The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): A Guide to Best Practice
Abstract
Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a systems-oriented methodology for addressing the environmental consequences associated with a product or service.It is used for studies of the material and energy flows and their environmental impacts related to a product or a service, i.e., from raw material extraction, to production and use, to disposal.LCA, together with life cycle thinking, life cycle management, and life cycle sustainability assessment, makes up the portfolio of life cycle approaches. Methodological FrameworkLife cycle assessment (LCA) study is defined both by the product system it models and the procedure used to study it, the LCA model and the LCA procedure, respectively.The LCA model describes the flow system from raw material extraction to waste disposal, including production, transportation, use, and recycling loops associated with a product (or a service).The procedure consists of several steps.The analysis starts with the definition of goal and scope, in which the researchers specify the product(s) to be studied and the purpose of the LCA study.In the inventory analysis, they construct the life cycle model consisting of the technical processes of the product system, create an inventory of emissions and resource usage in each process, and then calculate the amounts of emissions produced and the resources used in the product system.Results at this stage are called life cycle inventory (LCI) results and consist of amounts of raw materials, energy, and emissions.Next, in the impact assessment, the LCI results are translated into environmental impacts.Owing to the complexity of ecological systems and environmental impacts, impacts can be evaluated in various ways.Emissions and resource use can be classified, characterized, and normalized with regard to their potential or contribution to various environmental problems (e.g., resource depletion, global warming, and toxicity).Some environmental problems have been easier to make assessment methods for (e.g., global warming), whereas others have shown to be more difficult (e.g., toxicity, biodiversity loss) and for which methodology development continues.In the weighting step, the relative significance of the different environmental problems is evaluated.This leads to the calculation of a sum of the total environmental impact for the studied product system.There are several weighting methods, each representing different perspectives on prioritization of environmental problems, e.g., cultural, economic, or political values, or ecological boundaries.Whether one presents results as LCI results, characterized impacts or weighted impact depends too on the purpose of the study, determined by, for example, what is appropriate for public communication and what is useful for internal use.Finally, the
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Environmental management. Life cycle assessment. Principles and framework
(2013) · doi:10.3403/30151316 · Cited by 1,401
The hitch hiker's guide to LCA : an orientation in life cycle assessment methodology and application
Baumann, H., & Tillman, A. (2004) · Cited by 753
Hetherington, A. C., Borrion, A. L., Griffiths, O. G., & McManus, M. C. (2014) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-013-0627-8 · Cited by 271
Prospective Life Cycle Assessment of Graphene Production by Ultrasonication and Chemical Reduction
Arvidsson, R., Kushnir, D., Sandén, B. A., & Molander, S. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es405338k · Cited by 211
Eckelman, M. J., Mauter, M. S., Isaacs, J. A., & Elimelech, M. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es203409a · Cited by 199
Gavankar, S., Suh, S., & Keller, A. A. (2015) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12175 · Cited by 198
Life Cycle Economic and Environmental Implications of Using Nanocomposites in Automobiles
Lloyd, S. M., & Lave, L. B. (2003) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es026023q · Cited by 180
Environmental and Cost Assessment of a Polypropylene Nanocomposite
Roes, A. L., Marsili, E., Nieuwlaar, E., & Patel, M. K. (2007) · Journal of Polymers and the Environment · doi:10.1007/s10924-007-0064-5 · Cited by 142
Illustrating Anticipatory Life Cycle Assessment for Emerging Photovoltaic Technologies
Wender, B. A., Foley, R. W., Prado, V., Ravikumar, D., Eisenberg, D. A., Hottle, T. A., Sadowski, J., Flanagan, W. P., Fisher, A., Laurin, L., et al. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es5016923 · Cited by 133
Carbon Nanofiber Polymer Composites: Evaluation of Life Cycle Energy Use
Khanna, V., & Bakshi, B. R. (2009) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es802101x · Cited by 126
Cited by
Pscherer, T., & Krommes, S. (2025) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-024-02387-7 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Venue
- Wiley eBooks
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-04-11
- OpenAlex
- W3181205940
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 9.72
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): A Guide to Best Practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/9783527655625
- The paper
- Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): A Guide to Best Practice. (2014). Wiley eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527655625
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.