Elusive Knowledge
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Contextualism in the theory of knowledge embraces the result that knowledge attributions vary with the attributor.
“Contextualism (see Cohn 1986Cohn , 1988Cohn , 1999;;DeRose 1995;Feldman 1999;Heller 1999;Lewis 1996) in the theory of knowledge is a view that embraces this result.”
From EPISTEMOLOGY AND INFORMATION (2008) · cites this paper as Lewis 1996
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pritchard, D. (2005) · doi:10.1093/019928038x.001.0001 · Cited by 874 · see citing works
Pritchard, D. (2007) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-006-9039-7 · Cited by 408 · see citing works
Knowledge, Truth, and Learning
Adler, J. E. (2003) · A Companion to the Philosophy of Education · doi:10.1002/9780470996454.ch21 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Dretske, F. (2008) · Philosophy of Information · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-51726-5.50007-8 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lewis, D.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lewis, David
- ORCID
- Lewis, David
- Venue
- Australasian Journal of Philosophy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-12
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 549-567
- ISSN
- 0004-8402 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-6828
- OpenAlex
- W4250582129
- Cited by
- 1,450
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 73 · 2025: 97 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 89 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 30.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Australasian Journal of Philosophy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy, Science, and History
- Keywords
- knowledge, epistemology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
