Cited by 1,241Astro and Planetary ScienceAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesPlanetary Science and Exploration

A low mass for Mars from Jupiter’s early gas-driven migration

Open access
Walsh, Kevin J., Morbidelli, Alessandro, Raymond, Sean N., O'Brien, David P., Mandell, Avi M.·2011·Nature

Abstract

Jupiter and Saturn formed in a few million years (ref. 1) from a gas-dominated protoplanetary disk, and were susceptible to gas-driven migration of their orbits on timescales of only ∼100,000 years (ref. 2). Hydrodynamic simulations show that these giant planets can undergo a two-stage, inward-then-outward, migration. The terrestrial planets finished accreting much later, and their characteristics, including Mars' small mass, are best reproduced by starting from a planetesimal disk with an outer edge at about one astronomical unit from the Sun (1 au is the Earth-Sun distance). Here we report simulations of the early Solar System that show how the inward migration of Jupiter to 1.5 au, and its subsequent outward migration, lead to a planetesimal disk truncated at 1 au; the terrestrial planets then form from this disk over the next 30-50 million years, with an Earth/Mars mass ratio consistent with observations. Scattering by Jupiter initially empties but then repopulates the asteroid belt, with inner-belt bodies originating between 1 and 3 au and outer-belt bodies originating between and beyond the giant planets. This explains the significant compositional differences across the asteroid belt. The key aspect missing from previous models of terrestrial planet formation is the substantial radial migration of the giant planets, which suggests that their behaviour is more similar to that inferred for extrasolar planets than previously thought.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature10201

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Current thinking suggests Mars is best understood as a planetary embryo, whose development into a fully fledged terrestrial planet was arrested by some process such as instability in the configuration of the outer planets.

    “Current thinking suggests Mars is best understood as a planetary embryo, whose development into a fully fledged terrestrial planet was arrested by some process such as instability in the configuration of the outer planets (Walsh et al. 2011).”

    From The Climate of Early Mars (2016) · cites this paper as Walsh et al. 2011

  • Two dominant models have emerged under the planetary accretion paradigm to explain the formation of planets and long-term evolution of the Solar System: the Grand Tack model and the Nice model.

    “Two dominant models have emerged under the planetary accretion paradigm to explain the formation of planets and long-term evolution of the Solar System: the Grand Tack model, which focuses on planet formation (Walsh et al., 2011), and the Nice model, which focuses on long-term evolution (Gomes et al., 2005; Morbidelli et al., 2005; Tsiganis et al., 2005; Levison et al., 2011).”

    From The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 (2016) · cites this paper as Walsh et al., 2011

  • Under the Grand Tack model, Jupiter and subsequently Saturn began their formation considerably closer to the Sun than they are now (approximately 3.5 AU).

    “Under this model, Jupiter and subsequently Saturn began their formation considerably closer to the Sun than they are now (approximately 3.5 AU; Walsh et al., 2011).”

    From The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 (2016) · cites this paper as Walsh et al., 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walsh, K. J., Morbidelli, A., Raymond, S. N., O'Brien, D. P., & Mandell, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Planetary Science Institute (US)
  • Goddard Space Flight Center (US)
Corresponding author
Walsh, Kevin J.
Venue
Nature
Published
2011-06-05
Volume
475
Issue
7355
Pages
206-209
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2079958881
Cited by
1,241
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 100 · 2018: 112 · 2017: 99 · 2016: 96 · 2015: 99 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 57
FWCI
37.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Oskar-Bordeaux (Universite de Bordeaux) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
Keywords
terrestrial planet formation, early solar system, protoplanetary disks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review