, 28,109-28,153, doi:10.5194/acpd-12-28109-2012. · DOI
  30. Wagner, R., O. Möhler, H. Saathoff, M. Schnaiter, J. Skrotzki, T. Leisner, T. W. Wilson, T. L. Malkin, and B. J. Murray (2012), Ice cloud processing of ultra-viscous/glassy aerosol particles leads to enhanced ice nucleation ability, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 8589-8610, doi:10.5194/ acp-12-8589-2012. · DOI
  31. Welti, A., F. Lüönd, O. Stetzer, and U. Lohmann (2009), Influence of particle size on the ice nucleating ability of mineral dusts, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9(18), 6705-6715, doi:10.5194/acp-9-6705-2009. · DOI
  32. Yi, B., P. Yang, K.-N. Liou, P. Minnis, and J. E. Penner (2012), Simulation of the global contrail radiative forcing: A sensitivity analysis, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L00F03, doi:10.1029/2012GL054042. · DOI
  33. Zhang, K., X. Liu, M. Wang, J. M. Comstock, D. L. Mitchell, S. Mishra, and G. G. Mace (2013), Evaluating and constraining ice cloud parame- terizations in CAM5 using aircraft measurements from the SPARTICUS campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4963-4982, doi:10.5194/ acp-13-4963-2013. · DOI
  34. Zhou, C., J. E. Penner, Y. Ming, and X. L. Huang (2012), Aerosol forcing based on CAM5 and AM3 meteorological fields, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9629-9652, doi:10.5194/acp-12-9629-2012. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, C., & Penner, J. E.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Zhou, Cheng
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2014-10
Volume
119
Issue
19
ISSN
  • 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
  • 2169-897X
  • 2169-8996
OpenAlex
W1545716867
Cited by
81
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
7.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NSF (AGS-0946739)
  • Department of Transportation's Aviation Climate Change Research Initiative (DTRT57-10-C-10011)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Keywords
indirect effects, cirrus clouds, ice nucleation, homogeneous freezing, contrail cirrus, dust aerosols, radiative forcing, aviation climate impact

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review