Cited by 890Sport Psychology and PerformancePsychology and Mental HealthPhysical education and sports games research

They saw a game: A case study

Hastorf, Albert H., Cantril, Hadley·1954·The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0057880

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Princeton-Dartmouth football study, Princeton students saw Dartmouth commit twice as many flagrant penalties and three times as many mild penalties as their own team, while Dartmouth students recorded approximately equal penalties by both teams.

    “Princeton students saw the Dartmouth team commit twice as many flagrant penalties and three times as many mild penalties as their own team.Dartmouth students, on the other hand, recorded an approximately equal number of penalties by both teams.”

    From Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases (1997) · cites this paper as Hastorf and Cantril (1954)

  • The self-serving bias affects individuals' evaluations of groups they are affiliated with.

    “The self-serving bias affects not only individuals' evaluations of themselves, but also of groups they are affiliated with.”

    From Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases (1997) · cites this paper as Hastorf and Cantril (1954)

  • In the Cohen et al. (2000) third study, participants who did not receive self-affirmation judged the activist who shared their convictions more favorably than the activist who did not.

    “Participants who did not receive a self-aYrmation judged the activist who shared their convictions more favorably than the activist who did not (see also Hastorf & Cantril, 1954).”

    From The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory (2006) · cites this paper as Hastorf & Cantril, 1954

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hastorf, A. H., & Cantril, H.
Venue
The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
Published
1954-01
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
129-134
ISSN
0096-851X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4254129346
Cited by
882
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 26
FWCI
3.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Physical education and sports games research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review