Cited by 175Remote-Sensing Image ClassificationAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsArtificial Intelligence Applications

Deep Learning for the Earth Sciences: A Comprehensive Approach to Remote Sensing, Climate Science, and Geosciences

·2021·Wiley eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9781119646181

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hybrid models leveraging both deep learning and bio-physical models tend to be less data-intensive, avoid incoherent predictions, and are generally more interpretable than purely data-driven models.

    “such hybrid models tend to be less data-intensive, avoid incoherent predictions, and are generally more interpretable than purely data-driven models.”

    From Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation (2022) · cites this paper as [49]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Venue
Wiley eBooks
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-08-20
OpenAlex
W4243053434
Cited by
175
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
36.17
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Wiley eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
deep learning, earth sciences, geoscience applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review