Cited by 415Probability and Statistical ResearchMarkov Chains and Monte Carlo MethodsStochastic processes and statistical mechanics

Markov Chains: From Theory to Implementation and Experimentation

Gagniuc, Paul A·2017·Wiley eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9781119387596

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Markov model was leveraged to construct a process based on discrete-time state transitions and action rewards, named Markov Decision Process (MDP), which formalizes sequential decision-making problems in a fully observable, controlled environment.

    “In addition, the Markov model [159, 296] (elaborated 50 years earlier) was leveraged to construct a process based on discrete-time state transitions and action rewards, named Markov Decision Process (MDP), which formalizes sequential decision-making problems in a fully observable, controlled environment [46].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gagniuc, P. A.
Corresponding author
Gagniuc, Paul A
Venue
Wiley eBooks
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-06-22
OpenAlex
W4235646468
Cited by
415
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 17
FWCI
7.99
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Wiley eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics
Keywords
Markov chains, stochastic processes, transition probabilities, Markov property

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review