Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 299

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): A Guide to Best Practice

·2014·Wiley eBooks

Abstract

Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a systems-oriented methodology for addressing the environmental consequences associated with a product or service.It is used for studies of the material and energy flows and their environmental impacts related to a product or a service, i.e., from raw material extraction, to production and use, to disposal.LCA, together with life cycle thinking, life cycle management, and life cycle sustainability assessment, makes up the portfolio of life cycle approaches. Methodological FrameworkLife cycle assessment (LCA) study is defined both by the product system it models and the procedure used to study it, the LCA model and the LCA procedure, respectively.The LCA model describes the flow system from raw material extraction to waste disposal, including production, transportation, use, and recycling loops associated with a product (or a service).The procedure consists of several steps.The analysis starts with the definition of goal and scope, in which the researchers specify the product(s) to be studied and the purpose of the LCA study.In the inventory analysis, they construct the life cycle model consisting of the technical processes of the product system, create an inventory of emissions and resource usage in each process, and then calculate the amounts of emissions produced and the resources used in the product system.Results at this stage are called life cycle inventory (LCI) results and consist of amounts of raw materials, energy, and emissions.Next, in the impact assessment, the LCI results are translated into environmental impacts.Owing to the complexity of ecological systems and environmental impacts, impacts can be evaluated in various ways.Emissions and resource use can be classified, characterized, and normalized with regard to their potential or contribution to various environmental problems (e.g., resource depletion, global warming, and toxicity).Some environmental problems have been easier to make assessment methods for (e.g., global warming), whereas others have shown to be more difficult (e.g., toxicity, biodiversity loss) and for which methodology development continues.In the weighting step, the relative significance of the different environmental problems is evaluated.This leads to the calculation of a sum of the total environmental impact for the studied product system.There are several weighting methods, each representing different perspectives on prioritization of environmental problems, e.g., cultural, economic, or political values, or ecological boundaries.Whether one presents results as LCI results, characterized impacts or weighted impact depends too on the purpose of the study, determined by, for example, what is appropriate for public communication and what is useful for internal use.Finally, the

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9783527655625

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

Metadata

Venue
Wiley eBooks
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-04-11
OpenAlex
W3181205940
Cited by
299
References
12
FWCI
9.72
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): A Guide to Best Practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/9783527655625
The paper
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): A Guide to Best Practice. (2014). Wiley eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527655625

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.