Cited by 76Oceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesClimate variability and modelsMarine and coastal ecosystems

Interannual variability in the S outh‐E ast A tlantic O cean, focusing on the B enguela U pwelling S ystem: Remote versus local forcing

Open access
Bachèlery, Marie‐Lou, Illig, Serena, Dadou, Isabelle·2016·Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

Abstract

We investigate the respective roles of equatorial remote (Equatorial Kelvin Waves) and local atmospheric (wind, heat fluxes) forcing on coastal variability in the South‐East Atlantic Ocean extending up to the Benguela Upwelling System (BUS) over the 2000–2008 period. We carried out a set of six numerical experiments based on a regional ocean model, that differ only by the prescribed forcing (climatological or total) at surface and lateral boundaries. Results show that at subseasonal timescales (<100 days), the coastal oceanic variability (currents, thermocline, and sea level) is mainly driven by local forcing, while at interannual timescales it is dominated by remote equatorial forcing. At interannual timescales (13–20 months), remotely forced Coastal‐Trapped Waves (CTW) propagate poleward along the African southwest coast up to the northern part of the BUS at 24°S, with phase speeds ranging from 0.8 to 1.1 m.s−1. We show that two triggering mechanisms limit the southward propagation of CTW: interannual variability of the equatorward Benguela Current prescribed at the model's southern boundary (30°S) and variability of local atmospheric forcing that modulates the magnitude of observed coastal interannual events. When local wind stress forcing is in (out) of phase, the magnitude of the interannual event increases (decreases). Finally, dynamical processes associated with CTW propagations are further investigated using heat budget for two intense interannual events in 2001 and 2…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2015jc011168

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bachèlery, M., Illig, S., & Dadou, I.
Affiliations
  • Laboratoire d’Études en Géophysique et Océanographie Spatiales (FR)
  • Laboratoire d'Etudes en Géophysique et Océanographie Spatiales; OMP/LEGOS Toulouse France
Corresponding author
Bachèlery, Marie‐Lou
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Published
2016-01
Volume
121
Issue
1
Pages
284-310
ISSN
  • 2169-9275 (ISSN-L)
  • 2169-9291
OpenAlex
W2287100320
Cited by
76
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3
FWCI
4.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  • the Région Midi-Pyrénées is acknowledged for preliminary results of this work
  • CALMIP (2013-2014-P1134)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
Keywords
interannual variability, Benguela upwelling, coastal trapped waves, equatorial Kelvin waves, remote forcing, wind stress, heat flux, subseasonal variability, wave propagation, heat balance, subsurface temperature anomalies, advection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review