Social Aspects of Memory
Abstract
No one doubts that memories are shaped by the social context in which they are formed or later remembered. In this essay we focus on how the social context of remembering and memorizing with others shapes the way both the speaker and listener remember the past, what we refer to as collaborative remembering. In addressing the mnemonic consequences of collaborative remembering, we discuss 1) how it shapes what is occurrently remembered in the group and 2) how it affects both what the speaker and listener subsequently remember. In terms of the former, we discuss the robust collaborative inhibition literature; in terms of the latter, we discuss the social contagion, retrieval induced‐forgetting and socially shared retrieval‐induced forgetting literature. In conclusion, we highlight areas in need of future research within the area of “social aspects of memory”: 1) whether the mnemonic effects of collaborative remember propagate across a group, that is, to move beyond dyadic interactions and examine larger groups; 2) examining the evolutionary advantages of human memory being susceptible to the influence of others; and, in turn, 3) how this mnemonic susceptibility may help foster social bonds.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individuals are embedded in a memory ecology, in which they are never really separated from their social and inanimate environment.
“individuals are embedded in a memory ecology (Hoskins, 2016; see also Stone & Zwolinski, 2022), in which they are never really separated from their social and inanimate environment (cf.Hirst & Stone, 2015).”
From Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model (2024) · cites this paper as Hirst & Stone, 2015
Cites
Hastorf, A. H., & Cantril, H. (1954) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0057880 · Cited by 882 · see citing works
I belong, therefore, I exist: ingroup identification, ingroup entitativity, and ingroup bias.
Castano, E., Yzerbyt, V., Paladino, M.-P., & Sacchi, S. (2002) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167202282001 · Cited by 493 · see citing works
Towards a psychology of collective memory
Hirst, W., & Manier, D. (2008) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658210701811912 · Cited by 443 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model
Hutmacher, F., Appel, M., & Schwan, S. (2024) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2024.2384125 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hirst, W., & Stone, C. B.
- Affiliations
- The New School (US)
- John Jay College of Criminal Justice (US)
- Venue
- Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-05-15
- Pages
- 1-12
- OpenAlex
- W1557328217
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Wiley eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
- Keywords
- collaborative remembering, social memory, collaborative inhibition, social contagion, retrieval-induced forgetting, shared memory, group memory, social bonds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review