The DOI matches its Crossref record.
International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2008
Abstract
Now in its 23rd year, the International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology has attracted contributions from leading researchers and produced many citation classics. Each volume is a state-of-the-art overview of topics spanning the full spectrum of I/O psychology and 2008 is no exception. Areas covered include leadership development, the psychology of careers, employee recruitment, health promotion in the workplace, and politics at work. Each chapter is supported by a valuable bibliography. For advanced students, academics, researchers and professionals this remains the most current and authoritative guide to new developments and established knowledge in the field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
TETT, R. P., & MEYER, J. P. (1993) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00874.x · Cited by 4,114
Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda.
van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008 · Cited by 2,911
Common methods bias: does common methods variance really bias results?
Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H. (1998) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/109442819814002 · Cited by 1,380
Recovery from job stress: The stressor-detachment model as an integrative framework
Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2015) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.1924 · Cited by 1,307
D'amour, D., & Oandasan, I. (2005) · Journal of Interprofessional Care · doi:10.1080/13561820500081604 · Cited by 1,017
Metadata
- Venue
- Wiley eBooks
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-01-11
- OpenAlex
- W2501142672
- Cited by
- 613
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 49.83
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2008. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/9780470773277
- The paper
- International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2008. (2008). Wiley eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470773277
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.