Cited by 57Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsAcademic Writing and Publishingscientometrics and bibliometrics research

Statistical Analyses and Methods in the Published Literature: The SAMPL Guidelines*

Lang, Thomas A., Altman, Douglas G.·2014·Guidelines for Reporting Health Research: A User's Manual

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9781118715598.ch25

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Lang, T. A., & Altman, D. G.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Guidelines for Reporting Health Research: A User's Manual
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-07-25
Pages
264-274
OpenAlex
W1592010138
Cited by
57
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Keywords
statistical methods reporting, reproducibility, statistical reporting quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review