The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Origin of the Moon Within a Terrestrial Synestia
Open accessAbstract
The giant impact hypothesis remains the leading theory for lunar origin. However, current models struggle to explain the Moon's composition and isotopic similarity with Earth. Here we present a new lunar origin model. High‐energy, high‐angular‐momentum giant impacts can create a post‐impact structure that exceeds the corotation limit, which defines the hottest thermal state and angular momentum possible for a corotating body. In a typical super‐corotation‐limit body, traditional definitions of mantle, atmosphere, and disk are not appropriate, and the body forms a new type of planetary structure, named a synestia. Using simulations of cooling synestias combined with dynamic, thermodynamic, and geochemical calculations, we show that satellite formation from a synestia can produce the main features of our Moon. We find that cooling drives mixing of the structure, and condensation generates moonlets that orbit within the synestia, surrounded by tens of bars of bulk silicate Earth vapor. The moonlets and growing moon are heated by the vapor until the first major element (Si) begins to vaporize and buffer the temperature. Moonlets equilibrate with bulk silicate Earth vapor at the temperature of silicate vaporization and the pressure of the structure, establishing the lunar isotopic composition and pattern of moderately volatile elements. Eventually, the cooling synestia recedes within the lunar orbit, terminating the main stage of lunar accretion. Our model shifts the paradigm for lunar origin from specifying a certain impact scenario to achieving a Moon‐forming synestia. Giant impacts that produce potential Moon‐forming synestias were common at the end of terrestrial planet formation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“High angular momentum impacts into rapidly spinning targets (Ćuk & Stewart 2012;Lock et al. 2018) can eject and mix more proto-Earth material, as can a very large impactor (Canup 2012).”
From Immediate Origin of the Moon as a Post-impact Satellite (2022) · cites this paper as Lock et al. 2018
In the citing paper
“The total angular momentum is increased above the canonical ∼1.2 L EM to ∼2.7 and ∼1.9, respectively, comparable to other high angular momentum impact scenarios (Canup 2012;Ćuk & Stewart 2012;Lock et al. 2018), though any intermediate values should also be viable in this case.”
From Immediate Origin of the Moon as a Post-impact Satellite (2022) · cites this paper as Lock et al. 2018
In the citing paper
“Additionally, larger disks might produce other moonlets (Rufu et al. 2017;Citron et al. 2018b), and satellites may accrete significant additional material from the debris disk (Salmon & Canup 2012;Lock et al. 2018).”
From Immediate Origin of the Moon as a Post-impact Satellite (2022) · cites this paper as Lock et al. 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A low mass for Mars from Jupiter’s early gas-driven migration
Walsh, K. J., Morbidelli, A., Raymond, S. N., O'Brien, D. P., & Mandell, A. M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10201 · Cited by 1,241
Origin of the Moon in a giant impact near the end of the Earth's formation
Canup, R. M., & Asphaug, E. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35089010 · Cited by 1,094 · cited 11×
“Numerical simulations of giant impacts predict that the canonical lunar disk is derived primarily from the impactor (Canup and Asphaug, 2001; Canup, 2004, 2008a).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSimulations of a late lunar-forming impact
Canup, R. M. (2004) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2003.09.028 · Cited by 669
Forming a Moon with an Earth-like composition via a giant impact
Canup, R. M. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1226073 · Cited by 656
The isotopic nature of the Earth’s accreting material through time
Dauphas, N. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature20830 · Cited by 450
Equilibration in the aftermath of the lunar-forming giant impact
Pahlevan, K., & Stevenson, D. J. (2007) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2007.07.055 · Cited by 381
FORMATION OF THE TERRESTRIAL PLANETS FROM A NARROW ANNULUS
Hansen, B. M. S. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/703/1/1131 · Cited by 317
Melting and mixing states of the Earth’s mantle after the Moon-forming impact
Nakajima, M., & Stevenson, D. J. (2015) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2015.06.023 · Cited by 215
Lunar-forming collisions with pre-impact rotation
CANUP, R. (2008) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2008.03.011 · Cited by 157
The deep wind structure of the giant planets: Results from an anelastic general circulation model
Kaspi, Y., Flierl, G. R., & Showman, A. P. (2009) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2009.03.026 · Cited by 149
Cited by
Immediate Origin of the Moon as a Post-impact Satellite
Kegerreis, J. A., Ruiz-Bonilla, S., Eke, V. R., Massey, R. J., Sandnes, T. D., & Teodoro, L. F. A. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac8d96 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Lock, S. J., Stewart, S. T., Petaev, M. I., Leinhardt, Z., Mace, M. T., Jacobsen, S. B., & Cuk, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 910-951
- ISSN
- 2169-9097 (ISSN-L)
- 2169-9100
- OpenAlex
- W2787972555
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 19.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Origin of the Moon Within a Terrestrial Synestia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/2017je005333
- The paper
- Lock, S. J., Stewart, S. T., Petaev, M. I., Leinhardt, Z., Mace, M. T., Jacobsen, S. B., & Cuk, M. (2018). The Origin of the Moon Within a Terrestrial Synestia. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017je005333
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.