Cited by 1,326

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A High-Accuracy Map of Global Terrain Elevations

Yamazaki, Dai, Ikeshima, Daiki, Tawatari, Ryunosuke, Yamaguchi, Tomohiro, O'Loughlin, Fiachra, Neal, Jeffery C., Sampson, Christopher C., Kanae, Shinjiro, Bates, Paul D.·2017·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

Spaceborne digital elevation models (DEMs) are a fundamental input for many geoscience studies, but they still include nonnegligible height errors. Here we introduce a high‐accuracy global DEM at 3″ resolution (~90 m at the equator) by eliminating major error components from existing DEMs. We separated absolute bias, stripe noise, speckle noise, and tree height bias using multiple satellite data sets and filtering techniques. After the error removal, land areas mapped with ±2 m or better vertical accuracy were increased from 39% to 58%. Significant improvements were found in flat regions where height errors larger than topography variability, and landscapes such as river networks and hill‐valley structures, became clearly represented. We found the topography slope of previous DEMs was largely distorted in most of world major floodplains (e.g., Ganges, Nile, Niger, and Mekong) and swamp forests (e.g., Amazon, Congo, and Vasyugan). The newly developed DEM will enhance many geoscience applications which are terrain dependent.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2017gl072874

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To correct the effect of vegetation on most pixels, the adopted solution is to develop an empirical model that relates vegetation height, or the magnitude of the error vegetation causes in DEMs, to the correction.

    “To correct the effect of vegetation on most pixels, the solution that has been adopted is to develop an empirical model that relates the height of the vegetation, or more precisely, the magnitude of the error that the vegetation causes in DEMs [22][23][24].”

    From ANADEM: A Digital Terrain Model for South America (2024) · cites this paper as [23]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 10.1002/wrcr.20412 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/978-3-642-10634-7_30 · DOI
  3. 10.14358/PERS.72.3.287 · DOI
  4. 10.1029/2002GB001917 · DOI
  5. Crippen R. et al. (2016) NASADEM global elevation model: Methods and progress ISPRS‐International Archives of the Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XLI‐B4 125–128 doi:10.5194/isprs‐archives‐XLI‐B4‐125‐2016. · DOI
  6. Danielson J. J. andD. B.Gesch(2011) Global multi‐resolution terrain elevation data 2010 (GMTED2010) U.S. Geol. Surv. Open File Rep. 2011–1073 26 p. · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.08.014 · DOI
  8. DiMiceli C. M., 2011, Annual Global Automated MODIS Vegetation Continuous Fields (MOD44B) at 250 m Spatial Resolution for Data Years Beginning Day 65, 2000–2010, Collection 5 Percent Tree Cover
  9. 10.1029/2005RG000183 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/j.rse.2014.10.015 · DOI
  11. 10.1029/2005GL023423 · DOI
  12. Gallant J., 2011, Adaptive smoothing for noisy DEMs, Proc. Geomorphometry, 33, 7
  13. Gallant J., 2009, Enhancing the SRTM data for Australia, Proc. Geomorphometry, 31, 149
  14. Gesch D. B. M. J.Oimoen andG. A.Evans(2014) Accuracy assessment of the US Geological Survey National Elevation Dataset and comparison with other large‐area elevation datasets: SRTM and ASTER U.S. Geol. Surv. Open File Rep. 2014–1008 10 doi:10.3133/ofr20141008. · DOI
  15. 10.1029/2005GL023471 · DOI
  16. 10.1080/08120091003677553 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1038/ngeo988 · DOI
  18. 10.14358/PERS.69.10.1169 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.09.028 · DOI
  20. 10.1109/TGRS.2007.900693 · DOI
  21. 10.1007/s10021‐011‐9452‐8 · DOI
  22. 10.1029/2005GL023800 · DOI
  23. 10.1126/science.aaf7891 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.rse.2016.04.018 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1002/2015WR018237 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/416617a · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.11.002 · DOI
  28. 10.14358/PERS.72.3.249 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1002/2013WR014091 · DOI
  30. 10.1002/2015WR016954 · DOI
  31. 10.3389/feart.2015.00085 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/507169e · DOI
  33. 10.1029/2011JG001708 · DOI
  34. Tachikawa T. M.Hato M.Kaku andA.Iwasaki(2011) Characteristics of ASTER GDEM version 2 Proceeding of 2011 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) 3657–3660 doi:10.1109/IGARSS.2011.6050017. · DOI
  35. Tadono T. J.Takaku K.Tsutsui F.Oda andH.Nagai(2015) Status of “ALOS World 3D (AW3D)” global DSM generation Proceeding 2015 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) 3822–3825 doi:10.1109/IGARSS.2015.7326657. · DOI
  36. Takaku J. T.Tadono K.Tsutsui andM.Ichikawa(2015) Quality status of high resolution global DSM generated from ALOS PRISM Proceeding of 2015 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) 3854–3857 doi:10.1109/IGARSS.2015.7326665. · DOI
  37. Takaku J. A.Iwasaki andT.Tadono(2016) Adaptive filter for improving quality of ALOS PRISM DSM Proceeding of IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) 2016 5370–5373 doi:10.1109/IGARSS.2016.7730399. · DOI
  38. 10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943‐5460.0000357 · DOI
  39. Tarekegn T. H., 2013, Correction of SRTM DEM artefacts by Fourier transform for flood inundation modeling, J. Jpn Soc. Civ. Eng. B1, 69, 193
  40. 10.1038/nclimate2742 · DOI
  41. 10.1002/2014GL059744 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.rse.2015.10.014 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yamazaki, D., Ikeshima, D., Tawatari, R., Yamaguchi, T., O'Loughlin, F., Neal, J. C., Sampson, C. C., Kanae, S., & Bates, P. D.
Affiliations
  • Department of Integrated Climate Change Projection Research Japan Agency for Marine‐Earth Science and Technology Yokohama Japan
  • Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Tokyo Institute of Technology Tokyo Japan
  • Institute of Space and Astronautical Science Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency Sagamihara Japan
  • UCD School of Civil Engineering University College Dublin Dublin Ireland
  • School of Geographical Sciences University of Bristol Bristol UK
  • SSBN Bristol UK
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2017-06-14
Volume
44
Issue
11
Pages
5844-5853
ISSN
  • 0094-8276
  • 1944-8007
Cited by
1,326
References
2
Language
en
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (16H06101, 16H06291)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review