Cited by 88Archaeological Research and ProtectionHistorical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesArchaeology and Cultural Heritage

Making space for an archaeology of place

Open access
University of Southampton, Wheatley, David·2004·Internet Archaeology

Abstract

Rather that attempt to write a balanced or complete overview of the application of GIS to archaeology (which would inevitably end up being didactic and uncritical) this paper sets out to present a discursive and contentious position with the deliberate aim of stimulating further debate about the future role of GIS within our discipline.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.11141/ia.15.10

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Clarke, D.L. 1977 Spatial Archaeology. London.
  2. Fisher, P. 1996 'Reconsideration of the viewshed function in terrain modelling'. Geographical Systems 3, 33-58.
  3. Gaffney, V. and van Leusen, M. 1995 'Postscript — GIS, environmental determinism and archaeology: a parallel text'. In G.R. Lock and Z. Stançic (eds) Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: a European Perspective. London. 367-82.
  4. Huggett, J. 2000 'Looking at intra-site GIS'. In K. Lockyear, T.J.T. Sly, and V. Mihailescu-Birliba (eds) CAA96 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. British Archaeological Reports International Series 845. Oxford. 117-22.
  5. Kvamme, K. L. 1990a 'The fundamental principles and practice of predictive archaeological modelling'. In A. Voorips (ed.) Mathematics and Information Science in Archaeology: a Flexible Framework. Bonn. 257-95.
  6. Kvamme, K.L. 1997 'Ranters corner: bringing the camps together: GIS and ED'. Archaeological Computing Newsletter 47, 1-5.
  7. Loots, L. 1997 'The use of projective and reflective viewsheds in the analysis of the Hellenistic defence system at Sagalassos'. Archaeological Computing Newsletter 49, 12-16.
  8. Savage, S.H. 1990 'Modelling the Late Archaic social landscape'. In K.M.S. Allen, S. Green, and E.B.W. Zubrow (eds) Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology. London. 330-35.
  9. Thomas, J. 1993 'The politics of vision and the archaeologies of landscape'. In B. Bender (ed.) Landscape: Politics and Perspectives. London. 19-48.
  10. Vullo, N., Fontana, F. and Guerreschi, A. 1999 'The application of GIS to intra-site spatial analysis: preliminary results from Alpe Veglia (VB) and Mondeval de Sora (BL), two Mesolithic sites in the Italian Alps'. In J.A. Barcelo, I. Briz and A. Vila (eds) New Techniques for Old Times: CAA98. British Archaeological Reports International Series 757. Oxford. 111-16.
  11. Warren, R.E. 1990 'Predictive modelling of archaeological site location: a primer'. In K.M.S. Allen, S.W. Green and E.B.W. Zubrow (eds) Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology. London.
  12. Wheatley, D. 1995 'Cumulative viewshed analysis: a GIS-based method for investigating intervisibility, and its archaeological application'. In G. Lock and Z. Stançic (eds) Archaeology and Geographic Information Systems: a European Perspective. London. 171-85.
  13. Wheatley, D. 1996a 'Between the lines: the role of GIS-based predictive modelling in the interpretation of extensive field survey'. In H. Kammermans and K. Fennema (eds) Interfacing the Past. Analecta Praehistorica Leidensa 28. Leiden. 275-92.
  14. Wheatley, D. 1998 'Ranters corner: keeping the camp fires burning: the case for pluralism'. Archaeological Computing Newsletter 50, 2-7.
  15. Wheatley, D. and Gillings, M. 2000 'Vision, perception and GIS: developing enriched approaches to the study of archaeological visibility'. In G.R. Lock (ed.) Beyond the Map: Archaeology and Spatial Technologies. NATO Science Series A: Life Sciences 321. Amsterdam. 1-27.
  16. Woodman, P.E. and Woodward, M. 2002 'The use and abuse of statistical methods in archaeological site location modelling'. In D. Wheatley, G. Earl, and S. Poppy (eds) Contemporary Themes in Archaeological Computing. University of Southampton Department of Archaeology Monograph 3. Oxford. 39-43.
  17. Zubrow, E.B.W. 1990 'Contemplating space: a commentary of theory'. In K.M.S. Allen, S.W. Green and E.B.W. Zubrow (eds) Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology. London. 67-72.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
University of Southampton, & Wheatley, D.
Affiliations
University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Wheatley, David
Venue
Internet Archaeology
Published
2004
Issue
15
ISSN
1363-5387 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032729997
Cited by
88
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-sa
Locations
  • Internet Archaeology (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Archaeological Research and Protection
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
archaeological GIS, predictive modeling, visibility analysis, cultural resource management, archaeology of space, phenomenology, archaeological theory, human experience of place, spatial analysis in archaeology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review