The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Human–Computer Interaction
Abstract
Human–computer interaction (HCI) is a discipline concerned with the design, evaluation, and implementation of interactive computing systems for human use. The field formally emerged out of computer science, cognitive psychology, and industrial design through the 1960s, formulating guidelines for the development of interactive computer systems, highlighting usability concerns, and providing the impetus for improved interfaces. Computing devices are becoming more prevalent and integrated into both our social and work spaces, and in some cases, they are already essential elements of these environments. HCI therefore plays an increasingly important role in ensuring that computer systems are not only functional but also respect the needs and capabilities of the humans that use them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
The Computer for the 21st Century
Weiser, M. (1991) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0991-94 · Cited by 10,017
Picard, R. W. (1997) · MIT Press · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1140.001.0001 · Cited by 7,382
The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement.
Fitts, P. M. (1954) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0055392 · Cited by 6,466
Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250951 · Cited by 4,726
Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse
Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872097778543886 · Cited by 4,554
Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces
Dourish, P., & Bellotti, V. (1992) · Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work - CSCW '92 · doi:10.1145/143457.143468 · Cited by 2,550
Bainbridge, L. (1983) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/0005-1098(83)90046-8 · Cited by 2,205
Affordance, conventions, and design
Norman, D. A. (1999) · Interactions · doi:10.1145/301153.301168 · Cited by 2,040
Cited by
Multimodal human–computer interaction: A survey
Jaimes, A., & Sebe, N. (2007) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2006.10.019 · Cited by 965
Yates, D., & Paquette, S. (2011) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.10.001 · Cited by 874
Risius, M., & Spohrer, K. (2017) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-017-0506-0 · Cited by 803
A user-centered model for designing consumer mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps)
Schnall, R., Rojas, M., Bakken, S., Brown, W., Carballo-Dieguez, A., Carry, M., Gelaude, D., Mosley, J. P., & Travers, J. (2016) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2016.02.002 · Cited by 583
Methods of usability testing in the development of eHealth applications: A scoping review
Maramba, I., Chatterjee, A., & Newman, C. (2019) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.03.018 · Cited by 602
Metadata
- Authors
- Cooperstock, J. R.
- Venue
- Wiley Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Engineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-03-16
- Pages
- 1529-1542
- OpenAlex
- W2750641468
- Cited by
- 802
- References
- 13
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human–Computer Interaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/9780470050118.ecse524
- The paper
- Cooperstock, J. R. (2009). Human–Computer Interaction. Wiley Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470050118.ecse524
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
