Cited by 13Archaeological Research and ProtectionArchaeology and Cultural HeritageGeophysical Methods and Applications

Predictive modeling

Open access
Verhagen, Philip·2018·The Encyclopedia of Archaeological Sciences

Abstract

Predictive modeling is a technique to predict the location of archaeological sites in uninvestigated areas that has been used since the 1970s to aid spatial planning, for example, in cultural resource management. Predictive modeling is also used to develop and test scientific models of human locational behavior, as it is based on either statistical extrapolation of known archaeological data or explanatory models of site location preference. In practice, a number of methods can be used in predictive modeling, and the resulting maps of predicted site density can vary in accuracy. The main difficulties in producing accurate predictive models are coupled with the resolution and representativeness of the archaeological and nonarchaeological datasets used, the theoretical frameworks underlying the models, and the lack of model testing. Nonetheless, predictive models are very useful to provide basic protection to areas of high sensitivity, and can save costs for archaeological investigations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9781119188230.saseas0475

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Judge J. W., 1988, Quantifying the Present and Predicting the Past: Theory, Method and Application of Archaeological Predictive Modelling
  2. Verhagen P., 2008, Layers of Perception. Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA), Berlin, Germany, April 2–6, 2007. Kolloquien zur Vor‐ und Frühgeschichte, Vol. 10, 285
  3. Hudak G. J., 2002, Mn/Model Final Report 2002: A Predictive Model of Precontact Archaeological Site Location for the State of Minnesota

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Verhagen, P.
Affiliations
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Verhagen, Philip
Venue
The Encyclopedia of Archaeological Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-12-05
Pages
1-3
OpenAlex
W4249235227
Cited by
13
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Wiley eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Archaeological Research and Protection
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Geophysical Methods and Applications
Keywords
predictive modeling, archaeological site location, cultural resource management, spatial planning, model testing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review