Cited by 41Educational Strategies and EpistemologiesEpistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsEducational Theory and Curriculum Studies

Knowledge, Truth, and Learning

Adler, Jonathan E.·2003·A Companion to the Philosophy of Education

Abstract

This chapter contains sections titled: Epistemological Background Educational Applications On Not Addressing Epistemological Controversies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9780470996454.ch21

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Incorporating the CT approach into the IV approach would establish that critical thinking is the central thing that teachers can teach for and make it their primary obligation to teach this.

    “Incorporating the CT approach into the IV approach would, again, establish that critical thinking is the central thing that teachers can teach for and so make it their primary obligation to teach this. 35”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adler, J. E.
Corresponding author
Adler, Jonathan E.
Venue
A Companion to the Philosophy of Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-01
Pages
285-304
OpenAlex
W1556393212
Cited by
41
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
Keywords
epistemology, knowledge, truth, learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review