The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A high-resolution global flood hazard model
Open accessAbstract
Floods are a natural hazard that affect communities worldwide, but to date the vast majority of flood hazard research and mapping has been undertaken by wealthy developed nations. As populations and economies have grown across the developing world, so too has demand from governments, businesses, and NGOs for modeled flood hazard data in these data-scarce regions. We identify six key challenges faced when developing a flood hazard model that can be applied globally and present a framework methodology that leverages recent cross-disciplinary advances to tackle each challenge. The model produces return period flood hazard maps at ∼90 m resolution for the whole terrestrial land surface between 56°S and 60°N, and results are validated against high-resolution government flood hazard data sets from the UK and Canada. The global model is shown to capture between two thirds and three quarters of the area determined to be at risk in the benchmark data without generating excessive false positive predictions. When aggregated to ∼1 km, mean absolute error in flooded fraction falls to ∼5%. The full complexity global model contains an automatically parameterized subgrid channel network, and comparison to both a simplified 2-D only variant and an independently developed pan-European model shows the explicit inclusion of channels to be a critical contributor to improved model performance. While careful processing of existing global terrain data sets enables reasonable model performance in urban areas, adoption of forthcoming next-generation global terrain data sets will offer the best prospect for a step-change improvement in model performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated
Kottek, M., Grieser, J., Beck, C., Rudolf, B., & Rubel, F. (2006) · Meteorologische Zeitschrift · doi:10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130 · Cited by 11,456
Future flood losses in major coastal cities
Hallegatte, S., Green, C., Nicholls, R. J., & Corfee-Morlot, J. (2013) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1979 · Cited by 2,503
New Global Hydrography Derived from Spaceborne Elevation Data
Lehner, B., Verdin, K., & Jarvis, A. (2008) · Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union · doi:10.1029/2008eo100001 · Cited by 2,411
Hirt, C., Filmer, M. S., & Featherstone, W. E. (2010) · Australian Journal of Earth Sciences · doi:10.1080/08120091003677553 · Cited by 298
Cited by
A High-Accuracy Map of Global Terrain Elevations
Yamazaki, D., Ikeshima, D., Tawatari, R., Yamaguchi, T., O'Loughlin, F., Neal, J. C., Sampson, C. C., Kanae, S., & Bates, P. D. (2017) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1002/2017gl072874 · Cited by 1,326
Self-citationA 30 m global map of elevation with forests and buildings removed
Hawker, L., Uhe, P., Paulo, L., Sosa, J., Savage, J., Sampson, C., & Neal, J. (2022) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac4d4f · Cited by 668
Self-citationEnsemble flood risk assessment in Europe under high end climate scenarios
Alfieri, L., Feyen, L., Dottori, F., & Bianchi, A. (2015) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.004 · Cited by 346
Self-citationDas, S. (2018) · Arabian Journal of Geosciences · doi:10.1007/s12517-018-3933-4 · Cited by 203
Accuracy Assessment of the TanDEM-X 90 Digital Elevation Model for Selected Floodplain Sites
Hawker, L., Neal, J., & Bates, P. (2019) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2019.111319 · Cited by 151
Self-citationAccuracy Assessment of the Global TanDEM-X Digital Elevation Model in a Mountain Environment
Gdulová, K., Marešová, J., & Moudrý, V. (2020) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2020.111724 · Cited by 64
Infrastructure Resilience for Climate Adaptation
Gupta, A., Robinson, C., & Dilkina, B. (2018) · Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies · doi:10.1145/3209811.3209859 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Sampson, C. C., Smith, A. M., Bates, P. D., Neal, J. C., Alfieri, L., & Freer, J. E.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 7358-7381
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111456289
- Cited by
- 625
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 28.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.