Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 630

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 407 of the 407 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Methane Feedbacks to the Global Climate System in a Warmer World

Open access
Dean, Joshua F., Middelburg, Jack J., Röckmann, Thomas, Aerts, Rien, Blauw, Luke G., Egger, Matthias, Jetten, Mike S. M., de Jong, Anniek E. E., Meisel, Ove H., Rasigraf, Olivia, Slomp, Caroline P., in't Zandt, Michiel H., Dolman, A. J.·2018·Reviews of Geophysics

Abstract

Methane (CH 4) is produced in many natural systems that are vulnerable to change under a warming climate, yet current CH 4 budgets, as well as future shifts in CH 4 emissions, have high uncertainties. Climate change has the potential to increase CH 4 emissions from critical systems such as wetlands, marine and freshwater systems, permafrost, and methane hydrates, through shifts in temperature, hydrology, vegetation, landscape disturbance, and sea level rise. Increased CH 4 emissions from these systems would in turn induce further climate change, resulting in a positive climate feedback. Here we synthesize biological, geochemical, and physically focused CH 4 climate feedback literature, bringing together the key findings of these disciplines. We discuss environment‐specific feedback processes, including the microbial, physical, and geochemical interlinkages and the timescales on which they operate, and present the current state of knowledge of CH 4 climate feedbacks in the immediate and distant future. The important linkages between microbial activity and climate warming are discussed with the aim to better constrain the sensitivity of the CH 4 cycle to future climate predictions. We determine that wetlands will form the majority of the CH 4 climate feedback up to 2100. Beyond this timescale, CH 4 emissions from marine and freshwater systems and permafrost environments could become more important. Significant CH 4 emissions to the atmosphere from the dissociation of methane hydrates are not expected in the near future. Our key findings highlight the importance of quantifying whether CH 4 consumption can counterbalance CH 4 production under future climate scenarios.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2017rg000559

Cites

407 of 407 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 407 references

Cited by

See all 630

Metadata

Authors
Dean, J. F., Middelburg, J. J., Röckmann, T., Aerts, R., Blauw, L. G., Egger, M., Jetten, M. S. M., de Jong, A. E. E., Meisel, O. H., Rasigraf, O., Slomp, C. P., in't Zandt, M. H., & Dolman, A. J.
Venue
Reviews of Geophysics
Published
2018-03
Volume
56
Issue
1
Pages
207-250
ISSN
  • 0096-1043 (ISSN-L)
  • 8755-1209
  • 1944-9208
OpenAlex
W2790444922
Cited by
630
References
407
FWCI
26.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methane Feedbacks to the Global Climate System in a Warmer World. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/2017rg000559
The paper
Dean, J. F., Middelburg, J. J., Röckmann, T., Aerts, R., Blauw, L. G., Egger, M., Jetten, M. S. M., de Jong, A. E. E., Meisel, O. H., Rasigraf, O., Slomp, C. P., in't Zandt, M. H., & Dolman, A. J. (2018). Methane Feedbacks to the Global Climate System in a Warmer World. Reviews of Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017rg000559

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.